Who Owns the Standard Definition of Evolution

quote:

---

If you're getting the same reaction from several intelligent and qualified people it's likely that either you haven't explained yourself properly or that you are wrong.

---

I asked a question, what is the probability that we have a fair coin?Do you think it's difficult to understand what is being asked here? What part of this question do you think needs more explaining.If you lot manage to misunderstand it, then no, you are by far not intelligent and not qualified.

quote:

---

Another evolutionist totally missing the point and talking nonsense. It's about the miíinterpretation of the p-value by Taq. Not about what model produces what data.

---

I get it. You’re. Not actually interested in addressing Taq’s claim at all. Either that or you’re just arrogantly dismissing my point without understanding it.

That question can only be answered after the fact. But a scientist would form the hypothesis that as there are two sides to the coin and that there are no obvious sign of a bias then the prediction would be p=0.5 per toss. Then he would test the prediction by tossing it n times.With a fair coin the predicted probability of the coin landing all tails or all heads 10 in a row is 2^10, 1024.
​ Yes That would be all of it. We have no idea what point you are hoping to make. So why not spell it out for us?
​

quote:

---

I get it. You’re. Not actually interested in addressing Taq’s claim at all. Either that or you’re just arrogantly dismissing my point without understanding it.

---

No, you don't get it at all. You think you do, but you fail miserably. Your point is mute, as it does not at all address anything that is up for discussion here.

quote:

---

That question can only be answered after the fact.

---

After what fact?

quote:

---

That would be all of it.

---

Then I suggest you take english class.You are trying to guess the point. That is your problem. You guess, but you guess wrong over and over again. So just stick to the question, that is already hard enough for you low intellects.

After you've performed the test. (Of tossing the coin n times to confirm or falsify the initial p=0.5 prediction) Why are you asking us to guess your point, why don't you just tell us what your point is?Is it because you've lost the point you thought you were making? Or maybe you thought you had one but have been shown to be wrong and can't admit it? Or, more likely, never had one in the first place? Your question has been answered. We're waiting to hear from you what its relevance has to the discussion about evolution.

quote:

---

After you've performed the test. (Of tossing the coin n times to confirm or falsify the initial p=0.5 prediction)

---

Test has already been performed, as I stated. We observed ten times tails. So do you think you can answer the question now? Or explain to Taq that the probability of 1/1024 of finding this observation is not the same as the probability that the p=0.5 assumption is correct or not.

quote:

---

Your question has been answered.

---

Who answered it, and what was the answer? I have only found an incorrect answer from Taq, saying it's the same as the p-value of 1/1024.What is your answer?

The prior probability of a two-sided coin falling tails 10 times in a row is 1:1024. If we toss the coin 10 times and it comes up tails every time we conclude that the coin is very unlikely (1 chance in 1024) to be fair and that the original prediction of p=0.5 for that coin was highly unlikely to be correct.If we want more precision we keep on tossing the coin.So what is you point?

quote:

---

No, you don't get it at all. You think you do, but you fail miserably. Your point is mute, as it does not at all address anything that is up for discussion here

---

My point is that your argument does not address Taq’s actual point. Obviously you shouldn’t be able to reliably tell random data from random data. So it is your argument that is moot (not “mute” - you can’t even get that right).And that’s why you use arrogant bluster instead of actually addressing the issues I raise.

You have yet to raise any objections that are true to evolution's view that life changes over time through a process of descent with modification combined with natural selection. You seem to have begun a reset to where you started of just saying evolution is wrong while ignoring the discussion of the past couple hundred messages where you were unable to find anything that was actually wrong.--Percy

You're ignoring more than biology then. Onward Christian soldier, to physics, to chemistry, to astronomy, to cosmology, to geology, to boldly do battle with all the rebukes to your religious fantasies.More on topic, genetic analyses reveal events of biological change that took place millions of years ago.--Percy

You and K.Rose should get together in a thread and present your evidences to each other. You could build from these:

1. The Age of the Earth (version 3 no 1 part 1)
   
2. The Age of the Earth (version 3 no 1 part 2)
   
3. The Age of the Earth (version 3 no 1 part 3)

--Percy

Understandings of what were formerly considered DNA's non-functional regions have improved. Some regions *are* non-functional or have functions we do not yet understand, but others have functions. But a region doesn't have to have a known function to trace it's genetic history. The fewest possible common ancestors is 1. Zero is not possible and is shown wrong by the existence of your own parents. In the Biblical view of you and K.Rose, if God created 10 million species then there are 10 million common ancestors, not none.--Percy

That question makes sense, your question makes no sense to anyone here. If you decide to clarify to the point where people understand then we can comment. Are you asking whether I consider humans primates? Of course I do. It's definitional. It's like asking is a Ford Fairlane a car. Of course it is, by definition.--Percy

You remain mostly incomprehensible to most people here, it appears by choice. If and when you start saying comprehensible things then we can comment.--Percy