The Power of the New Intelligent Design...

Logic is of no use when trying to understand cosmological problems. You need maths Terrible move, lazy. There's no reason to assume this - unless of course you'd care to give us one. Again 'sense' has nothing to do with it. Pretty much everything we currently know about the universe makes no sense in the normal usage. The only way everyday people make sense of it is what people have done for thousands of years and that's make up human stories about it. Gods are useful - they fill in the holes where knowledge is absent.Civilisations have made up thousands of stories and are still doing it - Mormons spring to mind. The stories people believe are almost always the ones they were brought up to believe in. There's no known case of anyone believing in a god that they had never heard of - a child born to Muslim parents does not spontaneously believe in Jesus Christ.Logic and belief have nothing to do with the physical understanding of the universe. Personally, I've no idea why we imagine us evolved apes have any kind of chance of working this shit out- we just do our best and we've only being trying for a couple of hundred years. Haven't even started.Edited by Tangle, : No reason given.

Oh, please. Tell me, what's logical about quantum theory? By logic here I'm meaning our ability to simply think philosophically about a problem and hope to solve it. The universe is not something that makes normal, logical sense. Fuck off, if you have a point to make, make it.

Below are the invented explanations in forensic science, that have no part in reality:
​
1. The pattern of blood stains on the wall
2. The knife found in the body
3. The defence wounds on the victim's arms and hands
4. The broken window showing the attacker's entry point
5. The bloody footprints leaving the scene
​
..for they assumed that the conclusion that the victim is daed and has been murdered is correct.
​
Forensic science is wrong for it cannot explain if the change is really natural or not...What you've listed are a number of evidences that demonstrate the truth of evolution, you muppet. You don't even know that you're doing it.

Nested hierarchies
If different species share common ancestors, we would expect living things to be related to one another in what scientists refer to as nested hierarchies — rather like nested boxes. This is indeed what we observe in the living world and in the fossil record. When we study their traits, species naturally cluster into groups based on suites of similar, inherited traits (i.e., homologies). And they don’t just cluster into groups. They cluster into groups within groups within groups…etc. This observation makes most sense if we understand that, over time, lineages have split and formed new species, which then split and formed even more species, and so on, passing down traits and generating the branching structure that is the Tree of Life. An example is illustrated below.There's more explanation hereNested hierarchies - Understanding EvolutionThat site - which is run by the University of California Museum of Paleontology (UCMP) - also provides other lines of evidence for the ToE. It's a 101 so it shouldn't trouble you too much.

This new idea of common descent and nested hierarchies.1837 Anytime you want to start showing us where this is wrong, we're all ears. Just at the moment you're being very boring.

And don't forget the grocery clerk that's re-imagining new monetary policy and fiat currencies.To be close to such precocious talent is indeed a rare privilege.