Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 58 (9206 total)
0 online now:
Newest Member: Fyre1212
Post Volume: Total: 919,412 Year: 6,669/9,624 Month: 9/238 Week: 9/22 Day: 0/9 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The Illusion of Free Will
xongsmith
Member
Posts: 2620
From: massachusetts US
Joined: 01-01-2009


Message 1 of 359 (650692)
02-01-2012 1:32 PM


An interesting subject came up in the "Does science ask and answer "why" questions?" thread:
In Message 349
1.6180339 writes:
Straggler writes:
All the evidence indicates that the entire notion of us consciously making non-deterministic choices is simply false rather than something that demands a mysterious explanation.
It is determined up to a point. The brain activity propagates before consciousness dictates a choice. However who's not to say some quantum entanglement is not going on? That there is indeed some spontaneous collapse of the wave form once a "observation is made" and a choice is made. It is still deterministic, but novel and spontaneous as well. Rather than completely dependent on prior conditions, the choice is chosen by the thinker/observer/subject/person/dude/conscious mind.
So even though it looks on the surface like the choice precedes consciousness, it is in fact spook action at a distance and the apparent time lag is simply our biological hard ware trying to catch up.
In Message 350
straggler writes:
Whatever you need to believe to get you through the day with your subjective notions intact I guess.....
Numbers writes:
However who's not to say some quantum entanglement is not going on?
Why would anyone say that is going on?
Straggler writes:
Do you think quantum computers will have free will?
Numbers writes:
Yes.
Cool!!! I feel a new thread coming on.....
If neither of them have done so, yet, I'd like to propose a thread that can address this.
I'd like to see more on how the Illusion (or a non-illusory manifestation of it as alluded to in 1.6180339's quantum entanglement) of Free Will may also help in understanding things like self-awareness.
Would computers never be able to have anything more than the illusion they had free will, if somehow we had something a little less negative in connotation than "illusion", perhaps along the way of disentanglement? How would we know the difference? What would it matter anyway?
Thank you.

- xongsmith, 5.7d

Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by 1.61803, posted 02-02-2012 10:06 AM xongsmith has not replied
 Message 180 by Jon, posted 02-10-2012 4:03 PM xongsmith has seen this message but not replied

  
Admin
Director
Posts: 13106
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002


Message 2 of 359 (650694)
02-02-2012 9:08 AM


Thread Copied from Proposed New Topics Forum
Thread copied here from the The Illusion of Free Will thread in the Proposed New Topics forum.

  
1.61803
Member (Idle past 1752 days)
Posts: 2928
From: Lone Star State USA
Joined: 02-19-2004


Message 3 of 359 (650699)
02-02-2012 10:06 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by xongsmith
02-01-2012 1:32 PM


will I dream?.......
Hello Xongsmith,
xongsmith writes:
Would computers never be able to have anything more than the illusion they had free will,
Free will has many definitions. So I suppose the best place to start any discussion is to define in your words what do you mean by freewill? As Straggler has pointed out freewill is a dilemma.
It is paradoxical in that strict hard determinism implies no free will and random events implies no free agent. Either way there is no true freewill in either regard in a Compatibilistic view point.
It could be a loop of deterministic events feeding into a cascade of random events further cycling more deterministic causal events.
Although Straggler hates the idea of dualism, sometimes imo things are 'both'. Maybe we need a new term.
causality -->effect+random events=causality-->effect
A computer is a complicated turing device. It can generate random strings of numbers. But for a computer to develop free will it would have to decide one day to not do a calculation it was programmed to do simply because it didnt feel like it.
Will computers ever become sentient and develop freewill. I personally think they will. I mean it happened to our organic processor, it is just a question of when imo.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by xongsmith, posted 02-01-2012 1:32 PM xongsmith has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 4 by Straggler, posted 02-02-2012 11:00 AM 1.61803 has replied
 Message 7 by Dr Adequate, posted 02-02-2012 1:11 PM 1.61803 has replied

  
Straggler
Member (Idle past 314 days)
Posts: 10333
From: London England
Joined: 09-30-2006


