The Power of the New Intelligent Design...

What is evolution? Simply put, evolution is non-intentional change in biological world.

had to correct the spelling of lightbub

AZPaul3 writes:What is IDv2’s first move?

ID's failure to take into account naturally occurring complexity by trying to equate complexity with "design" even though naturally occurring complexity is so much more complex than designed complexity could ever hope to be. That would also include how the most common characteristic of a product of evolutionary processes is high levels of complexity, such that if you find something in nature that is highly complex then that is evidence that it had evolved.
ID's fatal confusion of science's practice of methodological materialism ("We are incapable of working with the supernatural, so we do not include it.") with philosophical materialism ("The natural universe is all there is.").
ID's political and social agenda to transform science by forcing it to include the supernatural. Their motivation in pushing that travesty comes from the previous point in which they are unable to understand how science works.
ID having to always resort to explaining everything away with "God Did It" (AKA "goddidit"). More specifically, they point out how highly complex something is such that they have difficulty explaining it completely, so they jump to their go-to "conclusion" of "goddidit".
Of course, that "answer" not only answers nothing at all, but it also blocks any further investigation of that question. As we discussed in my topic, So Just How is ID's Supernatural-based Science Supposed to Work? (SUM. MESSAGES ONLY), "goddidit" effectively kills science.ID's worship of the God of the Gaps. This view argues that finding natural explanations for things works to disprove God, which would mean that our inability to explain something works to prove God. That would lead to an agenda which strives to preserve ignorance and to impede the growth of knowledge. Note that this worship of the God of the Gaps is also quite common among YECs.

I still cannot understand anything MrID is talking about. He needs to define his terms before he starts using them.

ANSWER: Use the Universal Boundary Line (UBL) from the new ID.

ANSWER: I do not know the "thing = X", so the only tool for categorization of the "thing = X" is your basic sensory systems. Then, look for any features (X') on that X resembled similar to human design, since humans always compare all X to humans made X. Start from that, then, as you dig further about X, you can just eliminate all human-made-error of X' that you have listed,In the UBL, it states that ifintellen, then, you could find two or more supports/features (X') to that X. If not, if naturen, the X' will become 1, the X is natural (non-intelligently designed).