|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 61 (9209 total) |
| |
The Rutificador chile | |
Total: 919,503 Year: 6,760/9,624 Month: 100/238 Week: 17/83 Day: 0/8 Hour: 0/0 |
Thread ▼ Details |
Member (Idle past 124 days) Posts: 3645 From: Indianapolis, IN Joined: |
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: When Will The End-Times Be And How Will We Know? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tanypteryx Member Posts: 4597 From: Oregon, USA Joined: Member Rating: 9.2 |
so I will publically state what I believe is 85% certain to happen in at least some measure. So, 85% of at least some. That's 29% better than every biblical prophesy!Stop Tzar Vladimir the Condemned! What if Eleanor Roosevelt had wings? -- Monty Python One important characteristic of a theory is that is has survived repeated attempts to falsify it. Contrary to your understanding, all available evidence confirms it. --Subbie If evolution is shown to be false, it will be at the hands of things that are true, not made up. --percy The reason that we have the scientific method is because common sense isn't reliable. -- Taq
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AZPaul3 Member Posts: 8654 From: Phoenix Joined: Member Rating: 6.7 |
I've not been thru the math completely but as far as significant digits I'm wondering if you didn't round the wrong way.
Stop Tzar Vladimir the Condemned!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tanypteryx Member Posts: 4597 From: Oregon, USA Joined: Member Rating: 9.2 |
He's doing something the wrong way.
Stop Tzar Vladimir the Condemned! What if Eleanor Roosevelt had wings? -- Monty Python One important characteristic of a theory is that is has survived repeated attempts to falsify it. Contrary to your understanding, all available evidence confirms it. --Subbie If evolution is shown to be false, it will be at the hands of things that are true, not made up. --percy The reason that we have the scientific method is because common sense isn't reliable. -- Taq
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
dwise1 Member Posts: 6077 Joined: Member Rating: 7.2 |
Sorry, dwise1. Just because you fail to see candle2's mathematics professor's model doesn't mean he doesn't have one. I think what is going on with the_wickless_one is that he has no clue what that prof was trying to demonstrate:
If you have the probabilities of n independent events (P1, P2, ... , Pn), then the probability of all of those events would be the product of the events' probabilities (ie, P = P1 × P2 × ... × Pn). And of course if each event's probability is the same as all the others', then you raise that probability to the power of the number of events: P = Pin . I seem to recall that's called a joint probability, but it's been four decades so I don't quite remember the terminology. For example:
The probability of getting tails in a single flip of a fair coin is ½ (0.5). The probability of getting tails 10 times in a row would be 0.510 = 0.0009765625 -- 1/1024.
The probability of rolling a 4 on a single-sided die is one in six, ⅙ = 0.1667. The probability of rolling a 4 ten times in a row is (⅙)10 = 1.6538 × 10-8.
So the prof's point would not have been how probable it would be for a prediction to be fulfilled, but rather how the probability of multiple predictions all coming true shrinks rapidly as the number of those predictions increase. A realistic math model for arriving at the probability of a single prediction would be extremely difficult to construct. Therefore, I have no doubt that the prof just pulled a number out of his ... hat. That is a perfectly valid thing to do when you are just trying to demonstrate the effects of multiple events. However, a probability of about 1/133 seems to be far too high for such an event. It would make sense for him to have a favorite magic number (like 42 for those of my generation -- Share and enjoy!). Perhaps that find structure constant is his favorite magic number. Of course, that completely begs the other question of whether those "prophecies" even qualify as legitimate prophecies. Or even qualify as having been legitimately fulfilled and not just faked -- eg, my successful prediction of last Saturday's lottery numbers would only count if I had written them down before last Saturday's draw and not the day after. Aron Ra discusses this in his YouTube video, Unfulfilling Prophecy , which I so generously embedded in my Message 731 for wickless' benefit.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AnswersInGenitals Member (Idle past 407 days) Posts: 673 Joined:
|
I seem to recall that's called a joint probability, but it's been four decades so I don't quite remember the terminology. It's been almost six decades since I studied statistics, but I remember everything I learned because I have perfect recall. In fact, I can't think of a single thing that I've forgotten. But, the key thing that you are leaving out of your analysis is conditional probability for which you have to apply Bayesian statistics. So, in the case you consider of trying to roll a 4 with a six sided die, the probability of getting a 4 is indeed 1/6 ~ 0.16667 if you are an atheist. However, if you are a devout Christian, like candle2, and you add the condition of sincere prayer you can raise the probability to as high as 0.7346. The power of prayer has a multiplicative factor of 1 to 46378 (depending on which god you pray to). If you are an Ancient Greek and pray to the demigoddess Diana, you can only raise the odds to 0.1669 since Diana, being a demigoddess, has limited powers. However, if you are an Ancient Greek, then your are dead and those odds of rolling preferred numbers on dice is the least of your worries. These are all true facts. You can look them up. The real question here is why are you letting some ignorant schmuck take up any of your time! (I'm referring to candle2, not myself.)Edited by AnswersInGenitals, .
