Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 57 (9054 total)
336 online now:
AZPaul3, kjsimons, nwr, PaulK, vimesey (5 members, 331 visitors)
Newest Member: EWolf
Post Volume: Total: 888,312 Year: 5,958/14,102 Month: 106/438 Week: 38/112 Day: 1/11 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The Biden Presidency
DrJones*
Member
Posts: 2187
From: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Joined: 08-19-2004


(2)
Message 226 of 258 (888842)
10-10-2021 1:17 AM
Reply to: Message 223 by marc9000
10-09-2021 9:30 PM


Re: Gang gallop ?
remember, people don't get angry when lies are told about them, they get angry when the truth is told about them.

thanks for confirming that every time trump shits himself in rage over what the media reports it's because it's true.

It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds
soon I discovered that this rock thing was true
Jerry Lee Lewis was the devil
Jesus was an architect previous to his career as a prophet
All of a sudden i found myself in love with the world
And so there was only one thing I could do
Was ding a ding dang my dang along ling long - Jesus Built my Hotrod Ministry
Live every week like it's Shark Week! - Tracey Jordan
Just a monkey in a long line of kings. - Matthew Good
If "elitist" just means "not the dumbest motherfucker in the room", I'll be an elitist! - Get Your War On
*not an actual doctor

This message is a reply to:
 Message 223 by marc9000, posted 10-09-2021 9:30 PM marc9000 has not yet responded

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 20419
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 4.9


Message 227 of 258 (888843)
10-10-2021 10:46 AM
Reply to: Message 224 by marc9000
10-09-2021 9:53 PM


Re: Gang gallop ?
Happy birthday!

--Percy


This message is a reply to:
 Message 224 by marc9000, posted 10-09-2021 9:53 PM marc9000 has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 228 by marc9000, posted 10-10-2021 3:39 PM Percy has acknowledged this reply

  
marc9000
Member
Posts: 1260
From: Ky U.S.
Joined: 12-25-2009


(1)
Message 228 of 258 (888847)
10-10-2021 3:39 PM
Reply to: Message 227 by Percy
10-10-2021 10:46 AM


thanks
Thank you.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 227 by Percy, posted 10-10-2021 10:46 AM Percy has acknowledged this reply

  
LamarkNewAge
Member
Posts: 2020
Joined: 12-22-2015
Member Rating: 1.2


Message 229 of 258 (888995)
10-28-2021 7:35 PM


Only 31% of pregnant U.S. women have been vaccinated.
Good job, Biden!

You and your party have just done a smashing job, with your great credibility & sincerity, as you boldly grip the heart of the nation - marching us forward.

Real leadership in action.

Just look at those results!

Edited by LamarkNewAge, : No reason given.


Replies to this message:
 Message 230 by Tanypteryx, posted 10-28-2021 7:56 PM LamarkNewAge has not yet responded

  
Tanypteryx
Member
Posts: 2626
From: Oregon, USA
Joined: 08-27-2006
Member Rating: 5.4


Message 230 of 258 (888996)
10-28-2021 7:56 PM
Reply to: Message 229 by LamarkNewAge
10-28-2021 7:35 PM


Re: Only 31% of pregnant U.S. women have been vaccinated.
You still can't make trump look any better.

What if Eleanor Roosevelt had wings? -- Monty Python

One important characteristic of a theory is that is has survived repeated attempts to falsify it. Contrary to your understanding, all available evidence confirms it. --Subbie

If evolution is shown to be false, it will be at the hands of things that are true, not made up. --percy

The reason that we have the scientific method is because common sense isn't reliable. -- Taq


This message is a reply to:
 Message 229 by LamarkNewAge, posted 10-28-2021 7:35 PM LamarkNewAge has not yet responded

  
AZPaul3
Member
Posts: 6085
From: Phoenix
Joined: 11-06-2006
Member Rating: 4.7


Message 231 of 258 (888997)
10-28-2021 8:22 PM


Oh lookie, somebody stepped on the squeakie toy.

Eschew obfuscation. Habituate elucidation.

Replies to this message:
 Message 232 by LamarkNewAge, posted 10-28-2021 10:50 PM AZPaul3 has not yet responded
 Message 233 by LamarkNewAge, posted 10-29-2021 12:19 AM AZPaul3 has responded

  
LamarkNewAge
Member
Posts: 2020
Joined: 12-22-2015
Member Rating: 1.2


Message 232 of 258 (888998)
10-28-2021 10:50 PM
Reply to: Message 231 by AZPaul3
10-28-2021 8:22 PM


Ryan, in 2012, said this. Trump did this. Bush sucked squeaky toy.
Kill all anti-vaxers!

