Michael MD writes:
The Ether Model within this Thread deserves serious consideration as an alternative to standard physics theory.
You keep saying that but it still isn't true. No, every hare-brained idea does NOT "deserve" scientific consideration.
Michael MD writes:
Where else is there a detailed scientific model ranging from first cause through creation to our present world?
You have no "detailed scientific model" without some connection to the real world. Science requires
evidence.
Michael MD writes:
In courts of law, circumstantial evidence reaches a point where it at least deserves to be seriously considered.
Then go sell it in a court of law. Science is not a court of law. The principles that govern a court of law have no significance here.
"I call that bold talk for a one-eyed fat man!"
-- Lucky Ned Pepper
™ Version 4.2