False. It is evidence. It includes OBSERVATIONS!!!! You continue to avoid the evidence, as expected.
I also explained how we know that mutations aren't guided. Here it is again:
"For example, in the plate replica experiment we see that mutations that confer antibiotic resistance are not triggered by the presence of antibiotics. Instead, there are random mutations changing DNA without guidance, and some of those mutations just happen to produce antibiotic resistance."
If mutations were guided then nearly all of the mutations in the experiment would confer antibiotic resistance once the bacteria are exposed to antibiotics, but that's not what happens. The mutations happen randomly with respect to fitness. In other words, mutations are blind to the needs of the organism. That is what makes them unguided.
Once again, we have Scientific Method. In the links that you had given, they made/conducted an experiments and the
conclusion was that mutation, or simply, "change" was not guided. But how about the "control"? If you claimed guided X,
then, the "control" is unguided X, obviously. You must have both in experiment, or at least, you knew the two: guided X and
unguided X, beforehand. If you cannot provide the two, then, you are not following the Scientific Method.
Thus, you are violating science, thus, wrong. It is so simple, right?
So, the correct question would be: how do you tell/know between guided X to unguided X?
That's the entire point of science. You follow the evidence to a conclusion, and throw away the conclusions that aren't supported by evidence. You are the one who doesn't understand how science works. You seem to think science is just believing whatever you want to. That's not how it works.
You cannot have the correct conclusion if you do not have the correct experiment.
Evolution has answered that question. I have been giving you those answers for multiple posts now.
Please, use you intellectual mind, you too studied in schools, right? Then, use your mind.
Follow your own advice.
I do use my educational and intellectual mind, thus, I cannot accept your explanations since they are not part
of science. Thus, let us agree to something: do you have the dividing line or any lines between guided X to unguided X?
Please, be honest as professional.
For example, what is a freq allele or a frequency allele? Why can't you answer that question?
I am just making fun of supporters of Evolution since most of them are not good in details.
I had been talking with other people in many online forums, you are the fist one who noticed that,
meaning, that 98% of supporters of Evolution are really not good in details.
DETAIL IS POWER.
™ Version 4.2