Message 4 of 359 (650707)
02-02-2012 11:00 AM
Reply to: Message 3 by 1.61803
02-02-2012 10:06 AM


Re: will I dream?.......
Some have suggested that the internet will one day become sentient and self-aware.
Does the WWW dream of electric sheep?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by 1.61803, posted 02-02-2012 10:06 AM 1.61803 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 5 by 1.61803, posted 02-02-2012 11:16 AM Straggler has replied
 Message 6 by Perdition, posted 02-02-2012 12:15 PM Straggler has replied

  
1.61803
Member (Idle past 1752 days)
Posts: 2928
From: Lone Star State USA
Joined: 02-19-2004


Message 5 of 359 (650710)
02-02-2012 11:16 AM
Reply to: Message 4 by Straggler
02-02-2012 11:00 AM


Re: will I dream?.......
Does the WWW dream of electric sheep?
Nah, just sheep shaggers!
Edited by 1.61803, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by Straggler, posted 02-02-2012 11:00 AM Straggler has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 10 by Straggler, posted 02-02-2012 1:57 PM 1.61803 has seen this message but not replied

  
Perdition
Member (Idle past 3486 days)
Posts: 1593
From: Wisconsin
Joined: 05-15-2003


(2)
Message 6 of 359 (650713)
02-02-2012 12:15 PM
Reply to: Message 4 by Straggler
02-02-2012 11:00 AM


Re: will I dream?.......
Some have suggested that the internet will one day become sentient and self-aware.
I think at least a part of what makes us sentient is quantum mechanics. When you think, certain neurons fire, sending electrical signals down other neurons. Whenever you have an electrical signal, there is a non-zero chance that the electron will tunnel to a different neuron. I think this is partially how our "leaps of logic" come about. When you're thinking of something, it can trigger, almost mysteriously, a different thought. Quite often, this different thought is similar in some way to the one you were originally pursuing. It's how House solves almost all of his medical cases on TV.
Some of this is caused by the tight clustering of neurons and the fact that the chenicals that cross synapses are not specifically directed, but some of it, I'm convinced, comes from quantum tunneling.
So, before a computer or the internet could become "aware" there would need to be a chance of signals triggering other signals unintended by anyone, not just by being hacked or stolen, or likewise and if you want this aware computer to not be schizophrenic, the triggered "thoughts" should be at least tangentially related to the original thought, not merely random musings.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by Straggler, posted 02-02-2012 11:00 AM Straggler has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 8 by Straggler, posted 02-02-2012 1:45 PM Perdition has replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 7 of 359 (650722)
02-02-2012 1:11 PM
Reply to: Message 3 by 1.61803
02-02-2012 10:06 AM


Re: will I dream?.......
It is paradoxical in that strict hard determinism implies no free will ...
Why?
Either way there is no true freewill in either regard in a Compatibilistic view point.
Well, this is untrue simply by definition. By definition, the compatibilist viewpoint is that one can have determinism and free will simultaneously. You may argue that this viewpoint is wrong, but you cannot argue that this is not the compatibilist viewpoint, because that is exactly what the compatibilist viewpoint is.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by 1.61803, posted 02-02-2012 10:06 AM 1.61803 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 12 by 1.61803, posted 02-02-2012 5:52 PM Dr Adequate has replied

  
Straggler
Member (Idle past 314 days)
Posts: 10333
From: London England
Joined: 09-30-2006


Message 8 of 359 (650729)
02-02-2012 1:45 PM
Reply to: Message 6 by Perdition
02-02-2012 12:15 PM


