What The Genesis Noaic Flood Would Not Produce.

I am often asked questions in the threads regarding implications of a flood the magnitude of the Genesis Noaic flood. Usually these questions pertain to some aspect of the topic. This thread is proposed in order that different implications of such a deludge may be debated and discussed.Perhaps this will enable members to better understand what the Genesis record actually says and implies relative to that alleged event. Hopefully corroborating all of the implications will also help members to understand why such an event would skew data applied in current dating methodology.

1. It would not produce a climate as warm as pre-flood.
2. It would not produce the same atmosphere, given the volumn of water to accomodate a flood of this magnitude.
3. It would not produce the same elements in the atmosphere of a pre-flood planet which is implicatied due to the volumn of H2O in play
4. It would not produce the same sun rays on the planet as post flood.
5. It would not produce relative uniformity in calculating dating methodology nor would it produce acurate dating data of present dating methodology used.
6. It would not produce similar weather as pre-flood.
7. It would not produce a rainbow-less atmosphere.
8. It would not produce as long a life as that of a warmer uniform atmosphere which filtered out less healthy sun rays.
9. It would not produce as level a planet surface as pre-flood.
10. It would not produce small shallower oceans as would be pre-flood.
11. It would not produce warm polar regions void of ice.
12. It would not produce large continents compared to pre-flood.
13. It would not produce nearly (by far) as little carbon on the planet and it's atmosphere, due to volcanic eruptions, etc.
14. It would not produce the same sub-terrain as pre-flood.

The above list is what comes to mind off the top of my head. There are others which may be proposed.I'll leave the forum for this topic up to the moderators. Edited by Buzsaw, : Correct spelling an apply list format. Edited by Buzsaw, : Upgrading OPEdited by Buzsaw, : No reason given.

---

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

My apologies to admins. I intended this for Proposed New Topics.

Thread moved here from the Suggestions and Questions forum.

Hi Buzsaw,Just three suggestions:

• There are probably more spelling errors than you'd wish there to be.
  ​
• The [list] dBCode would produce a nicer format.
  ​
• Supporting evidence for each point would be very helpful.

---

--	Percy
	EvC Forum Director

This topic is not intended to be about evidence of the Noahic flood, but about implications of what a flood of this magnitude would not produce if (I say if) such a flood had occurred.Whether the flood account is myth or factual, there would be certain implications relative to planet Earth before and after such an event. That is what this thread is intended to be about.

---

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

Hi Buz,In your list you should replace your numbers with [*]. For instance, "1)" would become "[*]", "2) would become "[*]", all the numbers would become "[*]". You say your thread is intended to be about the "implications of what a flood of this magnitude would not produce," but implications from what evidence? For example, what evidence leads you to believe a global flood would affect radiometric dating?

---

--	Percy
	EvC Forum Director

I prefer numbers. A responder may, as in the past say, "your number 5 says......... Numbers also quickly shows the number of total points cited. If later, an additional item comes to mind to list, a new number distinguishes that from the original list.Readers and members of this site are intelligent enough to understand implications of a large body of water of this magnitude suddenly flooding the entire planet, volcanic effect of carbon content, etc, implications that would be assumed, whether myth or fact.If this thread must get bogged down with debating evidence, I'm not interested in doing it. Perhaps Freeforall would be the place for it.

---

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

We all prefer numbers, Buz. Make the edits I told you to, then click "Preview," and prepare to be amazed! Okay. Okay, but you do understand that the Forum Guidelines are not enforced in Free For All? That those who perceive your ideas as determined idiocy and buffoonery can let you have it relentlessly with both barrels? I'll put this in Free For All if you like, but don't come complaining to moderators later.

---

--	Percy
	EvC Forum Director

Mmm, no numbers? Is there a thread in the archives covering this techy stuff which would be beneficial to members, or perhaps, a link for reference? Hey, ne'er worry, Admin. Like my feisty Shiz-Zu Buddy dog, I'll just lift a leg, pee a one-er on their post and move on.

---

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

Nice job, but I forgot one thing.You need to change "[list]" to "[list=1]". The "=1" portion tells it to start the list at 1. Now click "Preview" and be amazed!If you want to read about it there's a help page about dBCodes. Assuming you're typing a message into a message box right now, look to your left. Click on the "help" link for dBCodes.I'll promote your thread to Free For All as soon as you finish your edit.

---

--	Percy
	EvC Forum Director

Woo Hoo! Thanks, Admin!

Thread copied here from the What The Genesis Noaic Flood Would Not Produce. thread in the Proposed New Topics forum.

Wonderful. Another thread about Buz's fantasies with no supporting evidence.*yawn*

---

Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against unintelligible propositions. Ideas must be distinct before reason can act upon them; and no man ever had a distinct idea of the trinity. It is the mere Abracadabra of the mountebanks calling themselves the priests of Jesus. -- Thomas JeffersonFor we know that our patchwork heritage is a strength, not a weakness. We are a nation of Christians and Muslims, Jews and Hindus -- and non-believers. -- Barack ObamaWe see monsters where science shows us windmills. -- PhatIt has always struck me as odd that fundies devote so much time and effort into trying to find a naturalistic explanation for their mythical flood, while looking for magical explanations for things that actually happened. -- Dr. Adequate

NOTHING you ever intend to discuss is ever about evidence. Your "Buzsaw Hypothesis" should actually be called, "An Idiot's Guild to the Universe."Man do I enjoy the Free For All forum.- OniEdited by onifre, : No reason given.

---

Be the first at EvC Forum to own a Dave Mabus shirt

Hey, let's see if we can have some fun in this thread. I bet I will have more posts that Buz ignores than you will. If you're willing to play, we'll probably need some kind of guidelines about the contents of qualifying posts, that sort of thing.What do you say?Edited by subbie, : Subtitle

---

Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against unintelligible propositions. Ideas must be distinct before reason can act upon them; and no man ever had a distinct idea of the trinity. It is the mere Abracadabra of the mountebanks calling themselves the priests of Jesus. -- Thomas JeffersonFor we know that our patchwork heritage is a strength, not a weakness. We are a nation of Christians and Muslims, Jews and Hindus -- and non-believers. -- Barack ObamaWe see monsters where science shows us windmills. -- PhatIt has always struck me as odd that fundies devote so much time and effort into trying to find a naturalistic explanation for their mythical flood, while looking for magical explanations for things that actually happened. -- Dr. Adequate