Apostle, thanks for bumping this post topic, it is always interesting to see a diversity of view.
I would like to say that I agree that some mention disputing the claim of {Dawkins
et al} for evidence for atheism (anti-theism?) is appropriate. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.
enjoy.
we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
Rebel
AAmerican
.Zen
[Deist
{{{Buddha walks off laughing with joy}}}