Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 78 (8896 total)
Current session began: 
Page Loaded: 03-25-2019 2:27 AM
18 online now:
Dredge, Pressie (2 members, 16 visitors)
Chatting now:  Chat room empty
Newest Member: WookieeB
Post Volume:
Total: 848,629 Year: 3,666/19,786 Month: 661/1,087 Week: 30/221 Day: 1/29 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
1
23456
...
9Next
Author Topic:   Specific reasons for not seeing when a theory becomes obsolete
celestialGyoud
Member
Posts: 554
From: Roraima Peak
Joined: 02-11-2004


Message 1 of 128 (701373)
06-04-2013 8:55 PM


Average of years without multiplying: 4,750 per 5,000
*

Hi,

It is about ascertaining whether the Human body did or did not originate naturally or by natural causes. The Evolution theory, in regards to the origin of the Human body, looks really bad because its proposal to populations growth is proven to be an extremely serious error. It is proven to be mathematically inconsistent.

*

Quotes from Spotlight: How to Entangle a Juridical Panthera,

Evidence of Simultaneity consists in the fact that 42 linguistic ethnic groups did not spread to Europe during the time proposed by the Evolutionary theory ( for Human Origins ) otherwise Europe would be one miscegenated people even before they could become 42 Linguistic Ethnic groups. That the sets of groups were brought to the land simultaneously, all at one time, is the only possibility that was not proved wrong.

On the other hand the presence of skeletons of mammal specimens that became extinct doesn’t prove that they evolved. Observation shows that whenever mammal specimens disappear they cease from existing for becoming extinct.

There is a disconnection of time and place which is verified from the incompatibility between the consequences of having Humans on Europe for a time no longer than 14,000 years and the time proposed for their multiplication by the Evolutionary theory. It will be seen that all things the Humans have done to the place called Earth during a single season of 7,000 years; they would have done the same thing anyway during any of three seasons of 14,000 years that immediately precede the recent 7 thousand years.

The concept that the size of the Human brain would be product of natural selection becomes archaic and obsolete by Four different means,

‘Math proof of the Population Growth Models’, 'Evidence of Simultaneity - Previous Non-miscegenation of the European population', 'Impossibility of creating a beginning of life outside of what is already living' and ‘Physical proof that results from Genesis Experiment’.

In EVOLUTION VERSUS EMANATION OF LIVING LIGHT ( ENERGY ), from page 14th to 17th, and the subtitle ‘The shortest distance between two points: Simultaneity’ it will be seen that by ‘Emanation of living energy’ one ascertains that ELYON is a place where the life energy emanates of itself,

which confirms that in fragments of ‘Genesis as originally written’ there is no ‘creation by god or elohim’. It is verified in Labyrinth of hidden words that the original meaning of the Hebrew word EL ( ELYON ) has nothing to do with elohim or god ( generic terms and common designation for deities ).

-

The transcription ‘Understanding of times and relativity of simultaneity’ clears up: ‘Life energy and existence never had a beginning. Because no beginning of life is found outside of what is already living.’

*

Population Growth over the hills and far away

50 thousand years ago . . . . . . . 2,000 people . . . . . . .Many is a word
49 thousand years ago . . . . . . . ? . . . . . . . that only leaves you guessin’
43 thousand years ago . . . . . . . ? . . . . . . . Guessin’ bout a thing
35 thousand years ago . . . . . . . 2,000 people . . . ( one really ought not to lie )
25 thousand years ago . . . . . . . ? . . . . . . . . You really ought to know

*

For some reason, not shown by the Evolutionary theory for Human origins, the Human population in Europe would not increase until 35 thousand years ago, according to the Evolutionary theory. However, that there were no families of Humans multiplying on the Earth 25,000 years ago is evident, due to the fact that all things the Humans have done to the place called Earth during a single cluster of 7 thousand years, they would have done the same thing anyway during any of three sequences of 14 thousand years that immediately precede the recent 7,000 years.

-

1st cluster of 14,000 years – from 49 to 36,000 years ago: population x 15 - 80 %
2nd cluster of 14,000 years – from 35 to 22,000 years ago
3rd cluster of 14,000 years – from 21 to 7,000 years ago

Population growth Model: Thin Red Line

Multiplication rate: 1 to 15 people - 80 % per every thousand years.
Only the Fifth part survives: 4 from every 5 inhabitants do not multiply. It's a model that reproduces the chaos, a state of miserability and very bad conditions to population increase. Eighty percent of Humans were terminated or died because of wars, famines, diseases and other events and they've left no descendants.

