Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 46 (9216 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: KING IYK
Post Volume: Total: 920,623 Year: 945/6,935 Month: 226/719 Week: 14/204 Day: 14/46 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The Historical Jesus: Did He Create the Universe?
ICANT
Member (Idle past 345 days)
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007


Message 106 of 537 (916015)
02-21-2024 7:59 PM
Reply to: Message 86 by Taq
02-21-2024 3:16 PM


Re: By the Numbers
Hi Taq,
Taq writes:
What evidence are you going from?
Science.
AI writes:
The Big Bang theory describes the beginning of our universe as an expansion rather than a literal “bang.” While the term “bang” might evoke thoughts of a sudden explosion, the actual process was more gradual and complex.
Here’s a concise explanation:
Expansion: Around 13.8 billion years ago, the entire cosmos emerged from an incredibly dense and hot state. This tiny, fiery ball of energy rapidly expanded, leading to the formation of galaxies, stars, and everything we observe today. The expansion continues even now, with galaxies moving away from each other.
Taq writes:
I have yet to see any evidence as to where the energy came from, so I simply say I don't know. All we do know is that it was there at the beginning of the universe.
That's my problem with the BBT It has no place the energy can come from to begin expanding to start with. According to science there is nothing outside the little pea sized universe that came from nothing.
Taq writes:
If we start the clock at the beginning of our universe, there is a 13.8 billion year limit to get where we are today from that initial condition.
Your clock is running slow they have already started talking over 28 billion years old since the last discovery of billions of Galaxies existing.
And that is not as far as it goes back. Thats just what is visible now.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 86 by Taq, posted 02-21-2024 3:16 PM Taq has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 118 by Taq, posted 02-22-2024 10:57 AM ICANT has replied

  
ICANT
Member (Idle past 345 days)
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007


Message 107 of 537 (916016)
02-21-2024 8:43 PM
Reply to: Message 103 by GDR
02-21-2024 6:29 PM


Re: By the Numbers
Hi GDR,
GDR writes:
at all.
quote:
Proverbs 16:4 The LORD hath made all things for himself: yea, even the wicked for the day of evil.
From the Old Testament.
quote:
John 1:3 All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made.
From the New Testament
Explain to me what part of all things does not mean all things?
Or without Him was not any thing made that was made?
GDR writes:
Wrong again. Science is about trying to find out how this world came into existence, without regard to whether or not it is the result of an external intelligence.
I think in that context I was talking about creation.
I got no problem with science trying to figure out and tell me how God created things. I just don't like being told I am stupid, when scientist can't figure out where the energy came from that expanded into the universe.
GDR writes:
Firstly, the Word of God is Jesus, (see see John 1 as you well know). There are many like myself who also believe we are guided by the Holy Spirit that disagree with your understanding of the Scriptures.
Yes that is what John said.
But He is also the creator. The universe and everything in it for created for Him.
You were created for Him and He died for you so you could spend eternity with Him if you chose too. That goes for everybody else also.
If you want to talk about some of our differences drop me an email address is in my profile.
God Bless,​

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 103 by GDR, posted 02-21-2024 6:29 PM GDR has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 117 by GDR, posted 02-22-2024 10:41 AM ICANT has replied

  
ICANT
Member (Idle past 345 days)
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007


Message 108 of 537 (916017)
02-21-2024 8:56 PM
Reply to: Message 102 by AZPaul3
02-21-2024 6:10 PM


Re: By the Numbers
Hi AZPaul,
AZPaul writes:
I can't. This is a religion thread. We can't do science here, only majik.
If we can't deal with the truth in a religious thread where can we deal with it?
I thought the science threads was the only place we could do majik.
We have stuff evolving with no way to begin to exist but Magic.
We have a universe beginning to exist without a source of energy but magic.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 102 by AZPaul3, posted 02-21-2024 6:10 PM AZPaul3 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 113 by AZPaul3, posted 02-22-2024 12:18 AM ICANT has replied

  
Theodoric
Member
Posts: 9489
From: Northwest, WI, USA
Joined: 08-15-2005


Message 109 of 537 (916019)
02-21-2024 9:33 PM
Reply to: Message 97 by Phat
02-21-2024 5:21 PM


Re: By the Numbers
jesus who?

