Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 65 (9073 total)
66 online now:
AZPaul3, kjsimons, PaulK, Tangle, Tanypteryx (5 members, 61 visitors)
Newest Member: MidwestPaul
Post Volume: Total: 893,288 Year: 4,400/6,534 Month: 614/900 Week: 138/182 Day: 18/27 Hour: 0/3

Announcements: Security Update Released


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The first real intelligent design experiment
goldenlightArchangel
Member (Idle past 391 days)
Posts: 583
From: Roraima Peak
Joined: 02-11-2004


Message 1 of 30 (425557)
10-02-2007 6:01 PM


Is there ever a perfect design in the first instruction of Genesis?

Hi,

Topic proposal: let him/her answer this question: Is it possible to check, by experiment, the validity of the first instruction in the Initial time?

I'd say Yes. The first instruction of Genesis says From the fruits of the solid trees you can freely eat, except the one that is fruit and food at one time --paraphrased transcription--;

and he/she would keep his/her medulla oblongata and nervous system as new,
because a lot of calcium, proteins and hormones would not have to be constantly released from his/her brain in order for the production of the gastric juice that is necessary to digest a whole lot of food and dead flesh.

The term solid tree is utilized to make the distinction between actual trees --e.g. avocado tree-- and plants that are palm-trees or of soft trunk.

Sample of fruits from the appropriate solid trees and their order of priority:
1st. life-fruit (Morinda Citrifolia) 2nd. avocado, 3rd. jabuticaba, 4th. persimmon, 5th. equatorial mango, 6th. orange, 7th. fig, 8th. peach, 9th. tropical tangerine, 10th. pomegranate, 11th. tamarindo, 12th. jackfruit, 13th. acerola, 14th. plum.

The only fruit of solid tree that is fruit and food at the same time: olive -- the fruit that introduced to man the mortal desires of the temporary pleasures of knowing a food again and again endlessly --the type of knowledge that is of good and evil consequences at the same time--.

1 ml of olive oil is enough to change the density and quality of intragastric acidity, and then cause his/her nervous system to work incompatible to the initial feeding mode and perfection to which it was designed, but with an extreme predisposition to be hungry for food --id est the mode of incompatibility--.

NOTE: The fruits from the appropriate solid trees are not food. If they were then it would be easy for one to eat the fruits alone for 7 weeks.

Not recommended: sweeteners, coffee, cafeine, cocoa powder, hazelnut, cashewnut, walnuts, pistachio and almonds, because the butter and oil properties of the seeds, if consumed during a permanent abstinence of food, do cause him/her to be desperately hungry for food.

Highly not recommended: fruits from palm-trees (e.g. coconut, banana..), fruits from soft trunk trees (e.g. papaya), kiwi, pineapple, strawberry, and all fruits that are not from the compatible solid trees, because the consumption of these fruits, during a total and permanent abstinence of food, tends to gradually cause nervous system distortions, irritability and unreasonable anger.

§§§§§§§

Experiment: to eat only the compatible fruits the Initial instruction points out.
Estimate time to initiate reduction of intragastric acidity: 3 and a half weeks.
Approximate time to activate the deceleration of the aging process: 49 days and then the nervous system will be compatible to the initial feeding mode.

Has anyone eaten only the fruits from the trees that were made intelligently compatible to the perfection of the initial purpose to which your nervous system was designed?

What would you lose besides the temporary desire for a momentary pleasure and a whole lot of health problems which result from eating food that perishes and dead flesh?

What if one eats only the compatible fruits that the first eternal instruction points out?
There are so many special people in the world and would he/she not keep his/her garment--body as new, and his/her wineskin--nervous system-- as new?

In the time that the groom is taken away, then there'll be an abstinence of food in those days. --paraphrased transcription--.

No one sews a patch of unshrunk cloth on an old garment.
And no one puts new wine into old wineskins.

Significance of old garment: It is not possible to remediate or restore, by consumption of food, the nutrients and properties that are unsubstitutable and intrinsically human like the medulla oblongata.

