Rebuttal To Creationists - "Since We Can't Directly Observe Evolution..."

Have you ever thought about responding with the correct explanation of how A → B and A → C are different from B → C?

We can have them contact you at "Department of Medicine, USA". Do you really think a monkey was on trial?

Kleinman:

---

Oh boy! We've got stereo and neither can explain how drug resistance evolves and why cancer treatments fail.

xongsmith:

---

Om...
​
OMG! the Stupid burns!

---

---

Oh my. Another poster to EvC that doesn't know how drug resistance evolves and why cancer treatments fail. To try and cures his ignorance, for a single selection pressure:
The basic science and mathematics of random mutation and natural selection
And for two or more simultaneous selection pressures:
The mathematics of random mutation and natural selection for multiple simultaneous selection pressures and the evolution of antimicrobial drug resistance
I doubt this will help because his education is limited to comic books.

Kleinman:

---

All you have to do is post one....

ringo:

---

All YOU have to do is read one. Anybody who is interested in the truth will read one or more of them and know that you are wrong.

---

---

ringo reads papers that don't exist. That's why he won't post them. If ringo could read, he would post the following papers that explain how drug resistance evolves and why cancer treatments fail. For a single selection pressure:
The basic science and mathematics of random mutation and natural selection
And for two or more multiple simultaneous selection pressures:
The mathematics of random mutation and natural selection for multiple simultaneous selection pressures and the evolution of antimicrobial drug resistance
See how easy it is ringo and you are so wrongo. Ask your horse, he has more sense than you have.
Message 2386

Kleinman:

---

Have you ever thought about responding with the correct explanation of how drug resistance evolves and why cancer treatments fail?

ringo:

---

Have you ever thought about responding with the correct explanation of how A → B and A → C are different from B → C?

---

---

Sure have cowpoke, read the above papers and find out how it works. Of course, your horse knows more math than you do. You will have to ask him to explain it to you.
Message 2387

Kleinman:

---

why don't you file a complaint with the medical or engineering board?

ringo:

---

We can have them contact you at "Department of Medicine, USA".

---

---

You can file the complaint where ever you want. Tell them I think you are psychotic because you believe that reptiles evolve into birds and fish evolve into mammals but you can't explain how drug resistance evolves and why cancer treatments fail. You only have the illusion that papers exist that explain this to you when the only papers that explain this, I have written. Tell them fossils tell you this is true, you have a conversation every day with them.

Kleinman:

---

We can redo the Scopes monkey trial where you are the monkey.

ringo:

---

Do you really think a monkey was on trial?

---

---

Auditions for the monkey part are still open. You can tell them how reptiles evolve into birds and fish evolve into mammals but you have no idea how drug resistance evolves and why cancer treatments fail. Tell them to read papers that don't exist, except mine. Biologists have been working on it for 60 years. They even have a very good experiment demonstrating how drug resistance evolves, but sadly, they never studied introductory probability theory and they don't understand the physics and mathematics of biological evolution. They have no horse sense, they've just been monkeying around.

Google thinks they exist I don't need to post them any more than I need to post links to demonstrate that France exists. They're there for anybody to see. Your "explanations" have been done to death in this topic. Nobody is impressed by your "explanations". You don't know my horse. Aren't you embarassed blathering about things you know nothing about? Nobody needs to read your papers to understand the simple math: A → B and A → C are different from B → C. You still don't know my horse. Read more carefully. My statement was not about where to file the complaint. It was about where they can find you. Even if I was wrong about that - and I have been trying to explain to you mathematically that your confusion about the math does not describe my belief - being wrong doesn't make me psychotic. Yes, we know. Nobody on earth understands but you. You didn't answer the question: Do you really think the Scopes Monkey Trial was about monkeys? I don't need to tell anybody that because they already know it isn't true. They can understand the simple math: A → B and A → C are different from B → C. You seem to be the only one who doesn't.

Kleinman:

---

ringo reads papers that don't exist.

ringo:

---

Google thinks they exist

---

---

So post the links. But you can't because they don't exist, except for these:
For a single selection pressure:
The basic science and mathematics of random mutation and natural selection
And for two or more simultaneous selection pressures:
The mathematics of random mutation and natural selection for multiple simultaneous selection pressures and the evolution of antimicrobial drug resistance
See how easy it is.

These are nothing more than the charlatan's pamphlets for sale at the back of the room. They are presented not for information or evidence but for click count.

SPAM, he's just posting spam AKA pig asses.

I haven't had spam, the meat product, since my kiddyhood days more than 100 years ago. I don't remember it.Made of cast-offs like any sausage. FDA approved from forever. And it's been on-and-off popular in world society since Hormel dropped its first can.I can imagine in large quantities over years the stuff being not-so-good for cardiac reasons but is it any good on the palate?I'm thinking of finding out. For the science, of course.

AZPaul3:

---

These are nothing more than the charlatan's pamphlets for sale at the back of the room. They are presented not for information or evidence but for click count.

---

Poor AZPaul3, he just doesn't like the correct explanation of how drug resistance evolves and why cancer treatments fail. It's because his bubble has burst.

Tanypteryx:

---

SPAM, he's just posting spam AKA pig asses.

---

This sure make Tany unhappy. It is so sad to when a bug chaser sees how biological evolution really works. You can explain how drug resistance evolves and why cancer treatments fail. To remind Tany, for a single selection pressure:
The basic science and mathematics of random mutation and natural selection
And for two or more simultaneous selection pressures:
The mathematics of random mutation and natural selection for multiple simultaneous selection pressures and the evolution of antimicrobial drug resistance
You didn't learn this chasing bugs or in your survey of physics course. Try not to be too upset when you learn how reality works, it's not good for your blood pressure. Perhaps you should do something you are good at like chasing bugs, science is too aggrevating for you.

Tanypteryx:

---

SPAM, he's just posting spam AKA pig asses.

AZPaul3:

---

I haven't had spam, the meat product, since my kiddyhood days more than 100 years ago. I don't remember it.
​
Made of cast-offs like any sausage. FDA approved from forever. And it's been on-and-off popular in world society since Hormel dropped its first can.
​
I can imagine in large quantities over years the stuff being not-so-good for cardiac reasons but is it any good on the palate?
​
I'm thinking of finding out. For the science, of course.

---

---

It looks like AZPaul3 has found his calling. Tany is a real inspiration but not so good on science. He would have to do better than social promotion in his survey of physics course.

. . . in asexual populations. Your title is incomplete.

Kleinman:

---

The basic science and mathematics of random mutation and natural selection

Taq:

---

. . . in asexual populations. Your title is incomplete.

---

---

You are wrong Taq, descent with modification works the same way for sexual replicators as it does with asexual replicators. The probability of an adaptive allele occurring depends on the number of replications of the allele and the mutation rate, nothing else. If you think otherwise, tell us why descent with modification is not the same for sexual replicators and asexual replicators.

Why should I do your homework for you?