|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total) |
| |
ChatGPT | |
Total: 916,817 Year: 4,074/9,624 Month: 945/974 Week: 272/286 Day: 33/46 Hour: 5/3 |
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Belief Versus The Scientific Method | |||||||||||||||||||
Tanypteryx Member Posts: 4443 From: Oregon, USA Joined: Member Rating: 5.0 |
So fauci and all others should check with you before claiming science? Good luck with that Nope, all the scientists already know what science is. By definition, you cannot be a scientist without knowing that. The scientific method is still the only systematic way to investigate phenomena in the Universe and determine the most likely explanation. New or additional observations and experiments can refine our understanding and test the probability that our conclusions are accurate. Not once in all of history has science concluded anything supernatural.What if Eleanor Roosevelt had wings? -- Monty Python One important characteristic of a theory is that is has survived repeated attempts to falsify it. Contrary to your understanding, all available evidence confirms it. --Subbie If evolution is shown to be false, it will be at the hands of things that are true, not made up. --percy The reason that we have the scientific method is because common sense isn't reliable. -- Taq
|
|||||||||||||||||||
drlove Member (Idle past 818 days) Posts: 153 Joined: |
Hey smelly, change your tone. Or talk to someone else
|
|||||||||||||||||||
drlove Member (Idle past 818 days) Posts: 153 Joined: |
So when no one knows or can test or prove something that is supernatural. Only you reserve the right to call the supernatural science?
|
|||||||||||||||||||
drlove Member (Idle past 818 days) Posts: 153 Joined: |
Yet the guy said anyone against him is anti science basically. You are another guy, with something else to say. Do not both Fauci and Malone use the scientific method? So who is to say where it actually applies?
|
|||||||||||||||||||
drlove Member (Idle past 818 days) Posts: 153 Joined: |
Is that what you believe?
|
|||||||||||||||||||
PaulK Member Posts: 17827 Joined: Member Rating: 2.3 |
How interesting that your response addresses absolutely nothing I said.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Tanypteryx Member Posts: 4443 From: Oregon, USA Joined: Member Rating: 5.0 |
Though I rather doubt that your troll nature will allow you to. It would be cool if he was a supernatural troll, though. Sorry, couldn't help myself. What if Eleanor Roosevelt had wings? -- Monty Python One important characteristic of a theory is that is has survived repeated attempts to falsify it. Contrary to your understanding, all available evidence confirms it. --Subbie If evolution is shown to be false, it will be at the hands of things that are true, not made up. --percy The reason that we have the scientific method is because common sense isn't reliable. -- Taq
|
|||||||||||||||||||
drlove Member (Idle past 818 days) Posts: 153 Joined: |
Does natural knowledge deal with that time before the laws of physics supposedly applied? If not, would it not be supernatural according to your statements here?
|
|||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 421 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
drl writes: Is that what you believe? No, it is the conclusion based on all the evidence. Only the Christian Cult of Ignorance willfully denies that reality.My Website: My Website
|
|||||||||||||||||||
drlove Member (Idle past 818 days) Posts: 153 Joined: |
So that is not what you believe? Be clear.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
drlove Member (Idle past 818 days) Posts: 153 Joined: |
Except you made that up. Others might base their belief on evidences that they accepted rather than what you believed was some sort of exclusive little evidence trove.
Edited by drlove, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
drlove Member (Idle past 818 days) Posts: 153 Joined: |
Words can be supernatural
|
|||||||||||||||||||
PaulK Member Posts: 17827 Joined: Member Rating: 2.3 |
I realise that a serious response is wasted on you.
quote: Infowars is about as bad as Worldnet Daily. Maybe worse. CNN is much better, although that’s damning with faint praise. Twitter and Facebook are full of user-generated content so it would depend on who generated the content. There are actual scientists on Twitter, certainly.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 421 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
No, I did not make anything up.
The Christian Cult of Ignorance is incapable of even comprehending what is evidence.My Website: My Website
|
|||||||||||||||||||
drlove Member (Idle past 818 days) Posts: 153 Joined: |
You thought you got to declare what was good or bad, true or false??! Try to debate seriously.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024