Yeaaaaaaaaa!


This message is a reply to:
 Message 231 by AZPaul3, posted 10-28-2021 8:22 PM AZPaul3 has not yet responded

  
LamarkNewAge
Member
Posts: 2020
Joined: 12-22-2015
Member Rating: 1.2


Message 233 of 258 (889004)
10-29-2021 12:19 AM
Reply to: Message 231 by AZPaul3
10-28-2021 8:22 PM


Did you catch my Dean squeak errr "Deal Squeal"?
He was a Democrat you know!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 231 by AZPaul3, posted 10-28-2021 8:22 PM AZPaul3 has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 234 by AZPaul3, posted 10-29-2021 12:35 AM LamarkNewAge has not yet responded

  
AZPaul3
Member
Posts: 6085
From: Phoenix
Joined: 11-06-2006
Member Rating: 4.7


(1)
Message 234 of 258 (889007)
10-29-2021 12:35 AM
Reply to: Message 233 by LamarkNewAge
10-29-2021 12:19 AM


Re: Did you catch my Dean squeak errr "Deal Squeal"?
Did you catch my Dean squeak errr "Deal Squeal"?

He was a Democrat you know!

No. No catch. I keep a social distance and wear a mask. I'm trying not to catch anything.


Eschew obfuscation. Habituate elucidation.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 233 by LamarkNewAge, posted 10-29-2021 12:19 AM LamarkNewAge has not yet responded

  
ramoss
Member
Posts: 3210
Joined: 08-11-2004


Message 235 of 258 (889017)
10-30-2021 2:05 AM
Reply to: Message 203 by marc9000
10-07-2021 11:54 AM


Unfortunately for you , Judicial watch is not a very valid source of information.
Judicial Watch - Questionable Source - Conspiracy - Extreme Right Bias - Conservative - Republican - Fake News - Not CredibleFactual Reporting: Low - Not Credible - Not Reliable - Fake News - Bias
QUESTIONABLE SOURCE

A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per-article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section of that source. See all Questionable sources.

Overall, we rate Judicial Watch Questionable based on extreme right-wing bias, promotion of conspiracy theories, and an abysmal fact check record.

Edited by ramoss, : No reason given.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 203 by marc9000, posted 10-07-2021 11:54 AM marc9000 has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 236 by Percy, posted 10-30-2021 10:28 AM ramoss has not yet responded
 Message 238 by marc9000, posted 10-30-2021 9:13 PM ramoss has not yet responded

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 20419
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 4.9


Message 236 of 258 (889018)
10-30-2021 10:28 AM
Reply to: Message 235 by ramoss
10-30-2021 2:05 AM


Wouldn't Marc just answer that that's just the lying liberal media throwing mud at Judicial Watch because it's constantly embarrassing them by revealing their lies? Marc chooses his own "facts" and so is able to reach any conclusion he likes.

--Percy


This message is a reply to:
 Message 235 by ramoss, posted 10-30-2021 2:05 AM ramoss has not yet responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 237 by LamarkNewAge, posted 10-30-2021 8:41 PM Percy has acknowledged this reply
 Message 239 by marc9000, posted 10-30-2021 9:53 PM Percy has responded

  
LamarkNewAge
Member
Posts: 2020
Joined: 12-22-2015
Member Rating: 1.2


Message 237 of 258 (889023)
10-30-2021 8:41 PM
Reply to: Message 236 by Percy
10-30-2021 10:28 AM


Judicial Watch had a non partisan (but conservative) soul till 2009 (or later).
I have not followed it much.

I know that libertarians, as well as non partisan progressives eventually went sour with Obama.

Jesse Ventura went sour.

James Bamford went sour.

I suspect that the THE RUSSIANS ARE COMING CRAZY CRAP is what caused the non partisan conservatives/libertarian groups to be set fundamentally at odds with the Democrats.

Back in my 9th grade years, I was able to attend a school that was really really good ( The school cost over $50,000 to attend during the first decade of this century, but I attended when it was much cheaper a few decades earlier, or a decade and a half).

The history teacher was a non partisan semi-progressive (He was not a Clinton fan at as all during the primaries), and he was a registered Democrat. His whole classroom, as well as house, looked like a library with 10 foot high shelves. He was relieved we "no longer had to hear about the Russian 'threat' ".