1st cluster of 14,000 – From 49,000 years ago. World population: 2,000
1 thousand years | . . . . . . . . 2,000 x 15 = 30,000 - 80 % = 6,000 people
2 thousand years | . . . . . . . . 6,000 x 15 = 90,000 - 80 % = 18,000 p
3 thousand years | . . . . . . . 18,000 x 15 = 270,000 - 80 % = 54,000 p
4 thousand years | . . . . . . . 54,000 x 15 = 810,000 - 80 % = 162,000 p
5 thousand years | . . . . . . 162,000 x 15 = 2,430,000 - 80 % = 486,000 p
6 thousand years | . . . . . . 486,000 x 15 = 7,290,000 - 80 % = 1,458,000 p
7 thousand years | . . . . 1,458,000 x 15 = 21,870,000 - 80 % = 4,374,000 p
8 thousand years | . . . . 4,374,000 x 15 = 65,610,000 - 80 % = 13,122,000 p
9 thousand years | . . . 13,122,000 x 15 = 196,830,000 - 80 % = 39,366,000 p
10 thousand years | . . 39,366,000 x 15 = 590,490,000 - 80 % = 118,098,000 p
11 thousand years | . 118,098,000 x 15 = 1,771,470,000 - 80 % = 354,294,000 p
12 thousand years | . 354,294,000 x 15 = 5,314,410,000 - 80 % = 1,062,882,000 p
13 thousand years | 1,062,882,000 x 15 = 15,943,230,000 - 80 % = 3,188,646,000 p
14 thousand years | 3,188,646,000 x 15 = 47,829,690,000 - 80 % = 9,565,938,000 p

-

Evolutionary theory implies that the miscegenation in Europe would have started when they were 2,000 people. However, 2,000 people in Europe do not become 42 different linguistic ethnic groups through the means of miscegenation.

1st cluster of 14,000 years – from 49 to 36,000 years ago
2nd cluster of 14,000 years – from 35 to 22,000 years ago
3rd cluster of 14,000 years – from 21 to 7,000 years ago

This is heading for the open road that many men can't see.
There is a disconnection of time and place: incompatibility between the consequences of having Humans on Europe for a time no longer than 14 thousand years, and the time proposed for their multiplication by the Evolutionary theory.

Population growth Model: Beyond the thin red line

1st cluster of 14,000 – From 49,000 years ago. World population: 2,000

1 thousand years | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,000 x 10 = 20,000 - 80 % = 4,000 people
2 thousand years | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,000 x 10 = 40,000 - 80 % = 8,000 p
3 thousand years | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,000 x 10 = 80,000 - 80 % = 16,000 p
4 thousand years | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16,000 x 10 = 160,000 - 80 % = 32,000 p
5 thousand years | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32,000 x 10 = 320,000 - 80 % = 64,000 p
6 thousand years | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64,000 x 10 = 640,000 - 80 % = 128,000 p
7 thousand years | . . . . . . . . . . . . . 128,000 x 10 = 1,280,000 - 80 % = 256,000 p
8 thousand years | . . . . . . . . . . . . . 256,000 x 10 = 2,560,000 - 80 % = 512,000 p
9 thousand years | . . . . . . . . . . . . 512,000 x 10 = 5,120,000 - 80 % = 1,024,000 p
10 thousand years | . . . . . . . . . . 1,024,000 x 10 = 10,240,000 - 80 % = 2,048,000 p
11 thousand years | . . . . . . . . . . 2,048,000 x 10 = 20,480,000 - 80 % = 4,096,000 p
12 thousand years | . . . . . . . . . . 4,096,000 x 10 = 40,960,000 - 80 % = 8,192,000 p
13 thousand years | . . . . . . . . . 8,192,000 x 10 = 81,920,000 - 80 % = 16,384,000 p
14 thousand years | . . . . . . . 16,384,000 x 10 = 163,840,000 - 80 % = 32,768,000 p

Population x 10 - 80 % is surpasses far beyond the thin red line in terms of miserability and very bad conditions to multiply. It’s got what it takes to make a wind of change become a twister to the concepts wherever they've been told what to teach by the man.

Because real life always confirmed that it’s impossible that 2,000 people in Europe would have taken a time longer than ten thousand years to reach 1 million. But you know there is a rank of what matters more, regardless of a mistake on progress.

Specific reasons why not see when a theory becomes archaic and obsolete:
1st Sponsorships and financial support to Universities ought not to be lost. 2nd The Institutes’ reputation ought not to be damaged. 3rd The sales of many books must continue without damages. 4th As teacher on Human origins you must keep your job.

