Reason: I discovered the topic of intelligence and non-intelligence, and I can basically categorize all topics in Biology or anything.
You "discovered" the wrong property. Instead, what is important is something's
Googliness. If you cannot show how
Googly something is, then you have nothing.
You are obviously far too stupid to even detect something's
Googliness let alone identify and describe it -- though of course
Googliness is one of those properties that when you do attempt to describe it then you have lost it.
So until you are able to start crawling out of your self-imposed deep hole of ignorance, stupidity, and
non-Googly nature, please answer these simple questions:
- What is evolution? Do not simply copy-and-paste the crap that you wrote in your "article", because that's not what it is. Instead of plagiarizing yourself, provide an honest answer.
HINT: This would be similar to Admin's repeated requests for you to summarize your "falsification of evolution" (refer Message 2, Message 4, and Message 6 in your proposed EVOLUTION IS FALSIFIED!!!!!!!), which you have proven incapable of doing (a sure sign that you do not understand what you had yourself written -- assuming that you had not plagiarized it from another creationist).
- How does evolution work? Present and describe evolutionary processes and how they work. Please try to be as detailed as you can be. Presenting it as a step-by-step process would work best. Correlating evolutionary processes with how life itself works is desirable.
- Where in how evolution works (ie, Question #2) is an external intelligence required? Furthermore, which parts in how evolution works would not work if and external intelligence does not impose itself? Isn't that fundamental to the entire idea of "intelligent design"? So where is it needed and where is it not needed?
For example, if reproduction is one of the steps of how evolution works, is the intervention of an intelligence required or not required?
I will remind you that in order for you to falsify evolution,
you must understand it! That means that
you must know what evolution is and how evolution works. If you are ignorant of those two things, then there is no way you could ever possibly falsify evolution.
Please stop ignoring General Sun Tzu's teaching and instead heed it:
quote:
Sun Tzu, Scroll III (Offensive Strategy):
31. Therefore I say: "Know the enemy and know yourself; in a hundred battles you will never be in peril.
32. When you are ignorant of the enemy but know yourself, your chances of winning or losing are equal.
33. If ignorant both of your enemy and of yourself, you are certain in every battle to be in peril."
(Sun Tzu The Art of War, translation by Samuel B. Griffith, Oxford University Press, 1963)
You are ignorant both of your enemy and of yourself, so you are certain in every battle to be in peril. As has been demonstrated repeatedly and consistently on this forum.
I challenge anybody to fight with me intellectually, to rediscover intelligence, write in Zenodo, with experiment and compare with me. Anybody who could beat me on this topic of intelligence will surely make me stupid and moron, and I will say sorry to all and unpublish all my articles and books.
Translation:
quote:
I challenge anybody to fight with me intellectually, to rediscover purple gremlin juice (which is what makes everything in the universe work), write in Zenodo, with experiment and compare with me. Anybody who could beat me on this topic of purple gremlin juice will surely make me stupid and moron, and I will say sorry to all and unpublish all my articles and books.
Your entire thesis and its execution are complete and utter bullshit. In order to refute bullshit, it is only necessary to expose that bullshit as bullshit. There is no requirement to create the same bullshit (eg, your purple gremlin juice) yourself. It
is a very good idea to understand that bullshit as thoroughly as possible, but unfortunately it is in the nature of bullshit to be incomprehensible, especially to rational minds. Rather, bullshit can be understood only by the mind (or facsimile thereof) of the
bullshitter himself, though even then even the bullshitter himself is unable to understand his own bullshit (
you yourself being an obvious case of that situation, which is why you are unable to summarize your "falsification").
And we have been trying argue with you
intellectually, but unfortunately you have proven yourself to
not be up to that challenge. It is very difficult for an intelligent person, such as we are, to argue intellectually with a willfully ignorant blithering idiot, such as you.
Anyone? Call all your best scientists and join them together as one big force, and let us intellectually fight. Let us see who will win.
Refer to the previous section:
DWise1 writes:
And we have been trying argue with you
intellectually, but unfortunately you have proven yourself to
not be up to that challenge. It is very difficult for an intelligent person, such as we are, to argue intellectually with a willfully ignorant blithering idiot, such as you.
Face it. You are simply not up to the task.
EVOLUTION HAS BEEN FALSIFIED!
Please stop lying!
™ Version 4.2
(1)