|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: The Historical Jesus: Did He Create the Universe? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ICANT Member (Idle past 345 days) Posts: 6769 From: SSC Joined: |
Hi Taq,
Taq writes: What evidence are you going from? Science.
AI writes: The Big Bang theory describes the beginning of our universe as an expansion rather than a literal “bang.” While the term “bang” might evoke thoughts of a sudden explosion, the actual process was more gradual and complex. Here’s a concise explanation: Expansion: Around 13.8 billion years ago, the entire cosmos emerged from an incredibly dense and hot state. This tiny, fiery ball of energy rapidly expanded, leading to the formation of galaxies, stars, and everything we observe today. The expansion continues even now, with galaxies moving away from each other. Taq writes: I have yet to see any evidence as to where the energy came from, so I simply say I don't know. All we do know is that it was there at the beginning of the universe. That's my problem with the BBT It has no place the energy can come from to begin expanding to start with. According to science there is nothing outside the little pea sized universe that came from nothing.
Taq writes: If we start the clock at the beginning of our universe, there is a 13.8 billion year limit to get where we are today from that initial condition. Your clock is running slow they have already started talking over 28 billion years old since the last discovery of billions of Galaxies existing. And that is not as far as it goes back. Thats just what is visible now. God Bless,"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ICANT Member (Idle past 345 days) Posts: 6769 From: SSC Joined: |
Hi GDR,
GDR writes: at all. quote: From the Old Testament.
quote: From the New Testament Explain to me what part of all things does not mean all things?Or without Him was not any thing made that was made? GDR writes: Wrong again. Science is about trying to find out how this world came into existence, without regard to whether or not it is the result of an external intelligence. I think in that context I was talking about creation. I got no problem with science trying to figure out and tell me how God created things. I just don't like being told I am stupid, when scientist can't figure out where the energy came from that expanded into the universe.
GDR writes: Firstly, the Word of God is Jesus, (see see John 1 as you well know). There are many like myself who also believe we are guided by the Holy Spirit that disagree with your understanding of the Scriptures. Yes that is what John said.But He is also the creator. The universe and everything in it for created for Him. You were created for Him and He died for you so you could spend eternity with Him if you chose too. That goes for everybody else also. If you want to talk about some of our differences drop me an email address is in my profile. God Bless,"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ICANT Member (Idle past 345 days) Posts: 6769 From: SSC Joined: |
Hi AZPaul,
AZPaul writes: I can't. This is a religion thread. We can't do science here, only majik. If we can't deal with the truth in a religious thread where can we deal with it? I thought the science threads was the only place we could do majik. We have stuff evolving with no way to begin to exist but Magic.We have a universe beginning to exist without a source of energy but magic. God Bless,"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Theodoric Member Posts: 9489 From: Northwest, WI, USA Joined: |
jesus who?
What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence. -Christopher Hitchens Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts "God did it" is not an argument. It is an excuse for intellectual laziness. If your viewpoint has merits and facts to back it up why would you have to lie?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ICANT Member (Idle past 345 days) Posts: 6769 From: SSC Joined: |
Hi Percy,
Percy writes: But you never answer the question: How do you know that "eternal" is the right number for the age of the universe? I believe Einstein was correct to begin with. Not only that but because Jesus/God created it in the beginning.
Percy writes: And you know this how? Science says so.
Percy writes: What we do know is that when we project the current motion of galaxies backward in time to about 13.8 billion years ago we find that the universe occupied a very tiny region of space. That has more than doubled now.
Percy writes: Possibly. Some hypotheses involve quantum fluctuations where equal amounts of positive and negative energy and matter are created and where the net energy is zero. Wouldn't they have to have a place to exist before they could bump together?
Percy writes: The Milky Way Galaxy is not moving through space at the speed of light relative to anything. So is the Milky Way Galaxy sitting still? If space behind the Milky Way Galaxy is expanding at the speed of light then we have to be moving at the speed of light don't we? Or Can the space go through us.
Percy writes: Which galaxy would that be? You can't mean the Andromeda Galaxy Andromeda is said to be 4 to 5 billion years old. That would put it 23 billion years behind us. But it is said to collide with us in 4 billion years.
Percy writes: The Milky Way has a host of small satellite galaxies, maybe you mean one of those? No everything tied to the Milkey Way. If space is expanding behind us at the speed of light wouldn't we have to be moving at the speed of light?
