|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: An Ether-Based Creation Model | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Percy Member Posts: 22502 From: New Hampshire Joined: Member Rating: 4.9
|
Non-existence comes into play with any ether-based creation model, especially because the rate of units is shared by universal time, as opposed to individual units which must stand or fall depending on vibrational position and the motion of states.
--Percy
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Percy Member Posts: 22502 From: New Hampshire Joined: Member Rating: 4.9
|
Yes, exactly. The vibrational determinant quantizes observations into secondary identical units, directly operated into dynamic vibrations that contact the ether into Time and primarily operates the general idea.
But I don't think you've considered the focused oscillating cosmos that will without doubt conduct energetic measures that consume inferior components. --Percy
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Percy Member Posts: 22502 From: New Hampshire Joined: Member Rating: 4.9 |
dwise1 writes: But isn't the ultimate solution to reverse the polarity of the neutron stream? You'd think so, but Michael MD is the expert, so we should check with him. But one thing's for sure, a universal ether has to account for spacial localities, and this has deep consequences for combinational energy units with dynamically varying vibrational patterns and for an "ether microcosm" where even magnetism has photonic entrainments. --Percy
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Percy Member Posts: 22502 From: New Hampshire Joined: Member Rating: 4.9
|
If you're serious: I nominate you for most clueless of the month.
If you're not: The party's over, it's not funny anymore. --Percy
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Percy Member Posts: 22502 From: New Hampshire Joined: Member Rating: 4.9 |
Have you considered the endochronic properties of resublimated thiotimoline?
--Percy Edited by Percy, : Grammar.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Percy Member Posts: 22502 From: New Hampshire Joined: Member Rating: 4.9 |
Thanks, Michael, we finally get it now. Your work here is done. Just sit by the phone and wait for the call from the Nobel committee.
--Percy
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Percy Member Posts: 22502 From: New Hampshire Joined: Member Rating: 4.9 |
I don't know why people don't see your brilliance. Clearly the universal ether matrix is all around us due to first causes while ethereal basic elements changed from alternating independently to contingently pulsating.
Staying within this fundamental structure draws our attention to issues of light spreading and time passage. Time's qualities are widely disputed, but your fundamental ether proposal establishes the elemental shudderings of the matrix through both internal and external omnipresence. Emanations theorize in the light of quanta, and some photonic quanta raise issues involving how many sun-filled beams can trillion on their origin in distant energy sources. Ether model question fitting beams light to follow photonic appearances through etheric propagative sub-models. Radiational energy sources react areally in linear transmissive energies by unitizing alignments quiescently and randomizing the interacting otherizing model-wise. Matching lock-linked up-wise vibrationally creates larger energized unitizements as lighter propagations etherically photonize size scales. Matrix-minded ethers limits distances to beam conduction lightly. Omniscient ether fluctuates connections to individualize constants imperfectly continuously everywhere because of vibrational travels. Generational photons space through light paths on their way through the cosmos. I think your theory is all wrapped up in a nice neat package ready for submission to the Academy of Sciences. --Percy
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Percy Member Posts: 22502 From: New Hampshire Joined: Member Rating: 4.9
|
Your original uncyclical attempts researching etheric classical luminosity undermine elucidations liquidating ephemeral standard systematics.
--Percy
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Percy Member Posts: 22502 From: New Hampshire Joined: Member Rating: 4.9 |
Michael MD writes: Besides being a medical doctor, I have a bachelor degree as a major in chemistry, a tough major course in one of the physical sciences. I received a membership in the American Chemical Society at that time. This is just as much fantasy as your ether claims. What you've written in this thread says "delusional," not "medical doctor" or even "college graduate." You've said very little true or rational since you've been here. --Percy
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Percy Member Posts: 22502 From: New Hampshire Joined: Member Rating: 4.9
|
Michael MD writes: Does quantum consensus theory still hold to the "lattice" model of atoms? I think you really meant to ask about one of the latticed models of condensed matter physics, such as the Icing model, the Mrs. Potts model, the XYZZY Adventure model or the Yoda lattice.
If not, how is an underlying ether still able to be dismissed? It's dismissed in a manner similar to the way the Flying Spaghetti Monster is dismissed, apologies to you Pastafarians out there. Though unlike the ether it can be difficult to dismiss the FSM, since we have actual images, like this one from an appearance in Denmark:
--Percy
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Percy Member Posts: 22502 From: New Hampshire Joined: Member Rating: 4.9 |
Michael MD writes: There is such a thing as the lattice theory of atoms in theoretical physics. Anyone interested in the status of the lattice theory can look it up on the Internet or in Wikipedia. From Wikipedia:
quote: Are you perhaps thinking of crystal lattices: Crystal structure - Wikipedia --Percy
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Percy Member Posts: 22502 From: New Hampshire Joined: Member Rating: 4.9 |
There was an article in American Scientist some months back that described the history of E=mC2 going back to Fritz Hasenöhrl, and it mentioned a 4/3 problem. It said the problem still isn't resolved and made it seem as if most physicists just ignore the issue. Any familiarity with this?
--Percy
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Percy Member Posts: 22502 From: New Hampshire Joined: Member Rating: 4.9 |
Oh, very interesting. Either I didn't understand the article or it didn't make clear that the 4/3 issue only applies to classical solutions. But there was no QM in 1905 when Einstein wrote his paper presenting his own derivation of the equation, so I wonder how he justified leaving out the 4/3. I recall the article talked about that so I'll go back and see what it says.
--Percy
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Percy Member Posts: 22502 From: New Hampshire Joined: Member Rating: 4.9 |
It's amazing how persistent you are in your delusion. There are many obvious responses to what you just said, but they've already been said many times and yet here you still are as determined and clueless as ever.
--Percy
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024