What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence. -Christopher Hitchens

Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts

"God did it" is not an argument. It is an excuse for intellectual laziness.

If your viewpoint has merits and facts to back it up why would you have to lie?


This message is a reply to:
 Message 97 by Phat, posted 02-21-2024 5:21 PM Phat has seen this message but not replied

  
ICANT
Member (Idle past 345 days)
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007


Message 110 of 537 (916020)
02-21-2024 9:54 PM
Reply to: Message 37 by Percy
02-18-2024 12:27 PM


Re: By the Numbers
Hi Percy,
Percy writes:
But you never answer the question: How do you know that "eternal" is the right number for the age of the universe?
I believe Einstein was correct to begin with.
Not only that but because Jesus/God created it in the beginning.
Percy writes:
And you know this how?
Science says so.
Percy writes:
What we do know is that when we project the current motion of galaxies backward in time to about 13.8 billion years ago we find that the universe occupied a very tiny region of space.
That has more than doubled now.
Percy writes:
Possibly. Some hypotheses involve quantum fluctuations where equal amounts of positive and negative energy and matter are created and where the net energy is zero.
Wouldn't they have to have a place to exist before they could bump together?
Percy writes:
The Milky Way Galaxy is not moving through space at the speed of light relative to anything.
So is the Milky Way Galaxy sitting still?
If space behind the Milky Way Galaxy is expanding at the speed of light then we have to be moving at the speed of light don't we? Or Can the space go through us.
Percy writes:
Which galaxy would that be? You can't mean the Andromeda Galaxy
Andromeda is said to be 4 to 5 billion years old. That would put it 23 billion years behind us. But it is said to collide with us in 4 billion years.
Percy writes:
The Milky Way has a host of small satellite galaxies, maybe you mean one of those?
No everything tied to the Milkey Way. If space is expanding behind us at the speed of light wouldn't we have to be moving at the speed of light?
Percy writes:
The further away galaxies are the faster they are receding from us.
Then we are sitting still and space is not expanding beihind us only in front of us?
Percy writes:
Understand that these unobservable galaxies are not moving through space faster than light relative to us. It is the expansion of space itself causing them to recede faster than light.
Let me see said the blind man. Space behind them is expanding at the speed of light. Space then is expanding at the speed of light in front of us. Space is expanding at the speed of light behind us causing them to be speeding away from us at the speed of light, Is that what you are trying to tell me?
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 37 by Percy, posted 02-18-2024 12:27 PM Percy has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 111 by Tanypteryx, posted 02-21-2024 10:07 PM ICANT has replied
 Message 115 by Percy, posted 02-22-2024 9:41 AM ICANT has replied

  
Tanypteryx
Member
Posts: 4597
From: Oregon, USA
Joined: 08-27-2006


Message 111 of 537 (916022)
02-21-2024 10:07 PM
Reply to: Message 110 by ICANT
02-21-2024 9:54 PM


Re: By the Numbers
ICANT in Message 110 writes:
Space behind them is expanding at the speed of light. Space then is expanding at the speed of light in front of us. Space is expanding at the speed of light behind us causing them to be speeding away from us at the speed of light,
I just have to ask, how do you tell which direction is in front or behind you in space? is it just whatever is behind your head?

