|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Gun Control III | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Percy Member Posts: 22392 From: New Hampshire Joined: Member Rating: 5.3 |
Phat writes: How would you defend the right to bear arms in today's modern and dysfunctional society? We do not live in a dysfunctional society. The firearm death rate will climb rapidly in any society that adopts accommodative gun laws and is flooded by easy to obtain guns and lots of ads glorifying guns resulting in a gun culture where people fall in love with their guns and zealously defend their right to endanger themselves and everyone around them If anything is dysfunctional it's the 2nd amendment. It was written in the time of muskets, and even though it's worded clearly, it apparently wasn't clear enough because the Supreme Court found room to misinterpret it in favor of a right to gun ownership by nearly everyone despite that the militias that were the justification no longer exist. --Percy
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Percy Member Posts: 22392 From: New Hampshire Joined: Member Rating: 5.3
|
Phat writes: Some of us resist a government that forces laws on us. What is a law that is forced on you? One you don't like? If one disagreed with the "right turn on red" law, does that mean it was forced on them? No government makes laws that 100% of the people agree with. We live in a representative democracy. We don't resist a legitimately elected government just because it passes laws we don't like. We instead vote for people who will pass laws more to our liking. --Percy
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Percy Member Posts: 22392 From: New Hampshire Joined: Member Rating: 5.3 |
jar writes: The evidence is out there Percy, real evidence not infotainment. And yet you can't find any evidence to put in a message. When you say "the evidence is out there" you're using almost identical language to the Trump crazies claiming the election was stolen. Okey, great, the evidence is out there. Go find it. You go on to attack some claims (again without evidence) that were never made, or at least not ones that I ever made. I won't be defending things I never said. --Percy Edited by Percy, : Grammar.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
dwise1 Member Posts: 5930 Joined: Member Rating: 5.8
|
Perhaps, but we cant simply have 51% of the people voting in laws that 100% are required to follow. Two big problems with that:
The sad situation we are in now is that through various forms of political skullduggery the representatives of a distinct minority of the population form the majority of many legislative bodies in this country. That means that the majority of Americans are being subjected to laws imposed on them by the minority! And now we are seeing representatives of that minority making new laws to further dilute the vote of the majority thus giving even more power to that minority. Time to do some math:
Basically, what the numbers show is that Democrats outnumber Republicans and that the swing demographic (ie, unaffiliated and other) is surprisingly large. Also, the Trumpian base amounts to about 44% of Republicans or about 15.9 million, about 6.8% of the total electorate (or about 10% of the electorate that had bothered to vote). And yet the Republican politicians holding seats in both houses of Congress as well as in state legislatures are Trumpian!. And in many of those state legislatures those Trumpians control those legislatures, while in Congress they have controlled Congress in the past and they have Congress very narrowly split (and could take the Congress back in 2022) while representing only 10%! Even if we were to give them the benefit of the doubt and allow them to be deemed as representing 46.86% of the electorate, that is still a minority! A minority making laws that adversely affect the majority! So your complaint about the "51%" is not only contrary to how democracy works, but it is also far out of touch with reality.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Percy Member Posts: 22392 From: New Hampshire Joined: Member Rating: 5.3
|
Up front I'll note that the message's title is a play on Bill Clinton's slogan, "It's the economy, stupid." I'm not calling gun nuts stupid. When I call them something I call them nuts.
