I don't know why people don't see your brilliance. Clearly the universal ether matrix is all around us due to first causes while ethereal basic elements changed from alternating independently to contingently pulsating.
Staying within this fundamental structure draws our attention to issues of light spreading and time passage.
Time's qualities are widely disputed, but your fundamental ether proposal establishes the elemental shudderings of the matrix through both internal and external omnipresence.
Emanations theorize in the light of quanta, and some photonic quanta raise issues involving how many sun-filled beams can trillion on their origin in distant energy sources.
Ether model question fitting beams light to follow photonic appearances through etheric propagative sub-models. Radiational energy sources react areally in linear transmissive energies by unitizing alignments quiescently and randomizing the interacting otherizing model-wise. Matching lock-linked up-wise vibrationally creates larger energized unitizements as lighter propagations etherically photonize size scales.
Matrix-minded ethers limits distances to beam conduction lightly. Omniscient ether fluctuates connections to individualize constants imperfectly continuously everywhere because of vibrational travels. Generational photons space through light paths on their way through the cosmos.
I think your theory is all wrapped up in a nice neat package ready for submission to the Academy of Sciences.
When I said "you'd have to use a different, or novel, type of field-test," I thought it would logically imply a protocol exists for that kind of test. It would require financial sponsorship, as it would be pretty expensive.
When I said "you'd have to use a different, or novel, type of field-test," I thought it would logically imply a protocol exists for that kind of test.
"Logically implies" does not tell you much at all.
Mathematics logically implies that numbers exist. But numbers don't actually exist. We made them up. And note that I am a professional mathematician (or I was until I retired). So numbers are important to me. But they still don't actually exist.
It would require financial sponsorship, as it would be pretty expensive.
Then you should be out there raising money. And I somehow doubt that any of the evcforum regulars will be making contributions -- especially since you have given no indication on how that money would be spent.
Fundamentalism - the anti-American, anti-Christian branch of American Christianity
In the newest issue (January2022) of Scientific American there is an interesting article, Can We Gauge Quantum Time of Flight? by Anil Ananthaswamy.
You might benefit from reading it and then reading it again. Note how hypotheses are proposed and what different results of experiments might support or reject different predictions. Then compare that to everything you have written here. Do you see the difference?
We already know a whole shitload of things about the Universe, and a part of that knowledge is; we know a lot about the gaps in our knowledge.
Physicists look at what we know with finer and finer resolution and propose solutions and predict what we should see if they are correct, but also what it means if they are incorrect.
They have to have to have a signal or observation or the unexplained absence of an expected signal or observation to investigate.
You have not shown us a single observation, or lack of one, that would convince a physicist to search for your undetected ether or to propose it as the solution to any observed gaps in our knowledge, yet you speak so authoritatively about it as if you have already detected it, or calculated its properties.
You have not been successful at bullshitting any of us, but it looks to us like you have been very successful at bullshitting yourself.
What if Eleanor Roosevelt had wings? -- Monty Python
One important characteristic of a theory is that is has survived repeated attempts to falsify it. Contrary to your understanding, all available evidence confirms it. --Subbie
If evolution is shown to be false, it will be at the hands of things that are true, not made up. --percy
The reason that we have the scientific method is because common sense isn't reliable. -- Taq
Percy, Not sure if your Post and suggestion to submit my material to the Academy of Sciences was intended seriously, but it is an extensive website. If you happen to know of a specific, likely-receptive, pathway there I might try submitting to, kindly let me know.
"Ether" net, as developed in our transmissional technologies, is unrelated to the "ether" as described in my ether-model. Ether net was begun in the 1970s and borrowed the term "ether" from theories in the 1800s which were based on theories and hypotheses of the possible existence of a so-called "luminiferous" ether. That concept of ether was set back after Michelson and Morley's famous optics-based experiment, putatively intended to detect "any kind of ether" in 1887, produced a negative result, after which physics dismissed the ether-concept, and purely-quantum physics, plus relativity, were officially adopted.
In my Ether Model, a universal ether matrix exists which comprises vanishingly-minuscule, elemental, vibrating, ether units. This kind of ether is unrelated to the usage of the term "ether" in "ether-net." There, much-larger quantum-scale forces are transmitted, as (in one technique) wire fibers are subjected to manipulations such as twisting, to refine the transmissions. Looking at this from the perspective of the kinds of forces existing in the ether in my Ether Model, there is no comparison to the refinement of ether forces that would be possible using "the real" ether.