Thank you for your post.
Calling me wrong in the topic of Physics without knowing what is Stenon Mechanics or without knowing what is the current default explanation (CDE) is totally nonsense.
Before I share Stenon Mechanics, I would like first to share your/CDE parameters and explanations. I think, many of you are un-educated or has a very low analytical mind. That is not my fault.
Below are your explanations or your positions (correct me if I am wrong here).
YOUR Position 1: Space is composed (or made of) of nothing, no stuff, no object, no matter. Space is a vacuum of nothing. Some scientists had claimed that space is a field, but they did not provide on what kind of field. Rice-field? Hair-field? Air-field? Etc.? Some scientists had also claimed that space is an electrodynamic field, but there is no composition, no matter, no physical things. Some scientists claimed quantum foam. oh my...the level of stupidity... Space is not Physics, but Mathematics.
YOUR Position 2: Gravity is a pulling force. Some of you probably claimed that all objects in space have a pulling force to grab another object – the gravitational pull. Some scientists claimed that gravity is an interaction of matters. What kind of interaction? Unexplained. Some scientists had claimed that gravity is a curvature of spacetime, and this curvature was calculated since they claimed that space has a geometry – the space geometry. Gravity too is composed of math and equations, and no stuff, no physical things.
YOUR Position 3: In the Eddington’s 1919 experiment, light bends in space. So, if “space = nothing, no stuff”, then, the conclusion is that light bends in “no stuff”. That a “no stuff = space” can bend light, when light travels in space. Some scientists claimed that light bends because of space geometry, that equations and math had curved “space = no stuff, no physical matters”. Mathematics had curved light in space.
Now, in Stenon Mechanics
STENON Position 1: Space is simply composed of inactive photon. Why photon? Because light bends in space, since the only one who can bend yourself is you, at the minimum, then, if “light = photon”, and space bends light or light travels to space, then, the medium is the same. Like an ocean and its current. Thus, the irresistible correct conclusion is that the universe is a fluid like. Thus, Stenon Mechanics falsifies, rebuts and replaces the CDE’s Position 1 (your position).
STENON Position 2: Gravity is simply a pressurized or squeezed space, max at the surface of the object (like Earth) and minimum to its outer space (the hill sphere). In Stenon, the analogy is a balloon inside a pressurized swimming pool. When a balloon is put inside that volume of water, in the surface of that balloon, there is a squeezed displaced distributed water (or space), max at the surface, and minimum at the outer. Gravity is a push. This analogy shows that the universe is really a fluid like universe. Stenon Mechanics falsifies Position 2 of CDE and yours.
When you pricked that baloon and it burst, then, it is called a Black Hole.
STENON Position 3. In Eddington’s 1919 experiment, assuming that the Sun is the balloon on that time, then, light rays is like a fishing nylon cord, when you put that fishing nylon cord on a curve-surfaced-balloon, the nylon cord will surely become curve/bend, and it is exactly bending. Thus, the universe is a fluid like universe.
Now, I cannot reveal here more info, for example, of the energy density (J/m^3) or tension force (in Newtons) etc. since I am not allowed to share my science book here.
But, the universe acts just like Stenon mechanics had discovered. That is a fact. Stenon Mechanics had explained GR and SR an science in very beautiful way, with natural mechanisms.
You can close this thread if you want, since I cannot provide more info beyond what I had shared since I am not permitted to use my science book in here since it is prohibited.
Now, some of you don't have really NO CLUE on using AIs.
You and AIs should be locked together with a criteria, that you will never cross.
In my experience, before I ask AIs in a serious discussion in science, of any topic, I set both me and AI (ChatGpt, Gemini etc) these: I asked AIs to define "contradiction" and "illogical" I demanded AIs to "strictly" follow those definitions. I called them "stupid" or "moron" to show that I am serious. If AI made a wrong reply.
Now, in PHYSICS. AIs knew that our current default explanation (CDE) or current default parameters (CDP) have many mistakes. For example, Hubble Tension, Lambda CMD, what is dark matter, QR and QM cannot be joined, etc..
In Stenon Mechanics, all of those mysteries are solved, even the recalculation of defection of light, mercury's perihelion, etc.. are solved. So, if you use AIs to check both Stenon and CDE or CDP, use these parameters of Stenon Mechanics: - the universe is like a fluid - light is space in motion - space is light at rest - space = inactive photon of light - gravity is a pressurized space, maximum at the bottom (of the Sun) and minimum at the space - the only one who can bend yourself is you, at the minimum - stenos, the root word of Stenon, in Greek (not complete, of course. In my book, ALL parameters are complete)
TAKE NOTE: All AIs have the parameters of CDE or CDP, so the battle in science and its new model will be: parameters vs parameters. BUT AIs or a logical scientists will surely ask, what is the tension force or the energy density? (This is a killer question in Physics that no one had ever answered, not even Einstein or all scientists that thought of a fluid-like universe. Only me did it. That is why I called myself as the “The Next, Better Than Einstein.)
Now, use AIs to rediscover them, if you don't want to read my science book.
Edited by MrIntelligentDesign, .
™ Version 4.2
(1)