Stop Tzar Vladimir the Condemned!
What if Eleanor Roosevelt had wings? -- Monty Python
One important characteristic of a theory is that it has survived repeated attempts to falsify it. Contrary to your understanding, all available evidence confirms it. --Subbie
If evolution is shown to be false, it will be at the hands of things that are true, not made up. --Percy
The reason that we have the scientific method is because common sense isn't reliable. -- Taq
Why should anyone debate someone who doesn't know the subject? -- AZPaul3

This message is a reply to:
 Message 110 by ICANT, posted 02-21-2024 9:54 PM ICANT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 131 by ICANT, posted 02-23-2024 9:17 AM Tanypteryx has replied

  
ICANT
Member (Idle past 345 days)
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007


(1)
Message 112 of 537 (916023)
02-21-2024 10:21 PM
Reply to: Message 43 by Percy
02-18-2024 2:33 PM


Re: Does it matter
Percy writes:
Or maybe they just thought they were talking about God.
Some of them walked with Him daily for 3.5 years.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 43 by Percy, posted 02-18-2024 2:33 PM Percy has not replied

  
AZPaul3
Member
Posts: 8710
From: Phoenix
Joined: 11-06-2006
Member Rating: 5.0


(1)
Message 113 of 537 (916024)
02-22-2024 12:18 AM
Reply to: Message 108 by ICANT
02-21-2024 8:56 PM


Re: By the Numbers
If we can't deal with the truth in a religious thread where can we deal with it?
In a stand-up comic act on Comedy Central. Religion threads are, by definition, fantasy. No truth to them.
We have stuff evolving with no way to begin to exist but Magic.
In your intellectually stunted state we can understand such perception errors.
We have a universe beginning to exist without a source of energy but magic.
The universe definitely had plenty of energy to work with, ICANT. But it wasn't your majik what brung it. It may have been the vacuum energy of space itself that rushed in to fill the void left when the inflaton field quiesced. A stark phase transition. We haven't made that solid in theory, yet, but we know whatever happened was not religious so was not from any majik.

Stop Tzar Vladimir the Condemned!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 108 by ICANT, posted 02-21-2024 8:56 PM ICANT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 122 by ICANT, posted 02-22-2024 1:13 PM AZPaul3 has not replied

  
Tangle
Member
Posts: 9627
From: UK
Joined: 10-07-2011
Member Rating: 5.3


Message 114 of 537 (916027)
02-22-2024 2:47 AM
Reply to: Message 105 by ICANT
02-21-2024 7:36 PM


Re: By the Numbers
ICANT writes:
Agreeing for the sake of argument does not prove that He existed.
Well you sure got me there pastor. Do'h!
We're having the 'did he exist argument' elsewhere so here we're saying 'for the sake of this discussion here let's all assume Jesus existed', now show us how he created the universe.

Je suis Charlie. Je suis Ahmed. Je suis Juif. Je suis Parisien. I am Mancunian. I am Brum. I am London. Olen Suomi Soy Barcelona. I am Ukraine.

"Science adjusts it's views based on what's observed.
Faith is the denial of observation so that Belief can be preserved."
- Tim Minchin, in his beat poem, Storm.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 105 by ICANT, posted 02-21-2024 7:36 PM ICANT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 116 by ICANT, posted 02-22-2024 10:01 AM Tangle has replied

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 23144
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 5.8


Message 115 of 537 (916032)
02-22-2024 9:41 AM
Reply to: Message 110 by ICANT
02-21-2024 9:54 PM


