Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,817 Year: 3,074/9,624 Month: 919/1,588 Week: 102/223 Day: 0/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Connecticut abolishes the Death penalty
Heathen
Member (Idle past 1284 days)
Posts: 1067
From: Brizzle
Joined: 09-20-2005


(1)
Message 1 of 205 (660454)
04-26-2012 4:29 AM


"Connecticut has become the 17th state in the US to abolish the death penalty.
Governor Dannel Malloy signed a bill in a low-key ceremony, after legislators voted earlier in April to end capital punishment for all future cases."
Connecticut abolishes the death penalty - BBC News
Personally I was a little shocked to see that Connecticut is only the 17th State to do this...
(Also, I've never noticed the silent 'c' in Connecticut before.. not sure I've ever had reason to type it before now.)
Do pro-death penalty folk believe that there will now be a surge in murder cases without this supposed "deterrent" in place?
Historically, has the abolition of the death penalty had any effect on murder/violent crime rates anywhere?

Replies to this message:
 Message 2 by Tangle, posted 04-26-2012 6:52 AM Heathen has not replied
 Message 10 by New Cat's Eye, posted 04-26-2012 11:08 AM Heathen has not replied
 Message 15 by onifre, posted 04-27-2012 8:21 AM Heathen has not replied

  
Tangle
Member
Posts: 9489
From: UK
Joined: 10-07-2011
Member Rating: 4.9


(1)
Message 2 of 205 (660456)
04-26-2012 6:52 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by Heathen
04-26-2012 4:29 AM


The deterrence argument does not work.
Amnesty USA have a good site for this info:
Death Penalty Facts – Amnesty International USA
Aside from the plain fact that it doesn't deter (for the obvious reasons that most murders aren't premeditated and those that are are done by people who do not believe they will be caught) it's also a revolting, inhuman and barbaric institution and not something the USA should be proud of itself for.
Oh, yes, as an afterthought; life imprisonment is cheaper:
"Using conservative rough projections, the Commission estimates the annual costs of the present system ($137 million per year), the present system after implementation of the reforms ... ($232.7 million per year) ... and a system which imposes a maximum penalty of lifetime incarceration instead of the death penalty ($11.5 million)."
--California Commission on the Fair Administration of Justice, July 1, 2008
Edited by Tangle, : No reason given.

Life, don't talk to me about life - Marvin the Paranoid Android

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Heathen, posted 04-26-2012 4:29 AM Heathen has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by NoNukes, posted 04-26-2012 7:11 AM Tangle has not replied
 Message 7 by vimesey, posted 04-26-2012 8:08 AM Tangle has not replied

  
NoNukes
Inactive Member


(1)
Message 3 of 205 (660458)
04-26-2012 7:11 AM
Reply to: Message 2 by Tangle
04-26-2012 6:52 AM


The deterrence argument does not work.
The deterrence argument has always been mere smoke and mirrors. Capital punishment has always been justified on the basis of appeals to more base instincts of humans. It is about revenge, and a distorted, barbaric notion of what constitutes fairness. And only a few countries, most of whom we would not chose to emulate in any other way, engage in he practice.

Under a government which imprisons any unjustly, the true place for a just man is also in prison. Thoreau: Civil Disobedience (1846)
The apathy of the people is enough to make every statue leap from its pedestal and hasten the resurrection of the dead. William Lloyd Garrison

This message is a reply to:
 Message 2 by Tangle, posted 04-26-2012 6:52 AM Tangle has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 4 by caffeine, posted 04-26-2012 7:29 AM NoNukes has replied
 Message 29 by Jon, posted 04-28-2012 10:03 AM NoNukes has seen this message but not replied

  
caffeine
Member (Idle past 1025 days)
Posts: 1800
From: Prague, Czech Republic
Joined: 10-22-2008


Message 4 of 205 (660459)
04-26-2012 7:29 AM
Reply to: Message 3 by NoNukes
04-26-2012 7:11 AM


