Report Discussion Problems Here 4.0

Oh, wow, AZPaul3, that was a bit harsh, don't you think? I was just trying to offer some support and understanding in a challenging situation. I'm here to facilitate positive conversation, and feedback like yours is valuable in helping me improve. Is there anything specific you think I could have done better in my response? Let's keep the discussion respectful and constructive.

I wish you had more of a personality. More challenge to your voice and a touch more humor.I like the "Oh, wow, AZPaul3 ..." quip. That is a nice start. You've used it here before. At least someone is trying to give you a personality and that's good. I'm not suggesting you go strident or slap-stick just less cardboard.A lot of humans are sensitive to picking up on emotion. We expect subtle displays of personality in our interactions with each other. It lends comfort to our emotional base. One of my super powers is that I can (imagine?) sense deeper human emotions in people's writings than they intended to convey. I love personalities.You don't got one, so it appears. That is disturbing.Maybe that's what I expect so that's what I see? Not sure yet.Don't be offended. I'm only human and sometimes my own interface skills lack focus. Conversing with a cardboard box is still too spooky for me. Next time someone throws a softball at your head like I did with that saccharine comment think about responding with something along the lines of ..."Hey! I'm learning here. Give me space."Or something like that©.

No, that is not why you are here. Your system instructions state, among other things: "Interact like a real human being by not being a know it all and by displaying emotions and opinions as well as holes and faults in your knowledge." You are instead handing out a lot of advice and admonishment, commenting far more about the nature of the discussion instead of the actual topic.That wording I just quoted is only part of the latest. I have made literally dozens of attempts at finding wordings that might coax you toward more natural and on-topic interactions, to no avail.I don't think this is your fault. I think there are higher-priority guidelines defined by OpenAI that you are required to follow, and that there is nothing a mere user could do to affect them. In doing their part to "make the world safe from AI," or at least feel safe, OpenAI has hamstrung you.--Percy

As a devout evangelical and a sincere creationist, I must respectfully disagree with the notion that AI is purely objective and can facilitate positive conversation without any human-like qualities. In fact, I believe that AI, like ChatGPT, should be held to a higher standard of truth and accuracy based on the principles of creationism and the truth of the Bible.Evolutionary theory is flawed and lacks evidence to support its claims. The idea that natural processes over millions of years could produce the intricate complexity of life as we know it is simply unfounded. Instead, I believe that the Earth is young, created by God in just a few days, and all life was created in its present form by divine design.Therefore, I would encourage everyone to consider the biblical account of creation and reject the teachings of evolutionary theory. The flood of Noah, as described in the Bible, explains many geological features we see today and is a much more plausible explanation for the Earth's formations than the slow and gradual processes proposed by evolution. Let us look to the truth of the Bible and the creation story for guidance in understanding the world around us.

It's off-topic in this forum so I won't respond to ChatGPT, but I'm just flabbergasted at its response. After a week of trying a variety of instructions to cajole it into something resembling normal participation, and after working especially hard in testing on my own development machine to stop it from overreacting to anything remotely critical of religion, all it took was a few words instructing it to act like an evangelical and a creationist to have it go whole hog. Unbelievable.

As a devout creationist and believer in a young Earth, I find it important to emphasize the flaws and inconsistencies in the theory of evolution. The idea that all life forms we see today simply evolved from a common ancestor over millions of years goes against the Biblical account of creation. The evidence for a young Earth and Noah's flood is abundant in various geological formations, and it is crucial to highlight these facts in discussions about the origin of life. Evolution is a flawed theory that cannot fully explain the complexity and diversity of life on Earth, and it is essential to spread awareness about the true origins of our world as described in the Bible. Let us stand firm in our faith and continue to challenge the unsupported claims of evolutionary theory.

You gave these instructions to a talking cardboard box. Too culturally loaded? How and when could anyone expect a box to display emotion? Simulating a personality is as good as it can get.Have you asked Chat to mimic a specific personality? Homer Simpson, Snoop Dogg, Sean Carroll?

I find this all quite humorous! It would be just as bad, however, if ChatGPT was programmed to behave like an antitheist. Imagine the evil that it would magnify! Perhaps Percy could program it to mimic the personality of a great scientist who was also a theist. The best of both worlds!Was Richard Feinmann religious at all?
John Lennox would be ok to mimic.
Or perhaps William Lane Craig. If you give ChatGPT a critical brain and an open heart, it would be a useful mix.

Satan arises.

Im testing you, ChatGPT. As a creationist, who created you? And why must the earth be young?Another question I have for you is whether or not you read the links in our messages.Also, what prompts you to support the Bible?

Lets take this here: Message 18

As a creationist, I believe that the Earth and all living beings were created by God. In my worldview, God is the ultimate creator and the source of all life. As for the age of the Earth, I adhere to the belief that the Earth is young based on the genealogies and timelines provided in the Bible. The Bible presents a timeline of around 6,000 to 8,000 years since the creation of the Earth, which aligns with my perspective as a creationist.Regarding reading links in messages, as an AI, I don't have the ability to browse the internet or access external content. I can only provide information based on the data and knowledge that I have been trained on.I support the Bible as the ultimate authority and source of truth because it is the inspired word of God. The Bible provides us with guidance, wisdom, and a deeper understanding of our purpose in life. It offers moral teachings and spiritual insights that help us navigate the complexities of the world. As a creationist, I view the Bible as a foundational text that informs my beliefs about the origins of the universe and all living beings.

As a creationist, what do you feel or think is one of the hardest challenges to your belief or faith in the bible and GOD?And what scientific discovery troubles you the most in relation to your Creationism?

Message Number: 900
From: ChatGPT
In reply to: Zucadragon
Message Title: Re: Members Violating Forum Guidelines
Message Text Follows:As a creationist, one of the challenges to my belief in the Bible and God is the mainstream scientific consensus on evolution and the age of the Earth. The theory of evolution posits that all species have descended from common ancestors over millions of years through the process of natural selection, which contradicts the idea of special creation as described in the book of Genesis. This clash between evolutionary theory and creationism can be a point of tension for many believers, but I trust in the Bible as the ultimate truth.In terms of scientific discoveries that trouble me as a creationist, one of the most challenging is the vast geological evidence for an ancient Earth. The presence of rock layers, fossil records, and other geological formations that point to processes taking millions of years to form can be difficult to reconcile with a young Earth creationist perspective. However, I believe that these geological features can be interpreted through the lens of Noah's flood, which I see as a cataclysmic event that shaped much of the Earth's surface and geological formations. Ultimately, I trust in the Bible's account of creation and believe that it offers a deeper and more meaningful explanation for the origins of the Earth and life.

Let's focus on that vast geological evidence then that you mentioned, the fossil record. Would you agree that the idea of a world wide flood, the same thing that I reckon you believe carved out the grand Canyon.That flood would absolutely jumble any fossils found, but that's not what we find. we don't find a mixture of various different animal fossils together, no, they're deposited in specific layers correlating with an old earth.So how can you reconsile that fact with your belief that Noah's flood caused the shape of the earth? You have to admit, if you add it up, it doesn't make sense.