Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 66 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,481 Year: 3,738/9,624 Month: 609/974 Week: 222/276 Day: 62/34 Hour: 1/4


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Why I see creation to be more scientifically correct than evolution.
Aptera
Junior Member (Idle past 5213 days)
Posts: 4
From: Farmington, ME, U.S.
Joined: 01-06-2010


Message 1 of 4 (541844)
01-06-2010 2:32 PM


Ok, start at the beginning, I know that the mathematical probability of god is very bad. I believe in god, that is my choice, people who believe in evolution chose to do so and I respect that. Anyway, here is my argument.
According to the theory of evolution to the extent of my knowledge, the universe originated from an infinitely small, infinitely dense and infinitely hot piece of matter. I'll start here. First, where did this come from? I know a lot of evolutionists do not believe in eternity, but matter cannot be created or destroyed, so where did this come from? Next, why/how did this material spontaneously explode? How did round planets form? Normally when something explodes, it is not round. Rock is denser than the gases in our atmosphere, is it not? So, assuming we have an explosion with sufficient material and conditions to create round planets, wouldn't there be a gas "bubble" near the source of the explosion?
Assuming that earth with it's atmosphere was formed randomly in an explosion, how did life originate? From my study of evolution, this topic is unclear. Whether it be electricity in a pool of chemicals sparking proteins and and amino acids or aliens seeding life on crystals. Again, assuming all up to here could randomly happen, (we're talking massive odds here) these amino acids/proteins somehow mutated into a live cell.
Here is an issue with the random mutations theory. All recorded genetic mutations are a direct result of loss of genetic information. There is no possible genetic way to add genetic information through a random mutation. Either these "simple " amino acids and proteins have/had all of the genetic information to create any type of conceivable life, or the theory is invalid. Genetic mutations normally made the animal/person inflicted with them less able to perform their everyday needs. For instance, 6 legged sheep. The extra legs are normally invalid, slowing the animal down. If you can think of a helpful genetic mutation, and one that does not inflict sterility, please post it.
Any questions, post here or message me. Thanks.

"It is better to be silent and thought a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt" - Mark Twain

Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by Admin, posted 01-07-2010 7:07 AM Aptera has not replied
 Message 4 by Admin, posted 01-10-2010 7:45 AM Aptera has not replied

Admin
Director
Posts: 13023
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 1.9


Message 2 of 4 (541982)
01-07-2010 6:59 AM


Thread Copied to Big Bang and Cosmology Forum
Thread copied to the How did round planets form from the explosion of the Big Bang? thread in the Big Bang and Cosmology forum, this copy of the thread has been closed.

Admin
Director
Posts: 13023
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 1.9


Message 3 of 4 (541984)
01-07-2010 7:07 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by Aptera
01-06-2010 2:32 PM


Hi Aptera, welcome aboard.
Here at EvC Forum we try to keep threads tightly focused on a single topic. This is from the Forum Guidelines:
  1. When introducing a new topic, please keep the message narrowly focused. Do not include more than a few points.
So I have promoted part of your thread proposal, the part about planet formation, see How did round planets form from the explosion of the Big Bang?.
If you would like another thread about the origin of life, then please edit your Message 1 to focus on just that topic.
And if you would like still another thread about mutations, then please enter another thread proposal.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Aptera, posted 01-06-2010 2:32 PM Aptera has not replied

Admin
Director
Posts: 13023
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 1.9


Message 4 of 4 (542463)
01-10-2010 7:45 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by Aptera
01-06-2010 2:32 PM


Since you haven't replied I'm going to close this thread, but before doing so I'll just mention that the quote you provided in your signature is not by Mark Twain. The source is actually anonymous.

--Percy
EvC Forum Director

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Aptera, posted 01-06-2010 2:32 PM Aptera has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024