|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 49 (9214 total) |
| |
Cifa.ac | |
Total: 920,161 Year: 483/6,935 Month: 483/275 Week: 200/159 Day: 18/22 Hour: 0/0 |
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Why is Biden still the President | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PaulK Member Posts: 17993 Joined: Member Rating: 5.6
|
Are you sure you’re not Marc? You’re sounding a lot like him.
There doesn’t seem to be anything wrong with Biden’s leadership. He wasn’t campaigning well, but that seems to be about it. If he’s suffering from dementia - and I’d need rather more than your say-so for that - it’s early stages. I don’t see anyone else doing much better.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PaulK Member Posts: 17993 Joined: Member Rating: 5.6
|
quote: If he’s handling them acceptably well then he is fit to be President. That should be obvious. It’s not like Trump and Covid.
quote: First, if Biden was a candidate he’d still be President as well. Even if he couldn’t handle the combined workload that doesn’t mean that he can’t handle the workload of the Presidency without the campaigning as well. Second we don’t know that he actually was that unfit. He performed poorly in the debate and the media were pushing the line that he was unfit - those could be enough even if he was up to the job.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PaulK Member Posts: 17993 Joined: Member Rating: 5.6
|
quote: No. Disagreeing with an obviously dubious point is not the same as “not getting it”.
quote: No. It’s not at all obvious that they were thinking anything beyond who has the best chance of winning the election - and Harris seems to be a more popular candidate. Even if they felt that Biden couldn’t manage another four years that doesn’t mean he’s unfit to see out his term - especially without the extra stress and work of campaigning.
quote: No, it doesn’t follow. Aside from the fact that she does have the workload and stress of the campaign - and the fact that you can’t find anything wrong with Biden’s performance - it might well be better to ease her into the role rather than just pushing her straight into it.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PaulK Member Posts: 17993 Joined: Member Rating: 5.6
|
It’s hardly unusual for GDR to indulge in questionable - or even downright silly (or dishonest) rationalisations. But it does make me wonder about the real reason he wants Biden to go.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PaulK Member Posts: 17993 Joined: Member Rating: 5.6 |
If you want debate maybe you should try doing your part.
You say that the Democratic establishment believe that Biden isn’t fit to govern but you have yet to adequately support it - or deal with the fact that Biden does seem to be governing well enough. I should point out that you aren’t treated the way you are because of differing opinions. Your arrogance and lack of concern for the truth have a lot more to do with it. And of course you’re rationalising as usual. To pick on the least temperate response and label it typical - while failing to address reasonable counterpoints - hardly suggests that you are being honest about your reason for departing.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PaulK Member Posts: 17993 Joined: Member Rating: 5.6 |
quote: All through this thread. The first post angrily asked why the Democratic establishment were not acting on the beliefs you assigned them without considering the very reasonable possibility that they did not hold those beliefs. A possibility you continued to reject even when reasonable alternatives were offered - and which you completely ignored, and now you are calling justified criticism “name calling”
quote: First, you made an angry attack on the Democratic establishment, based on a premise that is at best questionable. An attack you repeated in your second post to the thread. Second, I’d like to know which of my replies in this thread made assumptions that you find questionable - or are contradicted by the fact that Harris would be the successor. I think you will find that there are none.
quote: Even the “left-leaning” media seems to display some bias in favour of Trump these days. But as Percy points out it does not at all ask the same question. This is the question you asked:
What I want to know is why the Democratic party came to the conclusion that President Biden was cognitively impaired and should step down as the candidate but, leave him still in office.
Message 1 Can you find anywhere asking THAT question?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PaulK Member Posts: 17993 Joined: Member Rating: 5.6
|
quote: Once again you ignore the obvious fact that Biden’s campaign was going very poorly and in ways that seemed hard to fix - such as the attacks from the media. That in itself is sufficient explanation.
quote: It really doesn’t. It does more to show that Biden’s campaign was in serious trouble.
quote: If find it very hard that you are unsure what I am getting it. You claimed that I “made assumptions” and implied that those assumptions were somehow contradicted by the fact that if Biden went Harris would be President. I quoted that in my post so you have no excuse for not knowing. Here it is again:
I asked a question and then you make assumptions. If Biden stepped down then Harris would be president.
I think that this obvious evasion is exactly what it looks like - another attempt to cover up the fact that you made a false claim.
quote: Aside from attributing your words to me I note that this is another evasion. I asked you to show that other people were asking the same question you asked - the one quoted. Apparently you can’t find any. Maybe you should have the honesty to admit that. Maybe you should act like someone who believes his .sig instead of spitting on it.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PaulK Member Posts: 17993 Joined: Member Rating: 5.6 |
quote: Nevertheless you have claimed that the Democratic Percy establishment views Biden as unfit to be President - as a matter of fact - not mere opinion.
quote: Has it happened often in this thread? Real examples please.
quote: Well that’s not true, is it? Message 31
All through this thread. The first post angrily asked why the Democratic establishment were not acting on the beliefs you assigned them without considering the very reasonable possibility that they did not hold those beliefs. A possibility you continued to reject even when reasonable alternatives were offered - and which you completely ignored, and now you are calling justified criticism “name calling”
quote: The best I can say is that - if you really tried to be non-partisan - you were defeated in that objective by your own arrogance. Your post came across as a nasty smear on the Democratic Party. Because it is.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PaulK Member Posts: 17993 Joined: Member Rating: 5.6
|
quote: Speculation - especially speculation on matters you considered irrelevant to your original point - hardly establishes your opinion as fact, nor justifies presenting it as fact.
quote: No that is not true. You claimed that I “made assumptions” and implied that the fact that Harris would normally succeed Biden some contradicted that. So what are these assumptions I supposedly made ? And where did you find them in my posts ?
quote: The problem is obviously that rather than admit that something you said was untrue you’ll try to pretend that you didn’t say it - and you expect me to believe that. Here’s a simple question did you write
I asked a question and then you make assumptions
Or not? If you admit that you did - despite the denial above then will you finally explain what these assumptions were and where you found them in my posts? Or will you go on insisting that you can’t understand that? I’ll also note that it’s hardly the only example of you having a problem admitting that you are wrong in this thread. Nor is it unusual behaviour for you.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PaulK Member Posts: 17993 Joined: Member Rating: 5.6
|
quote: Review the thread - there’s no shortage of examples there. And obviously you’ll have no problem admitting to them, will you?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PaulK Member Posts: 17993 Joined: Member Rating: 5.6 |
I hope he realised just what he’s been doing - at least in part. At least we were spared the usual pretence that debate here is just personal attacks. But we didn’t get any sort of apology either.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PaulK Member Posts: 17993 Joined: Member Rating: 5.6 |
quote: That’s not what you should be apologising for.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PaulK Member Posts: 17993 Joined: Member Rating: 5.6 |
quote: Note that it agrees with what I was saying:
Biden’s call appeared to hinge entirely on political factors, rather than concerns about his health or his ability to do his job.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2025