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
dwise1 Member Posts: 6077 Joined: Member Rating: 7.2 |
So, in the case you consider of trying to roll a 4 with a six sided die, the probability of getting a 4 is indeed 1/6 ~ 0.16667 if you are an atheist. However, if you are a devout Christian, like candle2, and you add the condition of sincere prayer you can raise the probability to as high as 0.7346. The power of prayer has a multiplicative factor of 1 to 46378 (depending on which god you pray to). So in other words, theists insist that they are playing with loaded dice, so normal math no longer applies. This is also one of the reasons why mixing gods with science doesn't work. What science discovers must hold true regardless of one's gods. If you mix certain chemicals together under a certain set of conditions, then the resultant reaction(s) must not depend on which god you offered which particular prayer (up to and most definitely including the "correct" sect's prescribed number of fingers to be used in that invocation's prescribed hand gesture -- see Раскол). IOW, when you bake a cake, it should not depend on your gods. But once you insist on including gods and religious intervention into science, you screw everything up. Science sees that there are things in the physical universe that we can depend on; religion insists that the universe is chaotic, inconsistent, and capricious.
The real question here is why are you letting some ignorant schmuck take up any of your time! (I'm referring to candle2, not myself.) Because he is typical and even archetypical of "true Christians". Dishonest hypocrites who know no lie too audacious nor dirty trick too low and underhanded to ever pass up. He has done nothing here except to spout one lie after another and to do everything possible to avoid any and all attempts at discussion. There are still so many questions that he has yet to answer, including why he claims that trace C-14 recently formed in subterranean formations through local radiation sources is supposed to have anything to do with radiocarbon dating methods which only uses atmospheric C-14. He needs to stop running away and start to engage in discussion. Of course, his evil theology will not allow that.
ABE: IOW, we need to urge candle2, eWolf, Mike-the-Whizzer, etc, to become honest. Since all the evidence we have observed demonstrates conclusively that there is no such thing as an honest creationist, then we have almost no hope of succees. But we must still make the effort nonetheless. It's been said that one should not try to teach a pig to sing: you will never succeed and, beside, it annoys the pig. It has also been said that sometimes annoying the pig is the objective of that evolution.Edited by dwise1, : ABE
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AnswersInGenitals Member (Idle past 407 days) Posts: 673 Joined: |
This is also one of the reasons why mixing gods with science doesn't work. What science discovers must hold true regardless of one's gods. If you mix certain chemicals together under a certain set of conditions, then the resultant reaction(s) must not depend on which god you offered which particular prayer Then how do you explain the well documented transmogrification of wheat/wine to flesh/blood during the Eucharist?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Greatest I am Member (Idle past 530 days) Posts: 1676 Joined: |
AnswersInGenitals
Love the name. The reply does not seem to go with it. Care to share some of that documentation? RegardsDL
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AZPaul3 Member Posts: 8654 From: Phoenix Joined: Member Rating: 6.7 |
Ask any priest. They will quote you chapter and verse as well as provide copious documents come down through church history on the majik the liturgy invokes.
Stop Tzar Vladimir the Condemned!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
dwise1 Member Posts: 6077 Joined: Member Rating: 7.2
|
A good quote I heard which I cannot verify because Hulu won't let me view past episodes of The Orville:
quote
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NosyNed Member Posts: 9012 From: Canada Joined: |
Do you have an idea of the episode. I have them all
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
dwise1 Member Posts: 6077 Joined: Member Rating: 7.2 |
Season 3, Episode 2, "Shadow Realms", dropped on Hulu on June 9, 2022:
quote For some reason, Hulu will only let me rewatch the third episode. The scene is where they are discussing the Krill's warnings of demons, CAPT Mercer says that he'd tried to study the Krill religion but found it confusing, to which VADM Christie marked that up to job security for priests.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NosyNed Member Posts: 9012 From: Canada Joined: |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
dwise1 Member Posts: 6077 Joined: Member Rating: 7.2
|
In the matter of what we must require of claims of fulfilled prophecy, I listed in Message 726 (to which this is a reply since candle2 is conspicuously MIA) some of those requirements as I recalled from Aron Ra's video, Unfulfilling Prophecy .
One that I had left out is the requirement that the "prophecy" not being about something that had already happened before the writing down of the "prophecy". Though it looks like I did touch on that point with:
DWise1 writes: For example, I could claim that I can successfully predict the winning PowerBall numbers. To prove that I can, I will post the winning numbers after they have been posted. Would you believe in my incredible powers of prophecy? Of course not! Just now watching Viced Rhino's new video ( Atheists Admit Secrets That Atheists Never Admit!!! -- video refused to embed). Circa 36:00 he mentions that there are books of prophecy in the Bible that we can date by when the prophecies go from being accurate to being wrong. That would mean that the book was written around the time that it went from being accurate to being wrong. No, he didn't give examples here because that was an aside from critiquing a fundamentalist video misrepresenting atheists. ABE:Makes me feel like Jesus in the story of the parables where he tells the crowd the stories (as parables in order to keep anyone from understanding what he's saying), but then he has to pull his disciples off to the side afterwards to explain everything to them. The reason why those books of prophecy Viced Rhino is talking about start off with accurate prophecies and then the prophecies all go wrong is simple: the earlier prophecies are all retrodictions, things that had already happened. Once it got to things that had not yet happened, none of the prediction got it right.Edited by dwise1, : ABE Edited by dwise1, . Edited by dwise1, .
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
dwise1 Member Posts: 6077 Joined: Member Rating: 7.2 |
Belated thanks (sorry about that).
The Hulu GUI for Roku finally started working right. GUIs can be so messy to try to use at times, but I guess that's why they're called that.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024