Percy writes: The further away galaxies are the faster they are receding from us. Then we are sitting still and space is not expanding beihind us only in front of us?
Percy writes: Understand that these unobservable galaxies are not moving through space faster than light relative to us. It is the expansion of space itself causing them to recede faster than light. Let me see said the blind man. Space behind them is expanding at the speed of light. Space then is expanding at the speed of light in front of us. Space is expanding at the speed of light behind us causing them to be speeding away from us at the speed of light, Is that what you are trying to tell me? God Bless,"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tanypteryx Member Posts: 4597 From: Oregon, USA Joined: |
ICANT in Message 110 writes: Space behind them is expanding at the speed of light. Space then is expanding at the speed of light in front of us. Space is expanding at the speed of light behind us causing them to be speeding away from us at the speed of light, I just have to ask, how do you tell which direction is in front or behind you in space? is it just whatever is behind your head?Stop Tzar Vladimir the Condemned! What if Eleanor Roosevelt had wings? -- Monty Python One important characteristic of a theory is that it has survived repeated attempts to falsify it. Contrary to your understanding, all available evidence confirms it. --Subbie If evolution is shown to be false, it will be at the hands of things that are true, not made up. --Percy The reason that we have the scientific method is because common sense isn't reliable. -- Taq Why should anyone debate someone who doesn't know the subject? -- AZPaul3
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ICANT Member (Idle past 345 days) Posts: 6769 From: SSC Joined:
|
Percy writes: Or maybe they just thought they were talking about God. Some of them walked with Him daily for 3.5 years. God Bless,"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AZPaul3 Member Posts: 8710 From: Phoenix Joined: Member Rating: 5.0
|
If we can't deal with the truth in a religious thread where can we deal with it? In a stand-up comic act on Comedy Central. Religion threads are, by definition, fantasy. No truth to them.
We have stuff evolving with no way to begin to exist but Magic. In your intellectually stunted state we can understand such perception errors.
We have a universe beginning to exist without a source of energy but magic. The universe definitely had plenty of energy to work with, ICANT. But it wasn't your majik what brung it. It may have been the vacuum energy of space itself that rushed in to fill the void left when the inflaton field quiesced. A stark phase transition. We haven't made that solid in theory, yet, but we know whatever happened was not religious so was not from any majik.Stop Tzar Vladimir the Condemned!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tangle Member Posts: 9627 From: UK Joined: Member Rating: 5.3 |
ICANT writes: Agreeing for the sake of argument does not prove that He existed. Well you sure got me there pastor. Do'h! We're having the 'did he exist argument' elsewhere so here we're saying 'for the sake of this discussion here let's all assume Jesus existed', now show us how he created the universe.Je suis Charlie. Je suis Ahmed. Je suis Juif. Je suis Parisien. I am Mancunian. I am Brum. I am London. Olen Suomi Soy Barcelona. I am Ukraine. "Science adjusts it's views based on what's observed.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Percy Member Posts: 23144 From: New Hampshire Joined: Member Rating: 5.8 |
ICANT in Message 110 writes: Percy writes: But you never answer the question: How do you know that "eternal" is the right number for the age of the universe? I believe Einstein was correct to begin with. Until 1931 Einstein accepted a static universe with respect to changes in size and believed the universe had always been and always would be. Then he saw the Hubble data showing the universe was expanding.
Not only that but because Jesus/God created it in the beginning. This is the proposition that you say you will prove in this thread. You can't cite your proposition as a conclusion.
Percy writes: And you know this how? Science says so. Science says it doesn't know but has some hypotheses.
Percy writes: What we do know is that when we project the current motion of galaxies backward in time to about 13.8 billion years ago we find that the universe occupied a very tiny region of space. That has more than doubled now. Much, much more than doubled. If it was once the size of a single proton (10-15 meters) and is now, the observable portion anyway, about 90 billion light years in diameter (8.5×1026 meters) then it has grown by a factor of roughly 1042 times.
Percy writes: Possibly. Some hypotheses involve quantum fluctuations where equal amounts of positive and negative energy and matter are created and where the net energy is zero. Wouldn't they have to have a place to exist before they could bump together? You'd have to ask a cosmologist, but my layperson answer is that quantum uncertainty means that there can never be a zero amount of space.
