|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 61 (9209 total) |
| |
The Rutificador chile | |
Total: 919,503 Year: 6,760/9,624 Month: 100/238 Week: 17/83 Day: 0/0 Hour: 0/0 |
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: The Power of the New Intelligent Design... | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MrIntelligentDesign Member (Idle past 566 days) Posts: 248 Joined: |
Where did you get that CONCLUSIONS from yours? Do you have any link to even show the definition of intelligence to non-intelligence, before u could talk to intelligent designer?? Give me the link...if not SHUT UP..
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tangle Member Posts: 9581 From: UK Joined: Member Rating: 6.4 |
MrID writes: Am I talking religious people or religious freaks here or scientists or science-lovers??I think supporters of EVOLUTION are becoming religious freaks because they had no power from Darwin to counter me... Real scientist do not insult. Real scientist study and rebut, if dis-agree... Real science deals with observation and evidence. Show us something that was intelligently designed. Edited by Tangle, : No reason given.Je suis Charlie. Je suis Ahmed. Je suis Juif. Je suis Parisien. I am Mancunian. I am Brum. I am London.I am Finland. Soy Barcelona "Life, don't talk to me about life" - Marvin the Paranoid Android "Science adjusts it's views based on what's observed.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 97 days) Posts: 34140 From: Texas!! Joined: |
Are you trying to intentionally appear as stupid as your posts indicate?
Before anyone can rebut your nonsense you need to actually present something. There is ZERO evidence of any designer, much less any intelligent designer. Until there is some evidence of any designer, in particular any evidence the designer has any intelligence, this whole thread is simply an example of the Christian Cult of Willful Ignorance Mental masturbation. You are the one claiming that some designer exists and that the designer is intelligent. It is up to you to present the evidence to support your position. Bring the evidence that there is some designer and that the designer is intelligent and present that evidence here. Do you even know what evidence would be or mean?My Website: My Website
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AZPaul3 Member Posts: 8654 From: Phoenix Joined: Member Rating: 6.6 |
How can you differentiate a created X to an un-created X Your questions from the OP were answered in Message 4. Are you going to answer mine? How do you differentiate a created X from an natural X?Eschew obfuscation. Habituate elucidation.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MrIntelligentDesign Member (Idle past 566 days) Posts: 248 Joined: |
I've already answered that in my link...and more..
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tangle Member Posts: 9581 From: UK Joined: Member Rating: 6.4 |
MrID writes: I've already answered that in my link...and more.. We don't argue by link here. Present your evidence. Show us something intelligently designed. It would be great if you could also show us the designer too but one step at a time.Je suis Charlie. Je suis Ahmed. Je suis Juif. Je suis Parisien. I am Mancunian. I am Brum. I am London.I am Finland. Soy Barcelona "Life, don't talk to me about life" - Marvin the Paranoid Android "Science adjusts it's views based on what's observed.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AZPaul3 Member Posts: 8654 From: Phoenix Joined: Member Rating: 6.6
|
I'm not going to read your self-serving narcissistic tome.
Present your argument here within the post. How do YOU tell a natural object from a manufactured one? What criteria do you use? I already stated mine in Message 4. Write it up and bring it here in a forum message, not in some off-site opus. Failure to do so will show your lack of evidence for your proposal. Edited by AZPaul3, : No reason given.Eschew obfuscation. Habituate elucidation.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tanypteryx Member Posts: 4597 From: Oregon, USA Joined: Member Rating: 9.1
|
I've already answered that in my link...and more.. No you didn't. your link is a great steaming pile of bullshit and more!What if Eleanor Roosevelt had wings? -- Monty Python One important characteristic of a theory is that is has survived repeated attempts to falsify it. Contrary to your understanding, all available evidence confirms it. --Subbie If evolution is shown to be false, it will be at the hands of things that are true, not made up. --percy The reason that we have the scientific method is because common sense isn't reliable. -- Taq
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MrIntelligentDesign Member (Idle past 566 days) Posts: 248 Joined: |
WHAT???? Have you lost your mind?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PaulK Member Posts: 17919 Joined: Member Rating: 6.6
|
quote: Having read some of your material, I think you are in great need of psychiatric help.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tanypteryx Member Posts: 4597 From: Oregon, USA Joined: Member Rating: 9.1
|
WHAT???? Have you lost your mind? Nope!!!!! I know exactly where it is.What if Eleanor Roosevelt had wings? -- Monty Python One important characteristic of a theory is that is has survived repeated attempts to falsify it. Contrary to your understanding, all available evidence confirms it. --Subbie If evolution is shown to be false, it will be at the hands of things that are true, not made up. --percy The reason that we have the scientific method is because common sense isn't reliable. -- Taq
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AZPaul3 Member Posts: 8654 From: Phoenix Joined: Member Rating: 6.6 |
So, again, MrID, how do YOU tell a natural object from a manufactured one? What criteria do you use?
Eschew obfuscation. Habituate elucidation.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sarah Bellum Member (Idle past 854 days) Posts: 826 Joined: |
What it comes down to is did the various generations of life over the past few billions of years produce offspring by the usual birth (or hatching or spawning or whatever bacteria do to split from one cell into two descendants) or was there some miraculous instance of creation every time a slightly different creature (or plant, etc.) grew up to walk (or crawl, swim, etc.) on our planet?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MrIntelligentDesign Member (Idle past 566 days) Posts: 248 Joined: |
quote: That is a very good question!!! Simple and yet very strong!!! That is the very FIRST question in talking about the origin of everything, even the origin of species! Darwin and all of evolution supporters should first answer that before they conclude EVOLUTION!!! Well, before I answer, how EVOLUTION answer that question? You know, EVOLUTION is famous, I am not, evolution is being used in almost all schools, mine is not yet, Evolution receive money and grants, I am not... then, let the MAJOR science like Evolution answer that FIRST... Well, if you read my science books, you could probably know that answer from me... but let us compare for educational purposes...and see if EVOLUTION has the best scientific explanation...
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MrIntelligentDesign Member (Idle past 566 days) Posts: 248 Joined: |
Generations over life (time), or say change over time, is always controlled for if not, all living organisms will die. Which means, they are not evolving...as in origin of species and they are not evolving, as in change of species...
All living organisms are just interrelating (intelligently relating) for if not, they will die.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024