Re: By the Numbers
ICANT in Message 110 writes:
Percy writes:
But you never answer the question: How do you know that "eternal" is the right number for the age of the universe?
I believe Einstein was correct to begin with.
Until 1931 Einstein accepted a static universe with respect to changes in size and believed the universe had always been and always would be. Then he saw the Hubble data showing the universe was expanding.
Not only that but because Jesus/God created it in the beginning.
This is the proposition that you say you will prove in this thread. You can't cite your proposition as a conclusion.
Percy writes:
And you know this how?
Science says so.
Science says it doesn't know but has some hypotheses.
Percy writes:
What we do know is that when we project the current motion of galaxies backward in time to about 13.8 billion years ago we find that the universe occupied a very tiny region of space.
That has more than doubled now.
Much, much more than doubled. If it was once the size of a single proton (10-15 meters) and is now, the observable portion anyway, about 90 billion light years in diameter (8.5×1026 meters) then it has grown by a factor of roughly 1042 times.
Percy writes:
Possibly. Some hypotheses involve quantum fluctuations where equal amounts of positive and negative energy and matter are created and where the net energy is zero.
Wouldn't they have to have a place to exist before they could bump together?
You'd have to ask a cosmologist, but my layperson answer is that quantum uncertainty means that there can never be a zero amount of space.
Percy writes:
The Milky Way Galaxy is not moving through space at the speed of light relative to anything.
So is the Milky Way Galaxy sitting still?
All motion is measured relative to something else. The Milky Way is stationary with respect to itself. From within the Milky Way we see the Andromeda galaxy approaching and the more distant Pinwheel galaxy receding.
Nothing made of matter (galaxies are made of matter) is moving at the speed of light. Only photons in a vacuum can move at the speed of light.
If space behind the Milky Way Galaxy is expanding at the speed of light then we have to be moving at the speed of light don't we? Or Can the space go through us.
In what follows you use the term "behind" several times with respect to galaxies. There is no behind, in front of, above or below in space unless a point of reference is provided. The term you just used, "behind the Milky Way galaxy," has no meaning because "behind" isn't a direction in space.
Percy writes:
Which galaxy would that be? You can't mean the Andromeda Galaxy
Andromeda is said to be 4 to 5 billion years old. That would put it 23 billion years behind us. But it is said to collide with us in 4 billion years.
Except for the last sentence, this is gibberish.
Percy writes:
The Milky Way has a host of small satellite galaxies, maybe you mean one of those?
No everything tied to the Milky Way. If space is expanding behind us at the speed of light wouldn't we have to be moving at the speed of light?
Again, nothing made of matter, like galaxies, can move at the speed of light relative to any other object. And an object's speed can only be measured with respect to other objects.
We've attempted to measure the expansion of space, and the current best figure seems to be 67.5 kilometers/second/megaparsec. For example, the space out around Pluto is receding from us at a rate of about .01 millimeters/second. Further away the space out by the nearest star, Proxima Centauri, is receding from us at a rate of about 88 millimeters/second. Much further away the space out by the Andromeda galaxy is receding from us at a rate of about 52.5 kilometers/second, but is approaching us even faster, so we see the Andromeda galaxy approaching at about 100 kilometers/second. The speed of nearby objects such as stars in the Milky Way or nearby galaxies like the Magellanic Clouds or the Andromeda galaxy can easily overwhelm the rate of expansion of space.
The the rate at which space is expanding away from us increases with increasing distance, and almost all galaxies outside our local group are moving away from us due to the expansion of space.
Percy writes:
The further away galaxies are the faster they are receding from us.
Then we are sitting still and space is not expanding behind us only in front of us?
Everything is sitting still with respect to itself. These distant galaxies are stationary with respect to themselves and see the Milky Way as receding from them.
Percy writes:
Understand that these unobservable galaxies are not moving through space faster than light relative to us. It is the expansion of space itself causing them to recede faster than light.
Let me see said the blind man. Space behind them is expanding at the speed of light. Space then is expanding at the speed of light in front of us. Space is expanding at the speed of light behind us causing them to be speeding away from us at the speed of light, Is that what you are trying to tell me?
If you understood what I've said in this post then you now understand that this is gibberish.
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 110 by ICANT, posted 02-21-2024 9:54 PM ICANT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 126 by ICANT, posted 02-22-2024 3:00 PM Percy has replied

  
ICANT
Member (Idle past 345 days)
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007


Message 116 of 537 (916033)
02-22-2024 10:01 AM
Reply to: Message 114 by Tangle
02-22-2024 2:47 AM


Re: By the Numbers
Hi Charlie,
Tangle writes:
We're having the 'did he exist argument' elsewhere so here we're saying 'for the sake of this discussion here let's all assume Jesus existed', now show us how he created the universe.
I have to prove He existed first because if He did,'t exist He could not create anything.
In Message 87 I gave proof of a historical Jesus. You did not comment on it so I assume you did not read it.
I posted the same information in the other thread in msg 442, I can't get the mid code to work
I guess you didn[t see that one either.
God Bless]