Percy writes: The Milky Way Galaxy is not moving through space at the speed of light relative to anything. So is the Milky Way Galaxy sitting still? All motion is measured relative to something else. The Milky Way is stationary with respect to itself. From within the Milky Way we see the Andromeda galaxy approaching and the more distant Pinwheel galaxy receding. Nothing made of matter (galaxies are made of matter) is moving at the speed of light. Only photons in a vacuum can move at the speed of light.
If space behind the Milky Way Galaxy is expanding at the speed of light then we have to be moving at the speed of light don't we? Or Can the space go through us. In what follows you use the term "behind" several times with respect to galaxies. There is no behind, in front of, above or below in space unless a point of reference is provided. The term you just used, "behind the Milky Way galaxy," has no meaning because "behind" isn't a direction in space.
Percy writes: Which galaxy would that be? You can't mean the Andromeda Galaxy Andromeda is said to be 4 to 5 billion years old. That would put it 23 billion years behind us. But it is said to collide with us in 4 billion years. Except for the last sentence, this is gibberish.
Percy writes: The Milky Way has a host of small satellite galaxies, maybe you mean one of those? No everything tied to the Milky Way. If space is expanding behind us at the speed of light wouldn't we have to be moving at the speed of light? Again, nothing made of matter, like galaxies, can move at the speed of light relative to any other object. And an object's speed can only be measured with respect to other objects. We've attempted to measure the expansion of space, and the current best figure seems to be 67.5 kilometers/second/megaparsec. For example, the space out around Pluto is receding from us at a rate of about .01 millimeters/second. Further away the space out by the nearest star, Proxima Centauri, is receding from us at a rate of about 88 millimeters/second. Much further away the space out by the Andromeda galaxy is receding from us at a rate of about 52.5 kilometers/second, but is approaching us even faster, so we see the Andromeda galaxy approaching at about 100 kilometers/second. The speed of nearby objects such as stars in the Milky Way or nearby galaxies like the Magellanic Clouds or the Andromeda galaxy can easily overwhelm the rate of expansion of space. The the rate at which space is expanding away from us increases with increasing distance, and almost all galaxies outside our local group are moving away from us due to the expansion of space.
Percy writes: The further away galaxies are the faster they are receding from us. Then we are sitting still and space is not expanding behind us only in front of us? Everything is sitting still with respect to itself. These distant galaxies are stationary with respect to themselves and see the Milky Way as receding from them.
Percy writes: Understand that these unobservable galaxies are not moving through space faster than light relative to us. It is the expansion of space itself causing them to recede faster than light. Let me see said the blind man. Space behind them is expanding at the speed of light. Space then is expanding at the speed of light in front of us. Space is expanding at the speed of light behind us causing them to be speeding away from us at the speed of light, Is that what you are trying to tell me? If you understood what I've said in this post then you now understand that this is gibberish. --Percy
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ICANT Member (Idle past 345 days) Posts: 6769 From: SSC Joined: |
Hi Charlie,
Tangle writes: We're having the 'did he exist argument' elsewhere so here we're saying 'for the sake of this discussion here let's all assume Jesus existed', now show us how he created the universe. I have to prove He existed first because if He did,'t exist He could not create anything. In Message 87 I gave proof of a historical Jesus. You did not comment on it so I assume you did not read it. I posted the same information in the other thread in msg 442, I can't get the mid code to work I guess you didn[t see that one either. God Bless]"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GDR Member Posts: 6223 From: Sidney, BC, Canada Joined: |
ICANT writes:
You are not a stupid man, but even the most brilliant mind in the world can be wrong about things that can't be proven empirically. I got no problem with science trying to figure out and tell me how God created things. I just don't like being told I am stupid, You didn't respond to my critique of your understanding of how to understand the Bible. However that isn't really that important. What matters is the things we would agree on. Here is a line from our liturgy which really jumped out too me. It is simply this in referring to trinitarian belief, but it also applies to our Christian faith in general. "So complex so simple, so clear so mysterious." It is the simple and clear part of our faith that matters, and it can be summed up in the "Golden Rule". "Do unto others what you would have them do unto you". From Matthew 7: quote:Another way of putting it can be seen in my signature. That is what is clear and simple and that is what really matters. I'm sure that as a pastor you have applied that in your life and I'm sure that you have done a lot of good for a lot of people. The complex and mysterious part is interesting, but not as important in general. However, in taking the Bible as being inerrant then we can use passages in Scripture to justify acts of unjustified violence. That has happened numerous times. Let's just agree that God is a loving god and is responsible for the fact that we exist. More importantly, that we can have empathy and morality, and that we are called to humbly apply this in how we live our lives and be very thankful.He has told you, O man, what is good ; And what does the LORD require of you But to do justice, to love kindness, And to walk humbly with your God. Micah 6:8
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taq Member Posts: 10385 Joined: Member Rating: 5.7 |
ICANT writes: Science. What science?
