Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9163 total)
7 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,417 Year: 3,674/9,624 Month: 545/974 Week: 158/276 Day: 32/23 Hour: 2/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Abiogenesis
NosyNed
Member
Posts: 9003
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003


Message 5 of 142 (90896)
03-07-2004 1:28 AM
Reply to: Message 4 by Trump won
03-07-2004 12:57 AM


evidence
But just because inorganic matter is found in our bodies is that considered good evidence?
I don't think it is. The processes are very different.
However, a point that can be taken from that is there is no reason to think that abiogeneisis can't occur. That is, there is a smooth connection from non living things, through things which aren't alive but act like it a bit to really liveing things.
Also just because we don't know something is, historically, a reallly , really bad reason for ascribing it to a god. So far it has always turned out to be a wrong idea. If I was at all religious I sure wouldn't want to hang my beliefs on that one.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by Trump won, posted 03-07-2004 12:57 AM Trump won has not replied

NosyNed
Member
Posts: 9003
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003


Message 8 of 142 (90939)
03-07-2004 11:44 AM
Reply to: Message 7 by 1.61803
03-07-2004 11:24 AM


Not abiogenesis
I agree with Crashfrog's post that anytime a living creature incorporates nonliving matter into its structure abiogenesis occurs
I would have to strongly disagree. That is a misuse of the term 'abiogenesis'. As Crash noted it is an interesting point of view but it is not what abiogenesis means.
(and as a minor nitpick, in this forum, you are misusing the word 'miraculous' too. )
[This message has been edited by NosyNed, 03-07-2004]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 7 by 1.61803, posted 03-07-2004 11:24 AM 1.61803 has not replied

NosyNed
Member
Posts: 9003
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003


Message 106 of 142 (98600)
04-08-2004 1:27 AM
Reply to: Message 102 by Muhd
04-07-2004 7:23 PM


Think about it
Also,
If there was no or little oxygen in the early Earth atmosphere, then what would protect the amino acids and the potential proteins from UV light (oxygen produces ozone)?
Some questions should be left up to the reader, so to speak. This one is definitly not "rocket science". Why don't you think it over for a few minutes and suggest a couple of reasonable answers for yourself?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 102 by Muhd, posted 04-07-2004 7:23 PM Muhd has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 113 by Muhd, posted 04-09-2004 3:51 AM NosyNed has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024