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 114 by Tangle, posted 02-22-2024 2:47 AM Tangle has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 125 by Tangle, posted 02-22-2024 2:52 PM ICANT has not replied

  
GDR
Member
Posts: 6223
From: Sidney, BC, Canada
Joined: 05-22-2005


Message 117 of 537 (916035)
02-22-2024 10:41 AM
Reply to: Message 107 by ICANT
02-21-2024 8:43 PM


Focusing on the clear and simple
ICANT writes:
I got no problem with science trying to figure out and tell me how God created things. I just don't like being told I am stupid,
You are not a stupid man, but even the most brilliant mind in the world can be wrong about things that can't be proven empirically.
You didn't respond to my critique of your understanding of how to understand the Bible. However that isn't really that important. What matters is the things we would agree on.
Here is a line from our liturgy which really jumped out too me. It is simply this in referring to trinitarian belief, but it also applies to our Christian faith in general.
"So complex so simple, so clear so mysterious."
It is the simple and clear part of our faith that matters, and it can be summed up in the "Golden Rule". "Do unto others what you would have them do unto you". From Matthew 7:
quote:
12 So in everything, do to others what you would have them do to you, for this sums up the Law and the Prophets.
Another way of putting it can be seen in my signature.
That is what is clear and simple and that is what really matters. I'm sure that as a pastor you have applied that in your life and I'm sure that you have done a lot of good for a lot of people.
The complex and mysterious part is interesting, but not as important in general. However, in taking the Bible as being inerrant then we can use passages in Scripture to justify acts of unjustified violence. That has happened numerous times.
Let's just agree that God is a loving god and is responsible for the fact that we exist. More importantly, that we can have empathy and morality, and that we are called to humbly apply this in how we live our lives and be very thankful.

He has told you, O man, what is good ; And what does the LORD require of you But to do justice, to love kindness, And to walk humbly with your God.

Micah 6:8


This message is a reply to:
 Message 107 by ICANT, posted 02-21-2024 8:43 PM ICANT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 123 by ICANT, posted 02-22-2024 1:39 PM GDR has replied

  
Taq
Member
Posts: 10385
Joined: 03-06-2009
Member Rating: 5.7


Message 118 of 537 (916036)
02-22-2024 10:57 AM
Reply to: Message 106 by ICANT
02-21-2024 7:59 PM


Re: By the Numbers
ICANT writes:
Science.
What science?
That's my problem with the BBT It has no place the energy can come from to begin expanding to start with.
Then you must also have a problem with many other theories in science because they don't have a place where that energy came from. Germ theory doesn't have a place for the origin of that energy. Atom theory does not explain that origin. The theory of relativity doesn't attempt to explain it. It would seem that you reject all of science.
According to science there is nothing outside the little pea sized universe that came from nothing.
There are many different theories out there, some of which have other universes outside our own.
Your clock is running slow they have already started talking over 28 billion years old since the last discovery of billions of Galaxies existing.
What are you talking about???? Discovering more galaxies doesn't increase the age of the universe.
And that is not as far as it goes back. Thats just what is visible now.
The initial expansion of our universe is as far as it goes back for our universe.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 106 by ICANT, posted 02-21-2024 7:59 PM ICANT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 120 by ICANT, posted 02-22-2024 12:49 PM Taq has replied

  
ICANT
Member (Idle past 345 days)
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007


Message 119 of 537 (916040)
02-22-2024 12:22 PM
Reply to: Message 92 by Candle3
02-21-2024 4:59 PM