See through this point of view: An electric generator does not produce enough power to keep itself operating;

Also the consumption of food, dead flesh or anything that is not a fruit from the appropriate solid trees will never be enough to restore the initial amount of calcium, proteins and hormones that are released from the brain in order for the production of the gastric juice that is necessary to digest that same food.

§§§§§§§ §§§§§§§ §§§§§§§

Even if you hold yourself the only possible solution that decelerates the aging process is not to waste more nutrients and hormones. This solution implies fidelity --id est the giving of the right of precedency-- to the first eternal instruction from the Initial time, by eating only the fruits from the actual trees. -- text from Deceleration Diet -- a transcription by Zsháfir

§§§§§§§

Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : subtitle

Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : paragraph

Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : new subtitle

Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : olive

Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : solution

Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : Zsháfir

Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : question

Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : fidelitate

Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : enter line

Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : size 5


Replies to this message:
 Message 2 by AdminNosy, posted 10-02-2007 7:48 PM goldenlightArchangel has replied
 Message 19 by Otto Tellick, posted 08-16-2008 2:48 AM goldenlightArchangel has taken no action
 Message 23 by randman, posted 08-19-2008 2:47 AM goldenlightArchangel has replied

  
AdminNosy
Administrator
Posts: 4754
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Joined: 11-11-2003


Message 2 of 30 (425577)
10-02-2007 7:48 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by goldenlightArchangel
10-02-2007 6:01 PM


sorry again
CD7, I'm sorry but you seem to be unable to make sense. You may be saying very profound things but I sure can't understand you.

You've had a few tries now but it isn't getting better.

I suggest that you restrict yourself to replying on existing threads and being very careful to focus on the topic.

It is also possible that you have a very apt name.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by goldenlightArchangel, posted 10-02-2007 6:01 PM goldenlightArchangel has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by goldenlightArchangel, posted 10-04-2007 5:31 PM AdminNosy has replied

  
goldenlightArchangel
Member (Idle past 391 days)
Posts: 583
From: Roraima Peak
Joined: 02-11-2004


Message 3 of 30 (425989)
10-04-2007 5:31 PM
Reply to: Message 2 by AdminNosy
10-02-2007 7:48 PM


Eternal instruction points out the solution to decelerate the aging

Hi AdminNosy,
now the elements of text and message might be more understandable,

quote:
Topic proposal: let him/her answer this question: Is it possible to check, by experiment, the validity of the first instruction in the Initial time?

I'd say Yes. The first instruction of Genesis says From the fruits of the solid trees you can freely eat, except the one that is fruit and food at one time --paraphrased transcription--;

and he/she would keep his/her medulla oblongata and nervous system as new,
because a lot of calcium, proteins and hormones would not have to be constantly released from his/her brain in order for the production of the gastric juice that is necessary to digest a whole lot of food and dead flesh.

The term solid tree is utilized to make the distinction between actual trees --e.g. avocado tree-- and plants that are palm-trees or of soft trunk.

Sample of fruits from the appropriate solid trees and their order of priority:
1st. life-fruit (Morinda Citrifolia) 2nd. avocado, 3rd. jabuticaba, 4th. persimmon, 5th. equatorial mango, 6th. orange, 7th. fig, 8th. peach, 9th. tropical tangerine, 10th. pomegranate, 11th. tamarindo, 12th. jackfruit, 13th. acerola, 14th. plum.

The only fruit of solid tree that is fruit and food at the same time: olive -- the fruit that introduced to man the mortal desires of the temporary pleasures of knowing a food again and again endlessly --the type of knowledge that is of good and evil consequences at the same time--.

1 ml of olive oil is enough to change the density and quality of intragastric acidity, and then cause his/her nervous system to work incompatible to the initial feeding mode and perfection to which it was designed, but with an extreme predisposition to be hungry for food --id est the mode of incompatibility--.

