I think such a list would show two things:
We'll see.
1. That the Bible shows itself to be true in the long term as new evidence becomes available.
But it doesn't show that at all. By constructing a thread that admits only those challenges which can be answered, no matter how few, you do nothing but demonstrate a cowardly refusal to engage those issues which you so openly seek to avoid. Since this cowardness cannot be attributed to the bible, an exclusive list says nothing about scripture whatsoever.
2. That many times the critics of the Bible do not have the requisite knowledge to critique the Bible since it often is a multidisciplinary endeavor that requires specialized knowledge.
But who would argue such a claim. Unfortunately, that some critics do not have requisite knowledge is no more an indictment of the remaining critics than is cowardly avoidance an indictment of all Christians.
I do acknowledge that such a post demonstrates a good deal about your methodology, but I rather doubt that you should find that to your advantage.
[This message has been edited by ConsequentAtheist, 03-01-2004]
™ Version 4.2