Re: will I dream?.......
Is there any evidence to suggest that the brain uses quantum superposition, tunnelling etc. to function? As far as I am aware there is no evidence that the brain is anything more than a chemical computer of the classical sort operating at the axon/cellular level rather than any quantum scale.
Frankly the determined effort to assert that quantum mechanics must provide some as-yet-unknown explanation for things like free-will seems to be borne from the unshakeable yet essentially baseless notion that there is something called freewill that is neither compatible with determinism nor quantum randomness.
Quantum conciousness is a very contentious and not even those scientists pursuing it avidly would describe their views as the scientific consensus.
Perdie writes:
Some of this is caused by the tight clustering of neurons and the fact that the chenicals that cross synapses are not specifically directed, but some of it, I'm convinced, comes from quantum tunneling.
What convinces you of this?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 6 by Perdition, posted 02-02-2012 12:15 PM Perdition has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 9 by Dr Adequate, posted 02-02-2012 1:56 PM Straggler has not replied
 Message 11 by Perdition, posted 02-02-2012 4:18 PM Straggler has replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 9 of 359 (650730)
02-02-2012 1:56 PM
Reply to: Message 8 by Straggler
02-02-2012 1:45 PM


Re: will I dream?.......
Is there any evidence to suggest that the brain uses quantum superposition, tunnelling etc. to function?
No.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 8 by Straggler, posted 02-02-2012 1:45 PM Straggler has not replied

  
Straggler
Member (Idle past 314 days)
Posts: 10333
From: London England
Joined: 09-30-2006


Message 10 of 359 (650731)
02-02-2012 1:57 PM
Reply to: Message 5 by 1.61803
02-02-2012 11:16 AM


Re: will I dream?.......
This is the article I was thinking of:
Link writes:
Yes, if we play our cards right - or wrong, depending on your perspective.
In engineering terms, it is easy to see qualitative similarities between the human brain and the internet's complex network of nodes, as they both hold, process, recall and transmit information. "The internet behaves a fair bit like a mind," says Ben Goertzel, chair of the Artificial General Intelligence Research Institute, an organisation inevitably based in cyberspace. "It might already have a degree of consciousness".
Not that it will necessarily have the same kind of consciousness as humans: it is unlikely to be wondering who it is, for instance. To Francis Heylighen, who studies consciousness and artificial intelligence at the Free University of Brussels (VUB) in Belgium, consciousness is merely a system of mechanisms for making information processing more ...
Link
Unfortunately you have to pay for the rest via the New Scientist website. Unless anyone can find the full article for free?
Consider it an exercise in demonstrating your own sentience as superior to that of the internet.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by 1.61803, posted 02-02-2012 11:16 AM 1.61803 has seen this message but not replied

  
Perdition
Member (Idle past 3486 days)
Posts: 1593
From: Wisconsin
Joined: 05-15-2003


Message 11 of 359 (650761)
02-02-2012 4:18 PM
Reply to: Message 8 by Straggler
02-02-2012 1:45 PM


Re: will I dream?.......
Is there any evidence to suggest that the brain uses quantum superposition, tunnelling etc. to function? As far as I am aware there is no evidence that the brain is anything more than a chemical computer of the classical sort operating at the axon/cellular level rather than any quantum scale.
Is there any other electrical system where quantum effects are not present? They may not interfere much with the process, but they exist.
Frankly the determined effort to assert that quantum mechanics must provide some as-yet-unknown explanation for things like free-will seems to be borne from the unshakeable yet essentially baseless notion that there is something called freewill that is neither compatible with determinism nor quantum randomness.
I don't believe in free will. I'm a determinist. I'm just considering that electrons tunnel, full stop. It doesn't give free will, it only adds a probability rather than a strict determinism to a person's action. The probability may even be close to 100%, assuming that quantum effects are tiny, but I'm not going to rule them out completely as a method of affecting our actions.
What convinces you of this?
When a neuron releases the chemicals into a synapse between enurons, they're close to another neuron, and most will float over and cause that one to fire, but not all of them do. Some end up being reabsorbed by the initial neuron, and some end up hitting other neurons.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 8 by Straggler, posted 02-02-2012 1:45 PM Straggler has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 14 by Straggler, posted 02-03-2012 8:11 AM Perdition has replied

  
1.61803
Member (Idle past 1752 days)
Posts: 2928
From: Lone Star State USA
Joined: 02-19-2004


Message 12 of 359 (650777)
02-02-2012 5:52 PM
Reply to: Message 7 by Dr Adequate
02-02-2012 1:11 PM