SIGN OF ANOMALY

....... Year | World Population in Millions
70,000 BC | <0.015
10,000 BC | 1

Often when a chronological basis is omitted with a jump, jumping from 70 directly to 10 then a debt with the truth can be seen, unfinished business that needs to be answered in response for a lack of consistency in the Evolutionary theory and the statement that the size of your brain is product of natural selection. When a theory states that it would have taken a time longer than 55,000 years to reach 1 million people, it implies that the number of children would remain the same from the beginning to the end of every 4,750 years per every 5,000 years interval.

Many, many men can’t see the open road to new possibilities of the real science ( ascertained truth of the facts ). When providing you meaningless numbers, or when giving you any number that has to do with many, that is the same as to say that ’25 thousand years ago you would find many people living in Europe’. And many is a word that only leaves you guessing about a thing you really ought to know. One really ought not to lie or drift on numbers as if man is a beast, and as if everything that happens in life is a disgrace.

-

DIAGNOSING THE PROBLEM

The Surrealist Intervals’ anomaly

The following was based on numbers proposed by the Evolutionary theory:

55 thousand years ago: 2,000 x 10 = 20,000 - 90 % = 2,000 people
50 thousand years ago: 1,700 x 10 = 17,000 - 90 % = 1,700 p
45 thousand years ago: 2,500 x 10 = 25,000 - 90 % = 2,500 p
40 thousand years ago: 3,500 x 10 = 35,000 - 90 % = 3,500 p
35 thousand years ago: 5,000 x 10 = 50,000 - 90 % = 5,000 p

The finals ( the totals ) can be changed and they still indicate global termination occurring from a thousand years to another. ♯ ♯ ♯ – Anomaly has been found – Every 5,000 years the number of children would be the same from the beginning to the end of every 4,750 years interval. Another anomaly is not seeing it.

During the 5,000 years intervals, from 55 to 35 thousand years ago, the time that the population would multiply on a regular basis equates to 250 years.

Average of years without multiplying: 4,750 years per every 5,000 years.

See through this point of view:

________________________________ 5,000 years interval ______________________________
|___________ p x 10 - 90 % ________|_______ multiplication rate _____________|
|_______________ 4,750 years ___________|_______ regular basis: 250 years __________|

That is why the problem is not about a constant decrease allegedly caused by a variety of factors which do not explain the lack of consistency in the Evolutionary theory. The anomaly is the impossibility that their population reductions could have happened in a measure that corresponds to 4,750 years without multiplying, per every 5,000 years. Because Human beings do multiply according to a regular basis which was not taken into consideration when the time proposed for their multiplication had been given by the Evolutionary theory.

Brief Summarized Signature

Real life Vs too pessimistic archeological surrealism

As certain as Die Hard, a pet kangaroo rat, has always an ace in the sleeve, ( whether the kangaroo rat bluffs or not ), it's only with a chronological basis that equates to 4,750 years without multiplying per every 5,000 years, that it would be possible for people in Europe to have taken 25 thousand years to reach 1 million.

If the number of children would be the same from the beginning to the end of every 4,750 years interval within the rows of 5,000 years from 55 to 35,000 years ago then there's still the option of stop drifting on numbers as if man is a beast, and as if everything that happens in life is a disgrace. That kind of chronological basis surpasses far beyond Hardy Har Har, a depressed, gloomy pessimistic hyena, always saying, 'I just know it's all going to go wrong'.

In Human Origins the ascertained truth of the facts has been constantly synthesized to an excessive and over exaggerated dependence on farming activity since it wasn't a fundamental condition for Humans to grow and multiply but just one of the options they chose. Let’s not talk about farming and agricultural technology as if 55,000 families of European fishermen, who never chose to do anything different, would depend so much on changing their fishing into agricultural activities so that they continued to grow and multiply.

For this reason many graphs that are made as alleged evidence of accuracy of the Evolutionary theory for Human origins do not show numbers of fishermen as they do with farming since fishermen in Europe could increase from 1,000 to 50,000 people in the least per every thousand years. Time for seeing beyond the spoon: The more children a farmer had, the more labor force was available for them to increase the production of the farm. Given the lack of technology in those days, the population growth was a solution and not a problem.

Observation shows that when Humans spread to a territory, this fact does not originate groups of different languages and ethnies. To the contrary, it brings miscegenation and then causes some languages and ethnies to disappear. That the sets of groups did not spread to Europe during the time proposed for their multiplication by the Evolutionary theory, is that which is ascertained by elimination.