I kept warning the class that we would have all sorts of 'threats' presented to us (I was almost prophetic about the CIA & FBI plots/lies against "people from North Africa and the Middle East"), and he would just scream (to the extent that a mild mannered 60 year old could) when I warned about a phoney "Russian threat" making a comeback in decades.

He was sarcastically cynical about so much, that he just looked like an old, fat, bald, tired dead man walking - and he was. But I wonder if he is alive to see what miserable Russian conspiracies we all are supposed to swallow now?

Those who do not learn from the past are destined to...

(I suspect Judicial Watch is attacked by the moderate Democratic establishment over the skeptical position taken with regards to the "Russian threat", right?)

Edited by LamarkNewAge, : No reason given.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 236 by Percy, posted 10-30-2021 10:28 AM Percy has acknowledged this reply

  
marc9000
Member
Posts: 1260
From: Ky U.S.
Joined: 12-25-2009


Message 238 of 258 (889024)
10-30-2021 9:13 PM
Reply to: Message 235 by ramoss
10-30-2021 2:05 AM


Unfortunately for you , Judicial watch is not a very valid source of information.

No link? Are you afraid to have me check the bias of YOUR source?


This message is a reply to:
 Message 235 by ramoss, posted 10-30-2021 2:05 AM ramoss has not yet responded

  
marc9000
Member
Posts: 1260
From: Ky U.S.
Joined: 12-25-2009


Message 239 of 258 (889025)
10-30-2021 9:53 PM
Reply to: Message 236 by Percy
10-30-2021 10:28 AM


Wouldn't Marc just answer that that's just the lying liberal media throwing mud at Judicial Watch because it's constantly embarrassing them by revealing their lies? Marc chooses his own "facts" and so is able to reach any conclusion he likes.

Sheesh, I try to leave you folks alone for awhile in your little fantasy world, and my name keeps coming up, it's almost like I live rent free in several heads here. But it opens the door for some temporary fun.

All news is biased, there was probably some stoic, unbiased news reporting done in the early days of television and radio, but it didn't take long for them to realize that there's not near as much money and ratings in that as there is in sensationalism and political bias, in either direction. News bias started out liberal in the late 60's and beyond, because the controversy it created by bucking tradition created the ratings that that era's news media was looking for. By the late 80's on, that created the market for Rush Limbaugh, Fox news etc, and they took things the other way. Instead of trying to correct themselves, the mainstream media doubled down with their bias. I remember in the late 80's CNN's "Headline News", while somewhat biased, was actually an okay source for some basic information. They showed very little hatred for Reagan or Bush 41, they had no reporters anything like Jim Acosta back then.

But all this has created the mess we have today. No way for there to be agreement among the two "sides" as to whose fault it is.

So your assessment of my "answer" is slightly warm, but not really too close. News is all biased, the biggest bias they all show is the omission of most (but not all) news that's not favorable to the political party they're beholden to. The best way to find out what's going on is for a person to get news from multiple sources, and use common sense to determine what seems most believable. I missed ABC World News Tonight this evening, and Thursday evening, so I can't be sure, but I'm reasonably sure that both of those nights, like the other nights when I did watch, that they have not a word to say about the 3000 + caravan of illegals in Mexico marching towards the U.S. southern border right now. Fox News covers it of course, just today one of the reporters there asked one of them, "why come now, why now?" "Because the time is right, because of Joe Biden", as marchers around him proudly wear Biden t-shirts. When it hits the border and it's big news for the conservative news sources, the mainstream will be forced to give it very limited coverage. The way many of them will be bused and flown to different parts of the U.S. will continue to be covered up.

But back to Judicial Watch, this is from your Message 209;

The correct travel information that Marc linked to but misrepresented can be found at...

Your long link showed tons of travel by Hunter Biden. Specifically, what did I (and Judicial Watch) mis-represent?


This message is a reply to:
 Message 236 by Percy, posted 10-30-2021 10:28 AM Percy has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 240 by Percy, posted 11-01-2021 2:52 PM marc9000 has not yet responded

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 20419
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 4.9


(2)
Message 240 of 258 (889077)
11-01-2021 2:52 PM
Reply to: Message 239 by marc9000
10-30-2021 9:53 PM


marc9000 writes:

Sheesh, I try to leave you folks alone for awhile in your little fantasy world, and my name keeps coming up, it's almost like I live rent free in several heads here.

Get used to it - you've become the poster boy for irrationality.

--Percy


This message is a reply to:
 Message 239 by marc9000, posted 10-30-2021 9:53 PM marc9000 has not yet responded

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2021