Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,872 Year: 4,129/9,624 Month: 1,000/974 Week: 327/286 Day: 48/40 Hour: 2/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Why is bible literalism so important to YEC?
Joe Meert
Member (Idle past 5708 days)
Posts: 913
From: Gainesville
Joined: 03-02-2002


(1)
Message 11 of 20 (9734)
05-16-2002 12:33 AM
Reply to: Message 10 by Percy
05-16-2002 12:17 AM


quote:
Originally posted by Percipient:
Please, let's not turn every thread into a geological discussion.
--Percy

Why Not?
Cheers
Joe Meert

This message is a reply to:
 Message 10 by Percy, posted 05-16-2002 12:17 AM Percy has not replied

  
Joe Meert
Member (Idle past 5708 days)
Posts: 913
From: Gainesville
Joined: 03-02-2002


Message 13 of 20 (9742)
05-16-2002 1:00 AM
Reply to: Message 12 by Philip
05-16-2002 12:49 AM


However, the notion of biblical literalism is absurd. The bible is interpreted differently by creationists and yet they completely miss this fact. There is no single, correct version of the bible. I am reminded of Kent Hovind holding forth the KJV as the one true bible (decided by consensus of men). How odd?
Cheers
Joe Meert

This message is a reply to:
 Message 12 by Philip, posted 05-16-2002 12:49 AM Philip has not replied

  
Joe Meert
Member (Idle past 5708 days)
Posts: 913
From: Gainesville
Joined: 03-02-2002


Message 15 of 20 (9745)
05-16-2002 1:19 AM
Reply to: Message 14 by Tranquility Base
05-16-2002 1:15 AM


quote:
Originally posted by Tranquility Base:
^I don't think we're going to drop the Bible becasue of a few undotted is and uncrossed ts Joe. There are very few issues in which I find Biblical ambiguities to cause insurmountable problems.

JM: Of course you don't! Yet you are willing to interpret verses willy-nilly to fit your views. The bible is not, never was, nor should it be a guidebook or textbook of science. Yet, this is exactly what you and other ye-creationists have decided it should be. You should learn from your conservative christian forefathers who realized the bible was about salvation and not science.
Cheers
Joe Meert
Cheers
Joe Meert

This message is a reply to:
 Message 14 by Tranquility Base, posted 05-16-2002 1:15 AM Tranquility Base has not replied

  
Joe Meert
Member (Idle past 5708 days)
Posts: 913
From: Gainesville
Joined: 03-02-2002


Message 17 of 20 (9760)
05-16-2002 2:22 AM
Reply to: Message 16 by Tranquility Base
05-16-2002 2:16 AM


quote:
Originally posted by Tranquility Base:
But I don't Joe. I know of no point of Christian doctrine or creation/flood issue which hinges crucially on a single ambiguous verse of scripture. Yes we may propose what some things might be indicating but in that case it is a minor point.

JM: There is no such thing as an unambiguous verse of scripture! Preachers would have long run out of sermons were that the case!
Cheers
Joe Meert

This message is a reply to:
 Message 16 by Tranquility Base, posted 05-16-2002 2:16 AM Tranquility Base has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024