Scientific Falsification of the Theory of Evolution (ToE) and Introducing ToE’s Replacement
From the time of Bishop Samuel Wilberforce on 1860 AD to 2022 AD, many scientists had tried to falsify the Theory of Evolution (ToE) or Biological Evolution, but all of them had failed. This will be your first time to hear the reasons of their failures from this article. In this article, I will be showing you how to scientifically falsify the Theory of Evolution (ToE), and will be introducing you the new model as replacement. The new model is Biological Interrelation, BiTs, based on testable reality, by using scientific and testable analytical method, using the discovered scientific differences between intelligence (intentional) to non-intelligence (non-intentional), from the new Intelligent Design . The author hopes that through this article, all scientists will learn on the importance of falsification, on how to falsify correctly, on how to correctly explain reality and on how to give correct/testable falsification criteria for any scientific explanation presented. This article is subdivided into five main topics: (Part 1) Realistically, what is really the Theory of Evolution (ToE)? (Part 2) How did some scientists falsify ToE and what are the invented falsification criteria for Biological Evolution or ToE? (Part 3) What are the Problems and Inconsistencies of ToE? Why ToE is Wrong? (Part 4) The correct Scientific Falsification of Theory of Evolution (ToE) and (Part 5) The replacement and its major explanations.
In falsifying Evolution, it is like Einstein falsifying or upgrading Newton's idea of GRAVITY. It was Limited vs Whole.
One of best examples of limited vs broad/whole explanations is between Newton versus Einstein on GRAVITY. Newton could never completely explain reality when dealing with gravity and space and time, therefore limited. Einstein had made the explanation wider (broad/whole reality) by using Einstein’s General Relativity (GR) that could explain and predict correctly. Limited versus whole/broad reality, same here. Which predicts that some explanations of ToE will retain. (The normal and technical naming and nomenclatures, some confirmed mechanisms of change but always controlled, and almost all technical terms used in Biology and its related fields, should be retained. But anything that has connection with ToE, evolution and Darwin, must be discarded and replaced, considered pseudo-science, unless the topics are criticizing them.)
Thank you. I think that I should make a summary of it.
I think this one will work.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scientific Falsification of the Theory of Evolution (ToE) and Introducing ToE's Replacement
In science, a wrong theory or explanation must be falsified and be replaced. In here, I falsified Evolution because Evolution is wrong. Science must talk and explain reality, but Evolution is not discussing reality for the following reasons:
1, Wrong basis of reality. Non-intentional change is wrong since biological cell is intellen; 2. Limited Scope of reality in biology. Biological living organisms are dealing with reality in broader scope, then expected; 3. No exclusive explanation. There are no exclusive explanations when the change is non-intentional since those changes could also be seen in intentional change; 4. Natural Methodological inconsistency. If there are two or more competing scenarios, they must be settled first before concluding which is the best scenario as seen in reality. Evolution has nothing on this.
The method or tool used in falsification and replacement is from the new Intelligent Design and all of discoveries. And the replacement is called Biological Interrelation Theory that is broader and wider in scope than Evolution. Thus, Evolution is not only falsified but replaced.
You said nothing intelligible, so I'll provide no feedback other than that. It's not my job to help you make sense - you're on you're own. If and when you do post something intelligible I will provide useful feedback.