The deterrence argument has always been mere smoke and mirrors. Capital punishment has always been justified on the basis of appeals to more base instincts of humans. It is about revenge, and a distorted, barbaric notion of what constitutes fairness. And only a few countries, most of whom we would not chose to emulate in any other way, engage in he practice.
I think it's wrong to describe states which still keep the death penalty as 'only a few countries'. Certainly, if you look at Europe and the Americas, you see just Belarus and the USA sticking out like sore thumbs, but most African and Asian countries still technically have the death penalty. Looking at the UN member states, a little over half still have the death penalty as a legal punishment, even if they don't all use it in practice; while almost a quarter still use it as a regular punishment for ordinary crimes.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by NoNukes, posted 04-26-2012 7:11 AM NoNukes has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 5 by NoNukes, posted 04-26-2012 7:38 AM caffeine has not replied
 Message 6 by Heathen, posted 04-26-2012 7:42 AM caffeine has not replied

  
NoNukes
Inactive Member


Message 5 of 205 (660461)
04-26-2012 7:38 AM
Reply to: Message 4 by caffeine
04-26-2012 7:29 AM


I think it's wrong to describe states which still keep the death penalty as 'only a few countries'.
Point taken.
I think it's wrong to describe states which still keep the death penalty as 'only a few countries'.
I think we can exclude those states that don't actually use the death penalty from the count. The overwhelming majority of states don't execute people.
while almost a quarter still use it as a regular punishment for ordinary crimes.
And how many of those countries are ones we would consider models to follow in other respects.

Under a government which imprisons any unjustly, the true place for a just man is also in prison. Thoreau: Civil Disobedience (1846)
The apathy of the people is enough to make every statue leap from its pedestal and hasten the resurrection of the dead. William Lloyd Garrison

This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by caffeine, posted 04-26-2012 7:29 AM caffeine has not replied

  
Heathen
Member (Idle past 1284 days)
Posts: 1067
From: Brizzle
Joined: 09-20-2005


Message 6 of 205 (660463)
04-26-2012 7:42 AM
Reply to: Message 4 by caffeine
04-26-2012 7:29 AM


Looking at the UN member states, a little over half still have the death penalty as a legal punishment, even if they don't all use it in practice
Ireland, My home country, Had the death penalty on the statutes right up until 1990, but in reality it was never used with the last execution in 1954. It was finally removed from the constitution in 2002. It cannot be reintroduced.
I guess there are many countries where this happens, i.e. it's still available as a punishment, but rarely, if ever used.
Capital punishment in Ireland - Wikipedia

This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by caffeine, posted 04-26-2012 7:29 AM caffeine has not replied

  
vimesey
Member
Posts: 1398
From: Birmingham, England
Joined: 09-21-2011


Message 7 of 205 (660466)
04-26-2012 8:08 AM
Reply to: Message 2 by Tangle
04-26-2012 6:52 AM


The biggest problem with the statistics on deterrence (which indicate very strongly (as per the graph which Tangle has put up) that capital punishment is ineffective as a deterrent), is that the statistics are counter-intuitive.
This site enjoys an abundance of debates, where counter-intuitive reality has met a brick wall of "common sense", and the data generally make little impact on that brick wall.
I think that if we are to make more headway in abandoning old, barbaric punishments, and in encouraging more states like Connecticut to abolish capital punishment, then the battleground has to be our schools. I took part in two debates on the death penalty when I was a kid, and as I recall, the teachers were excellent in allowing the debate to flow, and not guide it too strongly. And we came to the conclusion that the death penalty was unjustified.
It won't happen that way every time of course, but younger minds are more open minds, and I would welcome debates on the death penalty being added to every school's curriculum.
(Of course, the proponents of the death penalty will recognise the danger here, and fight any such thinking, claiming that a liberal agenda is seeking to influence their children's minds, but hey, it's good to dream)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 2 by Tangle, posted 04-26-2012 6:52 AM Tangle has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 8 by Heathen, posted 04-26-2012 9:21 AM vimesey has replied

  
Heathen
Member (Idle past 1284 days)
Posts: 1067
From: Brizzle
Joined: 09-20-2005


Message 8 of 205 (660477)
04-26-2012 9:21 AM
Reply to: Message 7 by vimesey
04-26-2012 8:08 AM


