Is ID falsifiable by any kind of experiment?

False again, typical dishonest evolutionist.

You think you know what evidence shows common descent? No. I doubt you know.I say you don't know. I say you know nothing.

Poor logic once more.

So show me where I am wrong. Be specific.

Not worth my time, noob!

So you can't show where I was wrong.You lie then hide away.It's ok. We expect this ugly behavior from creationists.

In the many replies from you, you showed low intelligence, so go bother some one else.

Hell, no. I'm here to bother you, sensei. I'm here to bother the ever-loving hell out of all the stupid religious intellectually brain-dead creationists and design dunces.You, as we have seen all through these messages, are dumb as a stump. I am on you and you ain't going anywhere.

Troll

Define logic.

Do you know what a noob is? I have not seen that used online in 20 years.

There are many different sources of evidence for common ancestry, sensei. Not all of them are equally strong, but they all lead to the same conclusion, namely that all life on earth is related. The latest and best evidence we currently have is DNA-sequencing, from which we can infer a very detailed phylogenetic tree. As it happens, this tree corroborates other earlier sources of evidence, such as the fossil record, or embryology, which yield less detailed but largely similar phylogenetic trees. The fact that different methods point to the same result, even before DNA-sequencing, is pretty strong evidence that the conclusion of common descent is warranted.

Except life on earth is not all related. Finding a tree pattern does not prove relationship even.

The science says it is. Where is the science wrong? Specifically, and how do you know? Do you have stronger science, more and stronger facts, than opposes you? Do you even know the facts against you?

I just told you.