NOTE: The fruits from the appropriate solid trees are not food. If they were then it would be easy for one to eat the fruits alone for 7 weeks.

Not recommended: sweeteners, coffee, cafeine, cocoa powder, hazelnut, cashewnut, walnuts, pistachio and almonds, because the butter and oil properties of the seeds, if consumed during a permanent abstinence of food, do cause him/her to be desperately hungry for food.

Highly not recommended: fruits from palm-trees (e.g. coconut, banana..), fruits from soft trunk trees (e.g. papaya), kiwi, pineapple, strawberry, and all fruits that are not from the compatible solid trees, because the consumption of these fruits, during a total and permanent abstinence of food, tends to gradually cause nervous system distortions, irritability and unreasonable anger.

§§§§§§§

Experiment: to eat only the compatible fruits the Initial instruction points out.
Estimate time to initiate reduction of intragastric acidity: 3 and a half weeks.
Approximate time to activate the deceleration of the aging process: 49 days and then the nervous system will be compatible to the initial feeding mode.

Has anyone eaten only the fruits from the trees that were made intelligently compatible to the perfection of the initial purpose to which your nervous system was designed?

What would you lose besides the temporary desire for a momentary pleasure and a whole lot of health problems which result from eating food that perishes and dead flesh?

What if one eats only the compatible fruits that the first eternal instruction points out?
There are so many special people in the world and would he/she not keep his/her garment--body as new, and his/her wineskin--nervous system-- as new?

In the time that the groom is taken away, then there'll be an abstinence of food in those days. --paraphrased transcription--.

No one sews a patch of unshrunk cloth on an old garment.
And no one puts new wine into old wineskins.

Significance of old garment: It is not possible to remediate or restore, by consumption of food, the nutrients and properties that are unsubstitutable and intrinsically human like the medulla oblongata.

See through this point of view: An electric generator does not produce enough power to keep itself operating;

Also the consumption of food, dead flesh or anything that is not a fruit from the appropriate solid trees will never be enough to restore the initial amount of calcium, proteins and hormones that are released from the brain in order for the production of the gastric juice that is necessary to digest that same food.

§§§§§§§ §§§§§§§ §§§§§§§

Even if you hold yourself the only possible solution that decelerates the aging process is not to waste more nutrients and hormones. This solution implies fidelity --id est the giving of the right of precedency-- to the first eternal instruction from the Initial time, by eating only the fruits from the actual trees. -- text from Deceleration Diet -- a transcription by Zsháfir

§§§§§§§


Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : Zsháfir

Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : question

Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : fidelitate

Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : enter line

Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : size=5


This message is a reply to:
 Message 2 by AdminNosy, posted 10-02-2007 7:48 PM AdminNosy has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 6 by AdminNosy, posted 10-11-2007 10:16 AM goldenlightArchangel has replied

  
Admin
Director
Posts: 12793
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.1


Message 4 of 30 (427353)
10-11-2007 9:24 AM


Bump for AdminNosy
^Bump^


--Percy
EvC Forum Director

Replies to this message:
 Message 5 by AdminNosy, posted 10-11-2007 10:08 AM Admin has taken no action

  
AdminNosy
Administrator
Posts: 4754
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Joined: 11-11-2003


Message 5 of 30 (427374)
10-11-2007 10:08 AM
Reply to: Message 4 by Admin
10-11-2007 9:24 AM


Re: Bump for AdminNosy
Thanks heaps.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by Admin, posted 10-11-2007 9:24 AM Admin has taken no action

  
AdminNosy
Administrator
Posts: 4754
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Joined: 11-11-2003


Message 6 of 30 (427378)
10-11-2007 10:16 AM
Reply to: Message 3 by goldenlightArchangel
10-04-2007 5:31 PM


Lots of words
CrazyDiamond you have a wonderful bunch of words here. They actually add up to a topic.

Do you actually want this in the intelligent design thread?

You know that is a science thread and you will have to back up everything you say, don't you?