The Ahmaud Arbery murder trial is over and all three defendants were found guilty, most notably Travis McMichael who actually pulled the trigger and was found guilty of the additional charge of malice murder. All three men, Travis McMichael, 35, his father Greg McMichael, 65, and their neighbor William “Roddie” Bryan, 52, could spend the rest of their lives behind bars. It all started a couple weeks before the murder when Travis McMichael called 911 to report a trespasser inside a house under construction, possibly armed. Did he report it because the "trespasser" was black? We walk through houses under construction all the time. There's a new neighborhood going up in the apple orchard next door where people from our neighborhood take walks (it's sad about the apple orchard, but that's another story). We've been taking walks through all the houses as they go up. Last month the builder was at one of the houses and gave us a tour, especially interesting to me because of the elaborate lighting control system being installed. Of course, we're white and the builder's white (practically everyone's white in this state, not my fault - I live here because I found a job here out of college nearly half a century ago). How would the builder have felt if we were black? Were we technically trespassing? There were no "No Trespassing" signs, and a brief Internet search indicates it isn't trespassing with no signs or barriers. The only signs were prominent ones identifying the builders. Later that same day while walking through another house the buyers came by. They gave us a tour of the ground floor and encouraged us to walk around upstairs while they began eating the eight pizzas they'd brought, eight because they knew some of the builders were arriving soon, which they did. But how would they have reacted if we were black? That's not a fair question to ask in NH. I'm sure there's racism in the state, but because there are so few blacks here there's little opportunity to see it or for people to build up any racial animosity. If you see a black person you immediately notice them because they're so rare, but you otherwise think nothing of it. Or maybe that's just me, I don't know. But we know there's racism in Cobb County, Georgia. There'd been some burglaries in the neighborhood, and Arbery had been seen after dark in that house under construction many times over many months (Oct. 25, 2019 until Feb. 23, 2020 when Arbery was killed), so when the McMichael's and their neighbor Roddie Bryan saw Arbery running through their neighborhood they knew that was the guy who'd been walking through that house. Presuming a connection to burglaries was a leap. They fetched a shotgun, climbed into their pickups, and took off after him. It's a mystery why they thought their burglar would run through their neighborhood in broad daylight. Maybe their reasoning came out at trial, I don't know, but I think any black person passing through their neighborhood would have drawn suspicion. Travis McMichael made a fatal mistake when he approached Arbery while holding his gun. If an angry man of any race holding a gun approached me, I would definitely grab the gun, and that's exactly what Arbery did. By walking up to Arbery while holding his gun McMichael created the very same situation of fear he claimed justified the shooting. The McMichaels and Bryan thought they were making a citizen's arrest, but they were mistaken. Inexplicably, citizen's arrests are legal in jurisdictions all across the country, but Wikipedia warns that anyone making a citizen's arrest risks being charged with any of a variety of crimes, like false imprisonment, unlawful restraint, kidnapping, and wrongful arrest. Citizen's arrest only make sense under limited circumstances where you see someone actually commit a crime. A guy in a bar starts smashing beer mugs and a few people detain him until the police get there, that's a citizen's arrest. But if you try to detain someone jogging through your neighborhood you're probably on somewhat thin legal ice, even if you know he was the same person you saw walking through a house under construction. Why was Arbery walking through that house after dark? That does seem very suspicious, but nothing was ever stolen. When I was a teenager houses under construction were a convenient trysting place though the floors were hard. Arbery was 25, not a teenager but still pretty young, so maybe he was thinking along such lines. Or maybe he was just checking out progress like people in our own neighborhood like to do, and he preferred to do it after dark because he knew a black man doing it in broad daylight would attract the wrong kind of attention. If Travis McMichael had not had a gun then likely the three of them would have been able to detain Arbery and call the police, and the police would have given Arbery a warning about trespassing. That's it. That's all the police would have done. That's what the policeman seeking Arbery because of the calls about a trespasser would have done. If caught again he would have been arrested on a misdemeanor charge of trespassing. That's all. Trespassing is not a serious offense. Burglary, for which there's no evidence of any Arbery involvement, is more serious, but it's not a killing offense. Travis McMichael should not have been carrying a gun. He didn't need one. That's why we need more gun control. More guns just mean more shootings. Ready availability of guns is what makes shootings so common in the United States. Like McMichael, Rittenhouse created the very situation of fear as McMichael by walking into a volatile situation with a gun. Both McMichael and Rittenhouse were right. When involved in an altercation there is the very real possibility that the gun could be taken away and used on you, or if someone else has a gun you fear that they might shoot you, so you fire first. But remove the guns from these situations and nothing happens. Those who claim we need guns because the US is so dangerous are creating that danger themselves by making guns so easily available. Take the guns away. --Percy Edited by Percy, : McMichael => Arbery in third to last para.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
nwr Member Posts: 6408 From: Geneva, Illinois Joined: Member Rating: 5.1 |
But remove the guns from these situations and nothing happens. Those who claim we need guns because the US is so dangerous are creating that danger themselves by making guns so easily available. Take the guns away.
