Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,824 Year: 4,081/9,624 Month: 952/974 Week: 279/286 Day: 40/46 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Ken
nator
Member (Idle past 2197 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 1 of 5 (90472)
03-05-2004 7:59 AM


I think we have a Syamsu situation with Kendemyer.
The fact that he had trouble learning to use the correct reply button was a bit of a red flag to Zhimbo that Ken could have some frontal lobe brain damage.
This could also account for his inability to stay on topic, organize his thoughts, etc.
So, I think it's likely that we are dealing with someone with brain damage.

Replies to this message:
 Message 2 by MrHambre, posted 03-05-2004 8:24 AM nator has not replied
 Message 3 by Syamsu, posted 03-06-2004 9:53 AM nator has not replied

  
MrHambre
Member (Idle past 1420 days)
Posts: 1495
From: Framingham, MA, USA
Joined: 06-23-2003


Message 2 of 5 (90474)
03-05-2004 8:24 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by nator
03-05-2004 7:59 AM


Lobe and Hate
This must mean Zhimbo's itching to lose a Great Debate to the Kenster. May the better man win!
regards,
Esteban "Occipital" Hambre
[This message has been edited and edited and edited by MrHambre, 03-05-2004]
[This message has been re-edited by MrHambre, 03-05-2004]
[This message has been edited by MrHambre, 03-05-2004]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by nator, posted 03-05-2004 7:59 AM nator has not replied

  
Syamsu 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5617 days)
Posts: 1914
From: amsterdam
Joined: 05-19-2002


Message 3 of 5 (90789)
03-06-2004 9:53 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by nator
03-05-2004 7:59 AM


I think you're doing really good Schrafinator, I think you're well on your way to sublimate your putrid anger bubbling under the surface, it's much more more socially acceptable this way. About the "Syamsu situation", I posted the references to the Scopes textbook, which the evolutionist establishment supported, I also posted the reference to Thomas Paine expressely supporting teaching with reference to a creator, in denial of the evolutionary theories which were already about at that time (Erasmus Darwin). You were wrong, to acknowledge that would be the simple way out of this "situation".
regards,
Mohammad Nor Syamsu

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by nator, posted 03-05-2004 7:59 AM nator has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 5 by Dan Carroll, posted 03-08-2004 4:25 PM Syamsu has not replied

  
kendemyer
Inactive Member


Message 4 of 5 (91183)
03-08-2004 4:19 PM


please explain
Someone please explain to me why the evolutionist have links in the links room that address specific issue but the creationist do not. Is EVC Forum wanting only one view expressed. Their website says both are welcome but I believe it is a lie.
Sincerely,
Ken

  
Dan Carroll
Inactive Member


Message 5 of 5 (91185)
03-08-2004 4:25 PM
Reply to: Message 3 by Syamsu
03-06-2004 9:53 AM


quote:
I posted the references to the Scopes textbook, which the evolutionist establishment supported
Well sure, we supported it. But you try saying no to the Freemasons.

"Perhaps you should take your furs and your literal interpretations to the other side of the river."
-Anya

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by Syamsu, posted 03-06-2004 9:53 AM Syamsu has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024