Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,452 Year: 3,709/9,624 Month: 580/974 Week: 193/276 Day: 33/34 Hour: 13/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   How bad is your googling habit and what does it mean?
Fosdick 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5522 days)
Posts: 1793
From: Upper Slobovia
Joined: 12-11-2006


Message 1 of 120 (431648)
11-01-2007 12:50 PM


How bad is your googling habit? Mine's up to about 50 googles a day, on average. Google is something like the Wizard of Oz: Oh, Great Google, what is the current human population of the world? Or, oh, great Google, what do you know about figerglass blisters? Or, oh, great Google, what did Bob Dylan mean by "blowin' in the wind"? Or, Oh, great Google, has anyone ever wondered if tsetse-fly genes jump into their victims? Great Google will always come through with answers, no matter how far-fetched or stupid my question might be. And even if I can't spell, Google will help me out. Google is patient and kind. Google is Lord.
If I cared to take the trouble I might be able to make an argument, using Google, of course, that Google is something of quantum-mechanical monster. Google could even be the new threat to our free will and self-determination. Too early to tell. But I can tell you one thing: If Google had been around when I was in school or during my profession career, life would have been very different for me and everyone else. It's hard for us to see it, but the powers of information-gathering in human affairs are growing very fast. Maybe we are becomming Homo sapiens googleease.
So my coffee-house questions are these: Could you live without Google (or any of its peers)? Is googling good or bad for humanity? Is it going to change us. Is Google a potentially mind-controlling monster? Or is just a better librarian?
”HM

Replies to this message:
 Message 2 by AdminWounded, posted 11-01-2007 1:29 PM Fosdick has not replied
 Message 4 by jar, posted 11-01-2007 1:36 PM Fosdick has not replied
 Message 5 by Archer Opteryx, posted 11-01-2007 1:41 PM Fosdick has replied
 Message 6 by Modulous, posted 11-01-2007 1:44 PM Fosdick has replied
 Message 9 by crashfrog, posted 11-01-2007 2:25 PM Fosdick has replied
 Message 10 by bluescat48, posted 11-01-2007 2:31 PM Fosdick has replied
 Message 11 by kuresu, posted 11-01-2007 2:35 PM Fosdick has not replied
 Message 17 by Taz, posted 11-01-2007 4:03 PM Fosdick has not replied
 Message 31 by arachnophilia, posted 11-01-2007 9:37 PM Fosdick has not replied
 Message 49 by Omnivorous, posted 11-02-2007 12:23 PM Fosdick has replied
 Message 72 by Hyroglyphx, posted 11-02-2007 9:11 PM Fosdick has replied
 Message 91 by anglagard, posted 11-09-2007 6:37 PM Fosdick has replied

  
AdminWounded
Inactive Member


Message 2 of 120 (431663)
11-01-2007 1:29 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Fosdick
11-01-2007 12:50 PM


Do you even need to submit coffee House topics as PNT's? Either way this looks good to me.
TTFN,
AW

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Fosdick, posted 11-01-2007 12:50 PM Fosdick has not replied

  
AdminWounded
Inactive Member


Message 3 of 120 (431664)
11-01-2007 1:33 PM


Thread moved here from the Proposed New Topics forum.

  
jar
Member (Idle past 416 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 4 of 120 (431667)
11-01-2007 1:36 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Fosdick
11-01-2007 12:50 PM


An earlier thread on the subject
In The Loss of Serendipity we discussed part of this issue.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Fosdick, posted 11-01-2007 12:50 PM Fosdick has not replied

  
Archer Opteryx
Member (Idle past 3619 days)
Posts: 1811
From: East Asia
Joined: 08-16-2006


Message 5 of 120 (431669)
11-01-2007 1:41 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Fosdick
11-01-2007 12:50 PM


What's so bad about it? I wish more people had a Googling habit.
How many times do we see discussions hit potholes because a participant can't be bothered to open a window and look up something?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Fosdick, posted 11-01-2007 12:50 PM Fosdick has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 8 by Fosdick, posted 11-01-2007 2:15 PM Archer Opteryx has replied

  
Modulous
Member
Posts: 7801
From: Manchester, UK
Joined: 05-01-2005


Message 6 of 120 (431670)
11-01-2007 1:44 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Fosdick
11-01-2007 12:50 PM


Brother,
There is a place for you at the Church of Google. Take a pew and submit to the Lord's indomitable Will.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Fosdick, posted 11-01-2007 12:50 PM Fosdick has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 7 by Fosdick, posted 11-01-2007 2:11 PM Modulous has not replied

  
Fosdick 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5522 days)
Posts: 1793
From: Upper Slobovia
Joined: 12-11-2006


Message 7 of 120 (431674)
11-01-2007 2:11 PM
Reply to: Message 6 by Modulous
11-01-2007 1:44 PM


Re: Brother,
There is a place for you at the Church of Google. Take a pew and submit to the Lord's indomitable Will.
Amen, brother.
quote:
We at the Church of Google believe the search engine Google is the closest humankind has ever come to directly experiencing an actual God (as typically defined).
I can see now more easiliy that this notion of Google Is Lord is not new. Still, the quantum-mechanical aspects of it are interesting. I think I see versions of actions-at-a-distance, or entanglements, very large number of participants, and collapsing wave functions. Could be the closest thing we have to a quantized human consciousness.
”HM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 6 by Modulous, posted 11-01-2007 1:44 PM Modulous has not replied