This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by goldenlightArchangel, posted 10-04-2007 5:31 PM goldenlightArchangel has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 7 by goldenlightArchangel, posted 10-11-2007 4:01 PM AdminNosy has taken no action
 Message 8 by goldenlightArchangel, posted 10-18-2007 4:04 PM AdminNosy has taken no action

  
goldenlightArchangel
Member (Idle past 391 days)
Posts: 583
From: Roraima Peak
Joined: 02-11-2004


Message 7 of 30 (427475)
10-11-2007 4:01 PM
Reply to: Message 6 by AdminNosy
10-11-2007 10:16 AM


Re: Lots of words
Hi AdminNosy,

I'd like this in Theological Creationism and ID,

Thank You

§§§§§§§


This message is a reply to:
 Message 6 by AdminNosy, posted 10-11-2007 10:16 AM AdminNosy has taken no action

  
goldenlightArchangel
Member (Idle past 391 days)
Posts: 583
From: Roraima Peak
Joined: 02-11-2004


Message 8 of 30 (429116)
10-18-2007 4:04 PM
Reply to: Message 6 by AdminNosy
10-11-2007 10:16 AM


Aleatory Versus Random

Hi AdminNosy,

The word aleatory which means dependent on chance, is one of these little words that, although are true words, very few actually use in a normal conversation.

But if I have to name this Experiment or diet plan, I would rather utilize the word aleatory than random, because the word random has more than two meanings.

The intrinsic and natural rhythm of the nervous system's acceptability is very aleatory, spontaneous and unpredictable like the wind,

just like the living electricity--spirit-energy that runs through the nerves,
because the wind blows where it pleases, and you hear its sound, but it is not possible to predict where it comes from or where it is going..

Also the contentment cannot be controlled or ruled by the clock, but comprehended and ascertained,

Aleatory plan is the process in which the initial adaptation to the Experiment will gradually result in true Experiment that might result in deceleration of the aging process.

Example: how many days without food would be in the adaptation to the deceleration plan,

simple solution: give the nervous system time by applying this aleatory/random diet plan for adaptation time:

Eat the compatible fruits in the morning, afternoom and evening,
and then eat your favorite foods once a day always after the evening, in aleatory/random days,

also eat bread twice a week in the morning, in aleatory/random weeks,

In aleatory/random days, eat food once a day, after the evening.
also, eat food twice or three times a week in aleatory/random weeks,

Always keeping the right fruits constantly at hand, he/she would always prepare his/her own foods, until the time and year he/she sees that the impossible had become possible -- because then he/she would have retained all the knowledge that is required to make the division between the good and evil by eating only the fruits from the compatible trees.

§§§§§§§


This message is a reply to:
 Message 6 by AdminNosy, posted 10-11-2007 10:16 AM AdminNosy has taken no action

  
Admin
Director
Posts: 12793
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.1


Message 9 of 30 (430594)
10-26-2007 8:18 AM


Bump for AdminNosy
^Bump^

  
AdminNosy
Administrator
Posts: 4754
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Joined: 11-11-2003


Message 10 of 30 (430605)
10-26-2007 10:17 AM


Thread moved here from the Proposed New Topics forum.

  
goldenlightArchangel
Member (Idle past 391 days)
Posts: 583
From: Roraima Peak
Joined: 02-11-2004


Message 11 of 30 (430653)
10-26-2007 2:50 PM


Quitting the mode of incompatibility
Hi,

Directive I - The system is found incompatible to the function of the initial purpose to which it was designed.

Directive II - The recent feeding has caused the system to operate in the mode of incompatibility and will be restarted.

Directive III - Please quit the mode of incompatibility by applying the appropriate feeding in the recipient.

Estimate time to restart: 49 days and then the nervous system will be compatible to the initial feeding mode.

§§§§§§§ §§§§§§§

Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : *


  
Rrhain
Member (Idle past 1111 days)
Posts: 6349
From: San Diego, CA, USA
Joined: 05-03-2003


Message 12 of 30 (430808)
10-27-2007 5:59 PM


I'm sorry, there's still no substance here
There's an awful lot of attempted poetry, but not actual substance.