Re: will I dream?.......
Well, this is untrue simply by definition. By definition, the compatibilist viewpoint is that one can have determinism and free will simultaneously
Yes, by strict definition you are correct.
Your right. I contend in any view, mine included free will poses a paradox that is not reconcilable.
Edited by 1.61803, : spelling

This message is a reply to:
 Message 7 by Dr Adequate, posted 02-02-2012 1:11 PM Dr Adequate has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 15 by Dr Adequate, posted 02-03-2012 8:42 AM 1.61803 has replied

  
Kairyu
Member
Posts: 162
From: netherlands
Joined: 06-23-2010


Message 13 of 359 (650805)
02-03-2012 5:13 AM


The order of things.
One important thing to know about free will... Absolute free will would mean we make every choice completely anew, without any influences. This is impossible of course.
What are the possible influences for our actions? I personally can only our intrinsic properties, outside influence as the cause of our actions. Anything else would amount to randomness.
The intrinsic properties are a important thing to note though. They limit our free will. We can't have intrinsic properties while having true free will to be anything we want. And it needs to be that way. Because intrinsic properties.. is our identity, our personality. Our way of making choices defines us as a person, makes us a individual. It's the natural order of things. And besides, it needs to be this way to make decisions properly. If we would decide every action completely unbiased, we would sit in the same place all day, stare, or get killed by animals. It's no way to live.

  
Straggler
Member (Idle past 314 days)
Posts: 10333
From: London England
Joined: 09-30-2006


Message 14 of 359 (650812)
02-03-2012 8:11 AM
Reply to: Message 11 by Perdition
02-02-2012 4:18 PM


Re: will I dream?.......
Perdition writes:
Is there any other electrical system where quantum effects are not present? They may not interfere much with the process, but they exist.
Well exactly. Quantum effects are always present but not always relevant. Quantum effects are absolutely fundamental to the semi-conductor devices that make up the internet but seem to have little relevance to the neurological workings of the human brain.
Yet you say you are convinced that quantum effects are responsible for human sentience but dismiss the notion that something like the internet could be sentient on the same quantum basis.
I still don't see what it is that convinces you of some quantum effect is responsible for human sentience. There seems to be no evidence for this at all.
Perdie writes:
I don't believe in free will. I'm a determinist.
Oh. OK. From the cheers you got I am guessing that others thought you were attempting to make a case for dualistic freewill on the "something quantum" basis. That is the route I thought you were starting down.
Perdie writes:
It doesn't give free will, it only adds a probability rather than a strict determinism to a person's action.
Indeed. Others advocating a "something quantum" as a basis for saving their notions of freewill should take note.
Perdie writes:
The probability may even be close to 100%, assuming that quantum effects are tiny, but I'm not going to rule them out completely as a method of affecting our actions.
Sure. But if it's still deterministic (albeit probabalistic) I am not sure how relevant that is here.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 11 by Perdition, posted 02-02-2012 4:18 PM Perdition has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 28 by Perdition, posted 02-03-2012 10:33 AM Straggler has replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


(2)
Message 15 of 359 (650814)
02-03-2012 8:42 AM
Reply to: Message 12 by 1.61803
02-02-2012 5:52 PM


Re: will I dream?.......
Your right. I contend in any view, mine included free will poses a paradox that is not reconcilable.
Well I seem to manage OK.
The way I look at it, my actions are determined, by the state of my brain, which is me, i.e. my actions are determined by me, which is what I mean by free will. Anyone asking for more "freedom" is in effect asking that their will should be so free that it's free of them, in which case it wouldn't be their will.
So I'm perfectly happy with compatibilism.
Edited by Dr Adequate, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 12 by 1.61803, posted 02-02-2012 5:52 PM 1.61803 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 16 by Straggler, posted 02-03-2012 8:50 AM Dr Adequate has replied
 Message 18 by 1.61803, posted 02-03-2012 9:17 AM Dr Adequate has replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024