Yes, I totally agree with that. When I was young, I would sometimes walk through houses under construction. So I saw this as normal curiosity.Fundamentalism - the anti-American, anti-Christian branch of American Christianity
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DrJones* Member Posts: 2284 From: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada Joined: Member Rating: 6.8 |
If Travis McMichael had not had a gun then likely the three of them would have been able to detain Arbery and call the police, and the police would have given Arbery a warning about trespassing. That's it. That's all the police would have done.
I think you're painting a very rosy picture in regards to what could happen when with three white men unlawfully stopping a black man. Or what would happen when the police arrive.It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds soon I discovered that this rock thing was true Jerry Lee Lewis was the devil Jesus was an architect previous to his career as a prophet All of a sudden i found myself in love with the world And so there was only one thing I could do Was ding a ding dang my dang along ling long - Jesus Built my Hotrod Ministry Live every week like it's Shark Week! - Tracey Jordan Just a monkey in a long line of kings. - Matthew Good If "elitist" just means "not the dumbest motherfucker in the room", I'll be an elitist! - Get Your War On *not an actual doctor
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Percy Member Posts: 22392 From: New Hampshire Joined: Member Rating: 5.3 |
True. I was taking what was testified to on the stand at face value.
--Percy
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Percy Member Posts: 22392 From: New Hampshire Joined: Member Rating: 5.3 |
Texas school shooting kills 18 children, 3 adults
For the multitudes of gun nuts in this country, apparently never. --Percy
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tanypteryx Member Posts: 4344 From: Oregon, USA Joined: Member Rating: 5.9 |
The GOP cheers for any opportunity to remind those idiots that Joe Biden is coming for their guns. Abbott has done it several times already today.
Stop Tzar Vladimir the Condemned! What if Eleanor Roosevelt had wings? -- Monty Python One important characteristic of a theory is that is has survived repeated attempts to falsify it. Contrary to your understanding, all available evidence confirms it. --Subbie If evolution is shown to be false, it will be at the hands of things that are true, not made up. --percy The reason that we have the scientific method is because common sense isn't reliable. -- Taq
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
vimesey Member Posts: 1398 From: Birmingham, England Joined:
|
A quotation from the BBC news article about it:
But Texas Senator Ted Cruz, a Republican, rejected the calls for gun control. He said restricting the rights of "law-abiding citizens... doesn't work. It's not effective. It doesn't prevent crime." Of course it doesn't - but to extrapolate his simplistic, vote-winning garbage: (a) having citizens armed doesn't prevent crime either (and in fact it increases the rates of murder); and (b) the lack of general availability of guns reduces hugely the occurrence of mass shootings of innocent targets (the last one I remember over here was in 1987). The Repugnant Party should at least agree to make a start with semi automatic rifles.Could there be any greater conceit, than for someone to believe that the universe has to be simple enough for them to be able to understand it ?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Percy Member Posts: 22392 From: New Hampshire Joined: Member Rating: 5.3
|
vimesey writes: A quotation from the BBC news article about it:
But Texas Senator Ted Cruz, a Republican, rejected the calls for gun control. He said restricting the rights of "law-abiding citizens... doesn't work. It's not effective. It doesn't prevent crime." This is untrue. Murder is a crime, and just as increasing the number of guns has increased murders, including the mass murders that draw all the attention, reducing the number of guns would decrease murders. I think it's a simple formula on guns for most Republicans: What position on guns will help get me elected? For them, it is definitely not a question of what would save the most lives. If they thought running on a position of more arsenic in the diet would help get them elected, they'd be for it. The Democrats are the same, making their positions contingent upon how many votes they'll garner. They only seem better than Republicans because Democratic platforms generally don't contain a lot of inherent violence or evil. Anybody running for office should be viewed with great suspicion. Heinlein once wrote that public officials should have to be dragged kicking and screaming into office. Yes, hiding beneath all their meet-and-greats and talks and town halls and speeches and endorsement and money chasing is a true desire to do good, but it's buried deeply beneath a lot of bullshit. It rarely gets a chance to express itself. Gun violence in the US will decrease only when the number of guns decreases. There is no other answer. Politically that won't fly, so things will only get worse. I'm not at all surprised at the direction things have gone, only at how fast it's gotten this bad. --Percy
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Theodoric Member Posts: 9076 From: Northwest, WI, USA Joined: Member Rating: 3.7 |
There will never be enough. The US will never implement meaningful gun control. That was obvious after Newtown. If we won't act after that we never will.