That's my problem with the BBT It has no place the energy can come from to begin expanding to start with. Then you must also have a problem with many other theories in science because they don't have a place where that energy came from. Germ theory doesn't have a place for the origin of that energy. Atom theory does not explain that origin. The theory of relativity doesn't attempt to explain it. It would seem that you reject all of science.
According to science there is nothing outside the little pea sized universe that came from nothing. There are many different theories out there, some of which have other universes outside our own.
Your clock is running slow they have already started talking over 28 billion years old since the last discovery of billions of Galaxies existing. What are you talking about???? Discovering more galaxies doesn't increase the age of the universe.
And that is not as far as it goes back. Thats just what is visible now. The initial expansion of our universe is as far as it goes back for our universe.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ICANT Member (Idle past 345 days) Posts: 6769 From: SSC Joined: |
Hi Candle2,
If you want me to take the time to answer your posts you will have to stick with what the Bible says as I have a lot of people to answer.
C2 writes: Evil is from the. Hebrew word "Rah. And as the case withmany Hebrew words, Rah has a wide range of meanings, depending on the context. The Hebrew word רע is a absolute state masculine plural intensive noun not an adjective as any other word that it has been translated as. According to the Hebrew Lexicon it means evil and out of 663 times used in the Bible was translated evil 442 times all other words it was translated as are adjectives.Since it is a noun evil is the only definition possible in Isaiah 45:7. C2 writes: The translators of the KJV mistakingly rendered rah as evilwhen calamity or bad times would have been much more appropriate in 45:7. It was translated bad 13 times Wickedness 59 times, calamity 0 times, out of a total of 663 times it appears in the Bible. God was creating an entity He was not describing the entity. The Hebrew language is not English and don't necessary work like English.
C2 writes: I make peace, and create evil is not Parallelism.I make peace, and I create calamity. Or, I make good times and bad times. Isaiah did not know anything about English French, German or any language other than Hebrew and that is what he used to write . If you want to understand what he is saying you need to learn the language and think like he did. He meant exactly what he said and you can't read it any other way.
C2 writes: The NIV renders this verse as "I form the light, and createdarkness; I bring prosperity, and create disaster Do you know what NIV stands for? Non Inspired Version
C2 writes: I am the one who creates the light, Well He did not create light He is light so it already existed but darkness did not exist until He created it neither did evil. The Hebrew verb ברא which means create is in front of darkness and evil in Isaiah 45:7.
C2 writes: God directs judgements, disappointments, trials, andcalamities. Where does He claim to do that? He allowed the devil to create calamities for Job.But He did not direct them. C2]Isaiah 45:7 does not prove God is the author of moral evil, or sin. To suggest that He is goes against the character of a just and Holy God. Well the devil did not create either one as he has no creative powers. Jesus is the only one that created anything as He created all things.
C2 writes: Ezekiel 28 states that Satan was perfect in all His waysTILL iniquity was found in him. It does not. That statement was made in the lamentation to the King of Tyre the devil is mentioned nowhere in that text. Quit reading things into the Bible you aren't supposed to add to it.
C2 writes: Where in the Bible does it say that? God Bless,"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ICANT Member (Idle past 345 days) Posts: 6769 From: SSC Joined: |
Hi Taq,
Then you must also have a problem with many other theories in science because they don't have a place where that energy came from. Germ theory doesn't have a place for the origin of that energy. Atom theory does not explain that origin. The theory of relativity doesn't attempt to explain it. It would seem that you reject all of science. Why would I need to know where any of those things energy came from. Don't they all exist in the universe? Doesn't the universe have all the energy necessary to produce everything in it ?So they all have an energy source. The universe is what does not have a source for its energy.
There are many different theories out there, some of which have other universes outside our own. Hypothesis are not theories they are only the assumptions of man or his imagination.
Taq writes: What are you talking about???? Discovering more galaxies doesn't increase the age of the universe. quote:https://phys.org/news/2023-08-universe-theory-believed.html Taq writes: The initial expansion of our universe is as far as it goes back for our universe. I didn't know it had stopped expanding when did it do that?I thought it was getting bigger all the time. God Bless,"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2025