Stop trying to make profound statements, CrazyDiamond7. Simplicity will help you so much more. Specificity will make it worthwhile.


Rrhain

Thank you for your submission to Science. Your paper was reviewed by a jury of seventh graders so that they could look for balance and to allow them to make up their own minds. We are sorry to say that they found your paper "bogus," specifically describing the section on the laboratory work "boring." We regret that we will be unable to publish your work at this time.

Replies to this message:
 Message 13 by Taz, posted 10-27-2007 9:17 PM Rrhain has taken no action
 Message 14 by goldenlightArchangel, posted 10-29-2007 3:16 PM Rrhain has taken no action
 Message 15 by goldenlightArchangel, posted 06-09-2008 1:56 PM Rrhain has taken no action

  
Taz
Member (Idle past 2530 days)
Posts: 5069
From: Zerus
Joined: 07-18-2006


Message 13 of 30 (430838)
10-27-2007 9:17 PM
Reply to: Message 12 by Rrhain
10-27-2007 5:59 PM


Attention Brad McFall
In the past, I have asked him whether he's a native English speaker or not. I think it was him that answered "I was born crying English".

But no matter what, I still can't believe he's actually a native English speaker. I'd really like Brad McFall to try to converse with him. I'd pay real money to see the two talk to each other.


Disclaimer:

Occasionally, owing to the deficiency of the English language, I have used he/him/his meaning he or she/him or her/his or her in order to avoid awkwardness of style.

He, him, and his are not intended as exclusively masculine pronouns. They may refer to either sex or to both sexes!


This message is a reply to:
 Message 12 by Rrhain, posted 10-27-2007 5:59 PM Rrhain has taken no action

  
goldenlightArchangel
Member (Idle past 391 days)
Posts: 583
From: Roraima Peak
Joined: 02-11-2004


Message 14 of 30 (431146)
10-29-2007 3:16 PM
Reply to: Message 12 by Rrhain
10-27-2007 5:59 PM


Impossibility of profit from eating the same properties the human body was made of

quote:

..not actual substance. Simplicity will help you so much more. Specificity will make it worthwhile.


Hi Rrhain,

Simplicity: food is made of the dust of the ground. You become what you eat.

Continue to eat food and then that’s what you’ll become: dust of the ground.

Specificity: the nutrient properties of the fruits from the compatible trees aren’t made of the dust of the ground,

but of filtered properties made of the solid trees,
whose trunk is made up of millions of little bitty tubes that do filter all that must be purified and separate out in order for the fruit nutrients to be an exclusive property of the tree itself.

§§§§§§§

quote:
..still no substance..

There are three actual substances on this, attested by eternal words in the Initial time:

1st. – It is not possible to profit from eating the nutrient properties which the food and bread are made of,

2nd. – because your body was made of the same nutrient properties from the dust of the ground.

3rd. – For continuing to eat food or bread he/she tends to return to the dust of the ground.

§§§§§§§ §§§§§§§


This message is a reply to:
 Message 12 by Rrhain, posted 10-27-2007 5:59 PM Rrhain has taken no action

  
goldenlightArchangel
Member (Idle past 391 days)
Posts: 583
From: Roraima Peak
Joined: 02-11-2004


Message 15 of 30 (470108)
06-09-2008 1:56 PM
Reply to: Message 12 by Rrhain
10-27-2007 5:59 PM


Origin of filtered nutrient properties

The nutrient properties of the fruits from the compatible trees are not made of the dust of the earth because they are filtered properties made of the solid trees.

Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : *


This message is a reply to:
 Message 12 by Rrhain, posted 10-27-2007 5:59 PM Rrhain has taken no action

Replies to this message:
 Message 17 by Dr Jack, posted 08-15-2008 4:56 AM goldenlightArchangel has taken no action

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.1
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2022