Re: By the Numbers
Hi Candle2,
If you want me to take the time to answer your posts you will have to stick with what the Bible says as I have a lot of people to answer.
C2 writes:
Evil is from the. Hebrew word "Rah. And as the case with
many Hebrew words, Rah has a wide range of meanings,
depending on the context.
The Hebrew word רע is a absolute state masculine plural intensive noun not an adjective as any other word that it has been translated as. According to the Hebrew Lexicon it means evil and out of 663 times used in the Bible was translated evil 442 times all other words it was translated as are adjectives.
Since it is a noun evil is the only definition possible in Isaiah 45:7.
C2 writes:
The translators of the KJV mistakingly rendered rah as evil
when calamity or bad times would have been much more
appropriate in 45:7.
It was translated bad 13 times Wickedness 59 times, calamity 0 times, out of a total of 663 times it appears in the Bible.
God was creating an entity He was not describing the entity. The Hebrew language is not English and don't necessary work like English.
C2 writes:
I make peace, and create evil is not Parallelism.
I make peace, and I create calamity. Or, I make good
times and bad times.
Isaiah did not know anything about English French, German or any language other than Hebrew and that is what he used to write . If you want to understand what he is saying you need to learn the language and think like he did.
He meant exactly what he said and you can't read it any other way.
C2 writes:
The NIV renders this verse as "I form the light, and create
darkness; I bring prosperity, and create disaster
Do you know what NIV stands for? Non Inspired Version
C2 writes:
I am the one who creates the light,
Well He did not create light He is light so it already existed but darkness did not exist until He created it neither did evil. The Hebrew verb ברא which means create is in front of darkness and evil in Isaiah 45:7.
C2 writes:
God directs judgements, disappointments, trials, and
calamities.
Where does He claim to do that? He allowed the devil to create calamities for Job.
But He did not direct them.
C2]Isaiah 45:7 does not prove God is the author of moral
evil, or sin. To suggest that He is goes against the
character of a just and Holy God.
Well the devil did not create either one as he has no creative powers. Jesus is the only one that created anything as He created all things.
C2 writes:
Ezekiel 28 states that Satan was perfect in all His ways
TILL iniquity was found in him.
It does not. That statement was made in the lamentation to the King of Tyre the devil is mentioned nowhere in that text. Quit reading things into the Bible you aren't supposed to add to it.
C2 writes:
Where in the Bible does it say that?
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 92 by Candle3, posted 02-21-2024 4:59 PM Candle3 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 142 by Candle3, posted 02-23-2024 1:58 PM ICANT has replied
 Message 145 by Candle3, posted 02-23-2024 2:30 PM ICANT has replied
 Message 148 by Candle3, posted 02-23-2024 5:45 PM ICANT has replied

  
ICANT
Member (Idle past 345 days)
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007


Message 120 of 537 (916041)
02-22-2024 12:49 PM
Reply to: Message 118 by Taq
02-22-2024 10:57 AM


Re: By the Numbers
Hi Taq,
Then you must also have a problem with many other theories in science because they don't have a place where that energy came from. Germ theory doesn't have a place for the origin of that energy. Atom theory does not explain that origin. The theory of relativity doesn't attempt to explain it. It would seem that you reject all of science.
Why would I need to know where any of those things energy came from. Don't they all exist in the universe?
Doesn't the universe have all the energy necessary to produce everything in it ?
So they all have an energy source.
The universe is what does not have a source for its energy.
There are many different theories out there, some of which have other universes outside our own.
Hypothesis are not theories they are only the assumptions of man or his imagination.
Taq writes:
What are you talking about???? Discovering more galaxies doesn't increase the age of the universe.
quote:
Early universe observations by the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) cannot be explained by current cosmological models. These models estimate the universe to be 13.8 billion years in age, based on the big-bang expanding universe concept.
My research proposes a model that determines the universe's age to be 26.7 billion years, which accounts for the JWST's "impossible early galaxy" observations.
Impossible early galaxies refer to the fact that some galaxies dating to the cosmic dawn—500 to 800 million years after the big bang—have disks and bulges similar to those which have passed through a long period of evolution. And smaller in size galaxies are apparently more massive than larger ones, which is quite the opposite of expectation.
https://phys.org/news/2023-08-universe-theory-believed.html
Taq writes:
The initial expansion of our universe is as far as it goes back for our universe.
I didn't know it had stopped expanding when did it do that?
I thought it was getting bigger all the time.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 118 by Taq, posted 02-22-2024 10:57 AM Taq has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 121 by Taq, posted 02-22-2024 12:58 PM ICANT has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2025