An Ether-Based Creation Model

In Canada, we sent them to residential schools to try to turn them white. Didn't work.

In my ether model, elemental ether units vibrate and contact each other without moving inertially. The ether is everywhere, although not continuously contiguous, it constitutes a universal underlying matrix, which underlies quantum units. Compared to ether dynamics, quantum dynamics operate differently, via waves, fields, spin, and so on, along spatial vectors. However, a quantum transmission through space is continuously interacting with the primary forces of the underlying ether matrix, because quantum units are constantly "feeling" the ether, inasmuch as all quantum units were originally formed from "building block" ether units, and thus still retain the ability to interact with the ether through vibration.My kind of model is the only one that makes overall sense, especially if one considers the question of how atomic structuring arose. -Physics now proposes a model involving a Big Bang, followed by the appearance of a panoply of different subatomic units like muons, the Higgs boson, etc. -With my model, our quantum/atomic universe was created by sending quantum electrons, from an atomically-structured base, through the ether beyond. The linear paths of the electrons through the ether aligned the vibrations of the ether units there, causing them to entrain with each other, forming larger units, up to the size scale of quantum units: protons and neutrons, and atoms.While it's true that larger numbers of muons have been detected around the earth, which physics proposes arise when cosmic rays strike earth's outer atmosphere, my model would counter that those muons merely stem from vast cosmic collisions such as quasars and the like.The current standard model in physics will never account for the systematic orderliness of atomic structuring.

You forgot to take Bugs Bunny, Daffy Duck, Elmer Fudd and Marvin the Martian into account.--Percy

Larger numbers of muons compared to what? So, you do not even have a clue what a quasar is. Such as quasars and the like? WTF is and the like?You must have worked for months on this post.

When you refer to my ether model and remark that I "haven't a clue what a quasar is," you are starting to venture into a whole area of cosmology. To address how my ether model would treat quasars, and compare that to how quantum physics views the origin of quasars, would require deviating the discussion into pages and pages of new dialogue/debate,My Creation Model has a basically-different overview, compared to "random forces" quantum physics, of how cosmic events like quasars originate. My Ether Model views cosmic forces and events like quasars from the viewpoint that such things are "under management" of ether-technology groups (does the term "UFO" ring a bell?), operating occultly with respect the earth people, who use etheric forces to keep the areas where entities exist safe from such chaotic disturbances as quasars.To just touch on how my model views quasars in particular, they are super-energic systems resulting from super-nova collisions that have gotten out of hand, producing an enormous chaotic non-linear focus of energy requiring technological application, by UFOs, of even-greater, purely-linear ("cleaner") etheric forces, to overcome them, to where their non-linear chaotic effects can't disturb more-distant cosmic areas where entities are located. The quasar's super-energies are still there as seen astronomically, but no longer as harmful.

quote:

---

When you refer to my ether model and remark that I "haven't a clue what a quasar is," you are starting to venture into a whole area of cosmology.

---

No, it’s just pointing out that you are a silly crank who doesn’t know what he is talking about.

Well, you brought quasars up in the first place. Thank you for confirming that you still don't have a clue what they are. OK, now we are getting somewhere, your "Ether Model" is a science fiction and fantasy story. Watch out for those ether technology anal probes!Edited by Tanypteryx, : No reason given.

As I said, I wouldn't want to take my Ether Model into the area of cosmology. My basic model of elemental forces and a universal ether has not gotten serious consideration yet, so it would be inappropriate to try to extend it further into the other area of theory.The subject of cosmic muons came up in discussing creation and how atomic structuring may relate to that, but I would not want to take it any further into cosmologic theory.

You are making the right decision, it should stay in the hypothetical fantasy and science fiction section.

I mentioned that I didn't want to try promoting my Ether Model by applying it to cosmology, there would be an "other" area of theory I think my model would fit into well.The question what is the nature of Time has been an ongoing subject of controversy for a long time. -Some fairly well-known theorists have even suggested abolishing the idea that Time actually exists at all (a concept that would fail to account for the finding that Time can vary with different locations and states of motion.)If you apply my model, of a universal ether composed of individual units that vibrate, one can then propose a highly-rational theory of what Time actually is. Time would be a Rate, specifically the vibratory rate of the units that comprise the ether, because the ether (logically) must be universal, and must exist everywhere, existing both inside and outside everything.

You really do like "your model" don't you? I suppose that SI cannot compete for her attention. But hey! There is always the freedom of speech!

This makes no sense. Time is prior to any notion of rate.I'd say that Tanypteryx nailed it, when he said this all belongs in the science fiction and fantasy section.

Please stop insulting Science Fiction and Fantasy.

Hey there's a lot of shitty science fiction out there. MD added flying saucers, turning his model into just shitty fiction.

Non-existence comes into play with any ether-based creation model, especially because the rate of units is shared by universal time, as opposed to individual units which must stand or fall depending on vibrational position and the motion of states.--Percy