DarkStar is Taking a Break

DarkStar has been unresponsive and impolite in the Intelligent Design forum.His priviledges in that Forum have been revoked for a day or so.I suggest, DS, that you stop insulting individuals and start responding in a way conducive to good debate.When asked to explain terms you have made up you will do so if you want to retain posting rights. When asked to show your evidence or reasoning for any assertions you make it is required by forum guidelines that you do so.Thank you, I look forward to seeing your full rights restored.

Not apparently repentant but his rights are fully restored. (for now).

DarkStar will be taking a somewhat longer break. I'd be willing to entertain any comments on this but don't feel he is making a valuable contribution right now.{See http://EvC Forum: How does Complexity demonstrate Design -->EvC Forum: How does Complexity demonstrate Design for context - Adminnemooseus}This message has been edited by Adminnemooseus, 06-28-2004 10:32 PM

Why don't you just banish him to the FFA Forum ?You obviously cannot be objective concerning this debater. Little by little any theist with some flair is being chased leaving you all with the idiot fundies to stroke your feel good egos.

Somehow I doubt that you and I define "flair" in the same way. I'm not so much interested in flair as in honest debate.Someone who discusses ideas and evidence. Someone who actually reads the others posts and responds to them. Someone who understands their limitations. DarkStar shows little understanding of the process.Perhaps you can define "idiot fundies" and demonstarte how they could be construed as "stroking egos".

That kinda didn't make sense to me either, I must say.Does this mean that Buz generally agrees with Ned?

According to message 16 in the Suggestions and Question forum Professionalism or Prejudice...you suspended MrHambre...why?

I did? I will check.added by editI was careless and replied to the wrong post.It was in reference to DarkStar.Since he has shown no hint that he knows why he was suspended and hasn't, that I recall, actually debated here I haven't been inclined to change anything.This message has been edited by AdminNosy, 07-13-2004 11:13 AM

Have you ever really really read his posts? I am simply amazed by how many words he could use to describe crap.

---

The Laminator

​

I am suspended.Ken is suspended.Dark Star is suspended.The real reason we are suspended is because of our perceived threat to your evo "truth".Theist members who kiss evo asteroid are more interested in pseudo-friendship than the truth.Non-threatening theists are tolerated so the evos can feel superior.

Too funny. LOL.

---

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

Non-threatening theist??????? as opposed to a threatening theist? What F&%*#@ is that a oxymoron, or just moronic?

I am the one who suspended DS. The general reason is that he doesn't contribute jack squat to a real debate. The trigger was his impoliteness on top of that.If you would care to be specific about the "threat" he posed we might have a short discussion of it.A "threat" would consists of a specific idea backed by evidence and good logic. I don't recall anything of that sort from DS.You still have room to offer up evidence for some very interesting claims that you made regarding the great pyramid. Perhaps you should spend the time finding that.

Thanks for the clarification...in his clever mimicing/poking fun at DarkStar, I was worried that Hambre had inadvertently been suspended..