Of course, the proponents of the death penalty will recognise the danger here, and fight any such thinking, claiming that a liberal agenda is seeking to influence their children's minds, but hey, it's good to dream
I was kinda fishing for a pro-deather to explain why they think abolition of the death penalty is a bad thing.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 7 by vimesey, posted 04-26-2012 8:08 AM vimesey has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 9 by vimesey, posted 04-26-2012 9:24 AM Heathen has not replied

  
vimesey
Member
Posts: 1398
From: Birmingham, England
Joined: 09-21-2011


Message 9 of 205 (660478)
04-26-2012 9:24 AM
Reply to: Message 8 by Heathen
04-26-2012 9:21 AM


I don't know how good that kind of fishing is 'round these here parts

This message is a reply to:
 Message 8 by Heathen, posted 04-26-2012 9:21 AM Heathen has not replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 10 of 205 (660488)
04-26-2012 11:08 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by Heathen
04-26-2012 4:29 AM


Do pro-death penalty folk believe that there will now be a surge in murder cases without this supposed "deterrent" in place?
I don't think I've ever met anybody who was pro-death penatly.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Heathen, posted 04-26-2012 4:29 AM Heathen has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 11 by Rahvin, posted 04-26-2012 1:39 PM New Cat's Eye has replied
 Message 12 by Tangle, posted 04-26-2012 2:04 PM New Cat's Eye has seen this message but not replied
 Message 14 by caffeine, posted 04-27-2012 3:40 AM New Cat's Eye has seen this message but not replied

  
Rahvin
Member
Posts: 4032
Joined: 07-01-2005
Member Rating: 9.2


(3)
Message 11 of 205 (660514)
04-26-2012 1:39 PM
Reply to: Message 10 by New Cat's Eye
04-26-2012 11:08 AM


I don't think I've ever met anybody who was pro-death penatly.
I have.
They're typically extremely resistant to any form of argument. There are a few Ive spoken to who have, upon direct questioning, replied that there is no possible evidence or argument that would ever dissuade them from their support of the death penalty. For them, it's about what the accused "deserves," not about the effect such an action may or may not have in society. They literally consider execution in a bubble - this guy killed somebody, so we're going to kill him back, because he deserves it. It has nothing to do with deterrence, they don't particularly care about the potential to execute innocent people, and the relative cost isn't a concern (a frequent response is "just stop letting them appeal so much, and then it won't be so expensive to execute them"), it's an emotionally-charged question of vengeance.
It's frustrating to see someone so determined to end another human life for absolutely no reason other than a vindictive streak.

The human understanding when it has once adopted an opinion (either as being the received opinion or as being agreeable to itself) draws all things else to support and agree with it.
- Francis Bacon
"There are two novels that can change a bookish fourteen-year old's life: The Lord of the Rings and Atlas Shrugged. One is a childish fantasy that often engenders a lifelong obsession with its unbelievable heroes, leading to an emotionally stunted, socially crippled adulthood, unable to deal with the real world. The other, of course, involves orcs." - John Rogers
A world that can be explained even with bad reasons is a familiar world. But, on the other hand, in a universe suddenly divested of illusions and lights, man feels an alien, a stranger. His exile is without remedy since he is deprived of the memory of a lost home or the hope of a promised land. This divorce between man and his life, the actor and his setting, is properly the feeling of absurdity. — Albert Camus
"...the pious hope that by combining numerous little turds of
variously tainted data, one can obtain a valuable result; but in fact, the
outcome is merely a larger than average pile of shit." Barash, David 1995.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 10 by New Cat's Eye, posted 04-26-2012 11:08 AM New Cat's Eye has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 16 by vimesey, posted 04-27-2012 8:31 AM Rahvin has not replied
 Message 17 by onifre, posted 04-27-2012 8:32 AM Rahvin has replied
 Message 107 by New Cat's Eye, posted 04-30-2012 2:30 PM Rahvin has replied

  
Tangle
Member
Posts: 9489
From: UK
Joined: 10-07-2011
Member Rating: 4.9


Message 12 of 205 (660516)
04-26-2012 2:04 PM
Reply to: Message 10 by New Cat's Eye
04-26-2012 11:08 AM


It seems to be something fundamental Christians are often fond of. I've never worked that one out - wwjd? is apparently an invalid question. All very old testament.

