Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9163 total)
8 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,417 Year: 3,674/9,624 Month: 545/974 Week: 158/276 Day: 32/23 Hour: 2/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Destiny/Free Will
Mister Pamboli
Member (Idle past 7598 days)
Posts: 634
From: Washington, USA
Joined: 12-10-2001


Message 17 of 28 (8991)
04-26-2002 1:43 AM
Reply to: Message 16 by Philip
04-26-2002 1:06 AM


quote:
Originally posted by Philip:
Skinner ... The 'Calvinist' of behavioral psychology, he believed we are governed by our observed environment like rats in the experimental maze. I would think that mutationalists would follow the same religion ...
I seem to remember you use mutationalist in place of evolutionist. In this case I would say you are wrong, though perhaps not entirely.
Firstly you would be wrong to generalise about the behaviourist theories of evolutionists or to deduce any necessary behavioural theory from the theory of evolution.
Nevertheless, in the study of gene expression, there is a danger of genetic determinism: of believing that genes which may influence behaviour do so in a way that is consistently expressed. Such a view is too simplistic to be honestly held by all but the most crippingly narrow-minded scientist. That the public may be influenced in the direction of determinism by talk of "gay genes" or "aggresive genes" is a indictment of science's greatest failing - the failure to communicate its methods and findings clearly.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 16 by Philip, posted 04-26-2002 1:06 AM Philip has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 18 by Philip, posted 04-26-2002 5:36 AM Mister Pamboli has replied

  
Mister Pamboli
Member (Idle past 7598 days)
Posts: 634
From: Washington, USA
Joined: 12-10-2001


Message 19 of 28 (9012)
04-26-2002 5:02 PM
Reply to: Message 18 by Philip
04-26-2002 5:36 AM


quote:
Originally posted by Philip:
I 'compulsively' study the science of a 'Christ-God crucified', because it is (without excuse) greatly inferred by observation in nature.
I think it would be interesting to see more of what you mean by the science of a 'Christ-God crucified'- could you expand on some aspects of this that relate to obvservations from nature?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 18 by Philip, posted 04-26-2002 5:36 AM Philip has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 21 by Philip, posted 04-29-2002 12:02 AM Mister Pamboli has replied

  
Mister Pamboli
Member (Idle past 7598 days)
Posts: 634
From: Washington, USA
Joined: 12-10-2001


Message 22 of 28 (9097)
04-29-2002 1:08 AM
Reply to: Message 21 by Philip
04-29-2002 12:02 AM


Thanks for posting Philip. I'm not sure I understand it, but I will read it through carefully and give it some thought.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 21 by Philip, posted 04-29-2002 12:02 AM Philip has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024