What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence. -Christopher Hitchens Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts "God did it" is not an argument. It is an excuse for intellectual laziness. If your viewpoint has merits and facts to back it up why would you have to lie?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tanypteryx Member Posts: 4344 From: Oregon, USA Joined: Member Rating: 5.9
|
Dear God, please make everybody feel better about mass murder, amen!
Stop Tzar Vladimir the Condemned! What if Eleanor Roosevelt had wings? -- Monty Python One important characteristic of a theory is that is has survived repeated attempts to falsify it. Contrary to your understanding, all available evidence confirms it. --Subbie If evolution is shown to be false, it will be at the hands of things that are true, not made up. --percy The reason that we have the scientific method is because common sense isn't reliable. -- Taq
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
dronestar Member Posts: 1407 From: usa Joined: |
What can be done about changing the gun violence in america?
There are 74 million tRump supporters. Almost all are impervious to words and facts, and will quickly double-down on their false and immoral beliefs and assertions. Most of them have repeatedly shown they LOVE their guns, more than their own children. None-the-less, I posted here Message 1, that SHOWING voters the consequences of their voting actions IS helpful. Some examples: 1. U.S. Army’s films of the liberations of concentration camps in Poland and Germany — bulldozers pushing the bodies of emaciated bodies into mass graves — left only the most sociopathic to deny the truth.2. The traumatic photos displayed every night on the news and media of america’s illegal and immoral actions in Vietnam caused the public to react against the war, and helped to end the war sooner than later. 3. The Emmett Till photos effectively brought the Civil Rights movement to the forefront of america. NOT SAFE FOR WORK: Musings for Friday - Maybe We Should Follow Mamie Till's Example Unfortunately, the american government learned its lesson not to show such photos during the gulf wars. The mutilated woman and children illegally and immorally hit by american weapons in hospitals or wedding parties were never shown in the media. Showing american troops in the unending coffins was also forbidden. The illegal and immoral government actions have been sanitized, safely hidden from public view, leaving americans to joyfully go on with their now untouched lives shopping, as Bush Jr advised. However, while most tRump supporters/gun-lovers will never change their minds, a few may be swayed by photos of the murdered children. Hopefully enough to change america’s nighmarish political landscape. When I was a grand jurist for 20 months I didn’t want to see any awful photos. But guess what, the photos that were exhibited did persuade. I don’t ever want to see photos of the recent massacres, but I read the children’s bodies were horribly mutilated by the AR-15 bullets, and needed to be identified by DNA. I do wish every mayor, governor, senator, and president, and american voter who resist changing the gun laws are FORCED to view those photos . . . I don’t need to view the photos. I assure you, I’m already quite sick of this. (Trump, Senator Ted Cruze, and Texas Gov Abbott will be speaking at the Nat Rifle assoc convention this weekend. Guns will be banned during Donald Trump's speech at the NRA conference)Edited by dronestar, . Edited by dronestar, .
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024