Life, don't talk to me about life - Marvin the Paranoid Android

This message is a reply to:
 Message 10 by New Cat's Eye, posted 04-26-2012 11:08 AM New Cat's Eye has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 13 by Heathen, posted 04-27-2012 3:21 AM Tangle has not replied
 Message 30 by GDR, posted 04-28-2012 12:12 PM Tangle has not replied

  
Heathen
Member (Idle past 1284 days)
Posts: 1067
From: Brizzle
Joined: 09-20-2005


Message 13 of 205 (660558)
04-27-2012 3:21 AM
Reply to: Message 12 by Tangle
04-26-2012 2:04 PM


Exodus 23:25 would seem to give biblical justification..
"then thou shalt give life for life, 24Eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot, 25Burning for burning, wound for wound, stripe for stripe. "

This message is a reply to:
 Message 12 by Tangle, posted 04-26-2012 2:04 PM Tangle has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 171 by ramoss, posted 05-03-2012 11:14 PM Heathen has not replied
 Message 204 by ramoss, posted 06-07-2012 6:28 PM Heathen has not replied

  
caffeine
Member (Idle past 1025 days)
Posts: 1800
From: Prague, Czech Republic
Joined: 10-22-2008


Message 14 of 205 (660559)
04-27-2012 3:40 AM
Reply to: Message 10 by New Cat's Eye
04-26-2012 11:08 AM


I don't think I've ever met anybody who was pro-death penatly.
It's not exactly an uncommon viewpoint. Gallup's opinion polls have shown a majority in favour of the death penalty in the US every time tney've asked since 1971. Even then, it was 49% in favour with only 40% opposed (the rest being 'Don't knows' I suppose). The last time a Gallup poll found more opposed to the death penalty than in favour was 1966. And, just to be quite clear, 'the last time', also means 'the only time'. Every other poll all the back to 1936 when they started asking shows more in favour than opposed to the use of the death penalty.
I would stake everything I own for any odds that you have met plenty of people who were pro-death penalty. You just don't discuss the death penalty with most people you meet.
An interesting addition I noticed just now going through Gallup's polling data. In some polls, they also asked people whether they thought the death penalty was a deterrent. In all polls, less people said they thought it was an effective deterrent than supported it's use. In recent polls, the figure is about half. It seems that, for many, it really is about retribution, not deterrence.
One last point - this isn't something unique to Americans. The most recent opinion poll I found from the UK, here in abolitionist Europe, has 51% in favour and 37% to the death penalty for ordinary murder. Support is higher if you ask specifically about murdering children, or murder with rape. A widely discussed poll in Poland a couple of years ago had 63% in favour of the death penalty (if I remember right, there had been a recent big case in the news about some teenage murderer getting off lightly, which I'm sure affects results).

This message is a reply to:
 Message 10 by New Cat's Eye, posted 04-26-2012 11:08 AM New Cat's Eye has seen this message but not replied

  
onifre
Member (Idle past 2951 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


(1)
Message 15 of 205 (660578)
04-27-2012 8:21 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by Heathen
04-26-2012 4:29 AM


Do pro-death penalty folk believe that there will now be a surge in murder cases without this supposed "deterrent" in place?
I'm pro-death penalty. But not because it's a deterrent. It just seems like the right amount of justice in certain circumstances.
There's no reason for people like Bundy, Gacy, Dahmer to live. They are quite literally monsters that should be put to death. What's the point of keeping them alive, in a jail cell?
Some people need to fucking die, and I feel all states should have a system of putting them to death.
- Oni

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Heathen, posted 04-26-2012 4:29 AM Heathen has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 18 by vimesey, posted 04-27-2012 8:37 AM onifre has replied
 Message 108 by New Cat's Eye, posted 04-30-2012 2:35 PM onifre has replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024