And that, which cannot be described looked down on a creation. "Why are you here?". One must realize there was no reason for this creation's existence. A creation capable of a varied range of action, emotion, blessed with a palette of literal freedom it breathes. And that, which cannot be described spoke in man's tongue, in man's action, on man's palette and It said "You are
special, you are
special, you are." For one becomes distressed knowing that it's existence, it's purpose is survival and that it's dominance is but a natural epoch of the animal kingdom, that man wasn't made in power but man rose from nothing in violence and death, from little homo erectus, from habilis, from Sahelanthropus and now. I won't follow the instructions of a simple one who paraphrased Voltaire unknowingly in her "
Invent a religion" statement (it does make me feel better). Amazing how man can become irate when you question it's purpose. The creation saw the world about him and wondered where to start, for everything here is perfectly fit for It to live and thrive, there's no sound in space. Why one has a conscience is is hard to reason if it was not instilled in it by a God. A better explanation in terms of Natural Selection? Those that cared survived, for they were vital for the group but one does not understand how did this TRAIT COME ABOUT, how did any trait come about, any personality or shape of an organism or object, how does something change to something it never knew? "Ah, mutation my friend!" says those that glorify reason (the abusers of the Socratic method in some cases), but does this person realize I am challenging the existence of anything, of everything, of all the laws of the universe that guides, binds, and provides an environment for abiogenesis to occur. The shape of atoms, the qualities of molecules, why? It is a very interesting mystery indeed. For if one does not see this problem then he/she is simply not thinking into the depths of physical reality, our environment. I am only giving a hint of the advancement of the teleological argument(I am slowly devising).
And man exists, was there a "hunter-gatherer problem", as in man was not allowed to flourish intellectually? Possibly.
Man multiplied and man sinned. Man killed and man kills, man is a murderer, from Prehistory (before written word) until now man has hurt fellow man and man has been consumed by trivialities. There are many sociological reasons for the human condition or nature. Man will be forever defined by his environment. Is it a tragedy? I ask
That which cannot be described "Is this a tragedy?" What is the reason for this absurd world with these creatures that cannot be you, that are severely limited, their mind's mobility is limited, what for. What does it mean for man to exist, why? There are no reasons. Creatures killing eachother and dying. There is an afterlife, but again for what reason?
Afterlife hypothesis:
Hell- Those that take advantage of others in the system, those that meaninglessly exploit others for trivial purposes and do not realize they exist, fully treat people as means(Kant).
Nonexistence- Those that never realize they exist.
Heaven- Those that are above this existence and would appreciate such a place (that may or not be eternal bliss, mind numbing, to be outside of existence (I Heart Huckabees, the ball), that is all speculation).
I guess I must accept the Genesis, and it predestined us, it predestined us...
™ Version 4.2