from post 90 - This debate is experiencing wholesale denial of evidence posted after post one.
The problem is a room full of "debaters" who refuse to even recognize all that I have posted since post 1.
Willowtree...maybe you could tell me in WHICH of these posts, summarized below, did you post evidence???????
1. The following 8 facts must be assumed as facts or it is pointless to talk about the Resurrection. And the following 8 facts are progressively easier to prove than the Resurrection, that is, in sequence, starting with number 1 and ending with number 8, these 8 facts are easier to prove than the Resurrection.
1) Jesus lived
2) crucified a) by the Romans
b) instigated by certain Jewish leaders
3) considered dead
4) buried in a known accessible tomb
5) preached; raised, ascended, and an empty tomb
6) Jewish leaders concerned to disprove
7) persecution of disciples for claiming He raised
8) empty tomb/Jewish leaders position at stake.
These 8 things must be assumed as fact, as they are, starting from number 1 being the most easy to prove, with number 8 being the hardest to prove, and of course the Resurrection itself to be the most difficult to prove
4. listed three 2nd and possibly 3rd century texts and called Chip a know nothing, mouthing ignorance
5. told me you weren’t ignoring me.
12. answered to AdminBrian on the ad homenim from post 4.
13. asked me if I wanted book titles about the apostles.
14. explained the texts from post 4 and called them 1st thru 2nd century.
16. retracted insult from 4. rant on Jesus Seminar.
18. discussed regaining God sense with Rand.
23. told PaulK to read post 16.
24. told Ned that part of the NT was found in Qumran 7
26. more about Q7 and Theide and the JS not believing in miracles
30. again make the checkmate evidence claim.
32. more about miracles and myths
37. telling me you don’t know what I am asking for. And asking US to prove you wrong
42. telling Schraf that you have no trouble believing the miracle claims of other religionstwo possible sources: god or satan
45. telling Chip that things have to be assumed in any debatemaking martyr claim again
46. short post on Q7 again
47. telling Ned about two sources of miracle again: god or satan
48. talk about miracles with Chip
49. disputing Crash about martyrs of other religions
50. laughing at Ned’s talk of aliens.
59. long post accusing everyone of lying concerning knowledge of the apostles and their deaths..hundreds of sites a fact that every honest and intelligent and educated person knows again requiring the 8 assumptions
60. telling Brian to read 59.
61. saying that if Jesus rose then everything he said is validated to be truetalking about witchdoctors in Haiti and Africa
62. short post to Crash about his saying that Atheism changed his life for the bettershort point about 11 losers becoming 11 men of iron
64. told me to read three apologetics and listen to some sermons by Scott (I replied asking for the references these books had and asking for specifics on the sermons you meant)
65. sort of apologized to me concerning the ad homenims in 59.
72. quote I never said I didn’t know where or how each were
martyred.
73. calling Hitchy ignorant about myth statement
77. again claim to KNOW this evidence and refusal to give itclaims of dishonesty in your opponents
83. said There is no avoidance claim to have answered my questions alreadymore claims of dishonesty
90. claim of denial of evidence posted after post one claims
of revision
98. telling N-lighter to read an apologetic by Sherlock
99. argument with PaulK about John and Alexander.
100. claims of ..a room full of debaters who refuse to even recognize all you have posted since post 1.
101. claims of massive and voluminous amount of evidence that you again refuse to divulgetalk of dishonesty again
Asgara
"Embrace the pain, spank your inner moppet, whatever....but get over it"
™ Version 4.2
