The Power of the New Intelligent Design...

If you ask me, the explanatory power of the theory of evolution is seriously overrated. For example, no Darwinist has ever offered me a sensible explanation for how venomous snakes evolved.How did their hollow fangs evolve? How did their poison glands evolve? How did the connection between their hollow fangs and their poison glands evolve?How did those snakes survive while the aforementioned system was evolving? Why did that system need to evolve at all, since the snakes had been surviving without it?

Personal incredulity does not override science.
Argument from incredulity - RationalWiki

That is your best explanation of how venomous snakes evolved? What a pathetic cop-out.

I do not have to explain. You have been given multiple possible scenarios. There is plenty of information on the subject on the internet. There are actual scientific papers(which you will dismiss because of your incredulity) on the subject. Here is a news article on one.
Snakes evolved venom fangs multiple times from wrinkles in their teeth | New Scientist
No matter what info and data are presented you just poo poo it and claim it is not evidence.
You are just a troll, that moves goalposts all over and off the field.
All you have is ignorance and logical fallacies. None of your arguments(Correction, you have no arguments) are new. We have seen them before. It is time for the admin and mods to suspend you for a little bit to see if you will come back and discuss in good faith. I am sure you won't because all you are is a troll.

Darwinists don't have to explain anything - they just make up stories. Whoever comes up with the best story, wins. That article is a pathetic joke ... credulous atheist fools clutching at straws. It's not my fault that the theory of evolution is a simplistic nineteenth century idea that is hopelessly inadequate, and that Darwinists are too blind and stupid to see it. I've noticed that you call every creationist on this site a "troll". At least you're being consistent ...

No IDist has ever offered a sensible explanation for WHY a Designer would design poisonous snakes. Or parasitic worms.

The story that best fits the evidence wins. And isn't it funny that scientists from every religion agree on what the best story is? You're the one who's stuck in the nineteenth century. Read something up-to-date.

There will always be specific adaptations that we don't have a specific answer for. That's just the nature of science in general. No scientist is claiming they are omniscient, or that any theory can explain everything. That's why scientists continue to do research. Perhaps this is why you prefer religious explanations where people claim complete and dogmatic knowledge without needing to do things like have evidence or do the research.What you ignore is what evolution does explain. For example, it explains why we see more transitions than transversions when we compare the human and chimp genome. It explains why there is more sequence conservation in exons than in introns. It explains why we see a nested hierarchy. It explains the distribution of species across the globe. It explains the patterns found in the fossil record. It explains why we can find the same ERV's at the same bases in the genomes of multiple species. It can explain why the LTR's of those same ERV's diverge and produce a phylogeny. Evolution explains massive mountains of observations, most of which I suspect you aren't even aware of.

Anyone actually interested in discovering facts and answers would at least read the abstract to the original research. The article provides a link to it. We know you will never read it, as we also know you won't be able to comprehend it. A troll would just handwave it as propaganda.I have no reason to think any of the authors are atheists. Why would you? Are you going to use the No True Scotsman fallacy now?Yes, all of the creationists we have on this site are trolls. None of you provide actual evidence or a logical argument.
Even if evolution is shown to be false, that does not mean creationism is true. Then again the TOE is an extremely robust scientific theory and no one has presented any evidence or even a viable hypothesis to overturn it. You and kleinman are actually quite pitiful compared to others we have seen here.

No, it's not funny at all ... it's actually quite sad that otherwise intelligent people accept a scientific theory as dubious as ToE.

Well, until their research provides a sensible explanation of how venomous snakes evolved, for example, I will continue to consider ToE to be inadequate. Oh, you mean like the pattern evident in the Cambrian explosion, for example ... dozens of novel Phyla appearing relatively suddenly without any evidence of evolutionary ancestors?
LOL!! What Darwinists ignore is what ToE doesn't explain.

Isn't it funny that those "otherwise intelligent people" can cure diseases, get us to the moon and back, etc.? Why does it take an idiot like you to understand that the ToE is wrong?

]qs=Dredge]Well, until their research provides a sensible explanation of how venomous snakes evolved...[/qs] They have. Nobody cares what you think.

So even though there is mountains of evidence, you won't accept the theory because it doesn't have a very narrow explanation for one adaptation in one set of species. Got it. How do you determine that a fossil has no evolutionary ancestors?The theory of evolution predicts that we should find the earliest branches in the tree of life in the earliest fossil bearing strata. Wouldn't you know it, that's exactly what we see. What evidence are we ignoring?

Wow, this thread had discussed many things. Supposed to be, this is only for the Intelligent Design and its Arguments.Well, why God (as one of many ID candidates) designed snakes and worms, etc?Just to kill.If there is no sin or error of existence (error in intelligence), there will be no poisonous snakes or no killings...Intelligence gives life, violations of intelligence kill. Thus it predicts that there was a time in the history of humanity or earth that humans had violated intelligence and become stupid.Now, enjoy the First Argument of the Intelligent Design.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iAzPyb3ppcw&t=40s