  
Fosdick 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5522 days)
Posts: 1793
From: Upper Slobovia
Joined: 12-11-2006


Message 8 of 120 (431675)
11-01-2007 2:15 PM
Reply to: Message 5 by Archer Opteryx
11-01-2007 1:41 PM


Just a better librarian?
AO writes:
What's so bad about it? I wish more people had a Googling habit.
How many times do we see discussions hit potholes because a participant can't be bothered to open a window and look up something?
So you think Google is just a better librarian?
”HM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by Archer Opteryx, posted 11-01-2007 1:41 PM Archer Opteryx has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 34 by Archer Opteryx, posted 11-02-2007 12:37 AM Fosdick has not replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1488 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 9 of 120 (431679)
11-01-2007 2:25 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Fosdick
11-01-2007 12:50 PM


Google could even be the new threat to our free will and self-determination.
You're right, of course, which is why all human civilization came to an end when they invented encyclopedias and people could just look stuff up in them.
Oh, wait. That's not what happened at all?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Fosdick, posted 11-01-2007 12:50 PM Fosdick has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 12 by Fosdick, posted 11-01-2007 2:44 PM crashfrog has replied

  
bluescat48
Member (Idle past 4211 days)
Posts: 2347
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2007


Message 10 of 120 (431681)
11-01-2007 2:31 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Fosdick
11-01-2007 12:50 PM


Only use it when I need info.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Fosdick, posted 11-01-2007 12:50 PM Fosdick has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 13 by Fosdick, posted 11-01-2007 2:49 PM bluescat48 has replied

  
kuresu
Member (Idle past 2535 days)
Posts: 2544
From: boulder, colorado
Joined: 03-24-2006


Message 11 of 120 (431683)
11-01-2007 2:35 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Fosdick
11-01-2007 12:50 PM


heathen, you are
google?
who uses google!?
wiki or yahoo for me.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Fosdick, posted 11-01-2007 12:50 PM Fosdick has not replied

  
Fosdick 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5522 days)
Posts: 1793
From: Upper Slobovia
Joined: 12-11-2006


Message 12 of 120 (431688)
11-01-2007 2:44 PM
Reply to: Message 9 by crashfrog
11-01-2007 2:25 PM


You're right, of course, which is why all human civilization came to an end when they invented encyclopedias and people could just look stuff up in them.
Oh, wait. That's not what happened at all?
I've googled a lot of stuff you can't find in any encyclopedia. Besides, didn't Diderot fuel a revolution when he wrote the Encyclopedia? Your trouble here is that you're too young to see the fuller sweep of history. You need to consult with older people more often.
”HM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by crashfrog, posted 11-01-2007 2:25 PM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 14 by crashfrog, posted 11-01-2007 2:50 PM Fosdick has not replied
 Message 15 by kuresu, posted 11-01-2007 3:22 PM Fosdick has replied
 Message 71 by Buzsaw, posted 11-02-2007 8:59 PM Fosdick has not replied

  
Fosdick 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5522 days)
Posts: 1793
From: Upper Slobovia
Joined: 12-11-2006


Message 13 of 120 (431689)
11-01-2007 2:49 PM
Reply to: Message 10 by bluescat48
11-01-2007 2:31 PM


Are you googleable?
Only use it when I need info.
bluescat48, have you every asked yourself "Am I googleable?" The world is now divided into two subspecies of virtual humans, those who are googleable and those who are not.
”HM
Edited by Hoot Mon, : Subtitle added

This message is a reply to:
 Message 10 by bluescat48, posted 11-01-2007 2:31 PM bluescat48 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 47 by bluescat48, posted 11-02-2007 12:05 PM Fosdick has replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1488 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 14 of 120 (431690)
11-01-2007 2:50 PM
Reply to: Message 12 by Fosdick
11-01-2007 2:44 PM


Besides, didn't Diderot fuel a revolution when he wrote the Encyclopedia?
I don't recall it being a revolution that threated human free will, as you suggest.
You need to consult with older people more often.
I try but they're always yelling at me to turn off my devil music and get off their lawn.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 12 by Fosdick, posted 11-01-2007 2:44 PM Fosdick has not replied

  
kuresu
Member (Idle past 2535 days)
Posts: 2544
From: boulder, colorado
Joined: 03-24-2006


Message 15 of 120 (431694)
11-01-2007 3:22 PM
Reply to: Message 12 by Fosdick
11-01-2007 2:44 PM


Your trouble here is that you're too young to see the fuller sweep of history.
Same applies to you, gramps.
Unless, that is, you are as old as human civilization.
Keep in mind that not even historians can see the fuller sweep of history, we can only see parts in that which we specialize.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 12 by Fosdick, posted 11-01-2007 2:44 PM Fosdick has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 16 by Fosdick, posted 11-01-2007 4:03 PM kuresu has replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024