According to Echoes in the words ‘No one called us to the land’, the appearance of these sets of groups in Europe occurred simultaneously. There is still the open road to new discoveries: That 42 different Linguistic Ethnic groups were previously selected by intelligent designer is the only possibility that was not proved wrong. That is why, by elimination, you ascertain they were brought to the land all at one time, otherwise Europe would be one miscegenated people.

Albanians Crimean Tatars Germanic people Portuguese
Armenians Croats Greeks Romanians
Aromanians Czech Hungarians Russian
Basques Dutch Igbo people Scottish
Belarusians Estonian Irish people Slovenes
Ethnic groups in Belgium Finnish Italians Spanish people
Bosniaks French Latvians Swedes
British people Gaelic Lithuanians Swiss
Bulgarians Georgians Macedonian Turks
Celts German people Netherlands Ukrainians
Cossacks Polish

Source: Wikipedia, European Ethnic group Templates

Europe isn't so large that it could originate so much different languages and ethnies through the miscegenation, the mixing involved in the Evolutionary theory. All of non-Russian Europe fits into the map of Brazil where the language became one. Evolutionary theory implies that the miscegenation in Europe would have taken place for a time longer than 25,000 years. Turning back to real European life, people take a walk and in awhile they are spread all over the hills and far away.

EVOLUTION VERSUS EMANATION OF LIVING ENERGY

If they should say to you: 'From whence have you come?' say to them: 'We have come from the Light, from the place where the light emanates of itself, arises and appears in our image.' If someone says to you: 'Who are you?' say: 'We are first-fruits of the living Light.' If they should ask you: 'What sign of living Light is in you?' tell them: 'It is a movement and yet motionless.' In the living word ( glittering with lightning through the density of the clouds ) was the life, and the life was the light of man. The life energy was the light of the Human body.

Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : Completeness in the Paragraph 7

Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : update

Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : update

Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : it becomes archaic indeed

Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : update

Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : update

Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : title update

Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : update

Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : Quotes from Spotlight: How to Entangle a Juridical Panthera


Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by Admin, posted 06-06-2013 8:42 AM celestialGyoud has responded
 Message 24 by ringo, posted 06-21-2013 1:29 PM celestialGyoud has not yet responded
 Message 25 by dwise1, posted 06-21-2013 2:40 PM celestialGyoud has not yet responded
 Message 35 by RAZD, posted 07-02-2013 2:57 PM celestialGyoud has responded
 Message 100 by TheMatrix/DNA, posted 08-29-2015 5:46 AM celestialGyoud has not yet responded
 Message 109 by Davidjay, posted 04-05-2017 8:44 AM celestialGyoud has not yet responded

    
celestialGyoud
Member
Posts: 554
From: Roraima Peak
Joined: 02-11-2004


Message 2 of 128 (701374)
06-05-2013 10:03 PM


Providing the Ultimate Rank of what matters more
-

quote:
-

But you know there is a rank of what matters more. It’s up to you to stop a mistake on progress, and tell people why not see when a theory becomes obsolete,

-

1st Sponsorships and financial support to Universities ought not to be lost. 2nd Institutes’ reputation ought not to be damaged. 3rd The sales of many books must continue without damages. 4th As teacher on Human origins you must keep your job.

-

SIGN OF ANOMALY

……. Year | World Population in Millions

70,000 BC | <0.015

10,000 BC | 1

-


-


    
Admin
Director
Posts: 12579
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.9


Message 3 of 128 (701375)
06-06-2013 8:42 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by celestialGyoud
06-04-2013 8:55 PM


Hi CrazyDiamond7,

I only read the first few paragraphs of your thread proposal. While other moderators might feel differently, it looks pretty crazy to me. If you can respond to this message with a brief description of around a hundred words of what you'd like to discuss, and if it doesn't sound too crazy, then I might give your thread proposal a read.

About this writing entitled Written on the outside and Sealed Within, we can't have a discussion of writings where only you have a copy. Did you write this yourself? Can you post it on the web somewhere?

Your second post only reinforced an impression of incoherency.


--Percy
EvC Forum Director

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by celestialGyoud, posted 06-04-2013 8:55 PM celestialGyoud has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 4 by celestialGyoud, posted 06-07-2013 1:57 PM Admin has responded

    
celestialGyoud
Member
Posts: 554
From: Roraima Peak
Joined: 02-11-2004


Message 4 of 128 (701376)
06-07-2013 1:57 PM
Reply to: Message 3 by Admin
06-06-2013 8:42 AM


Seeing the open road to a third option
-

Hi Admin Percy,

That which is being proposed, and the good point about promoting this thread, is give people a chance to speak with words, rather than just 11 dislike icons, by posting the firm reasons why the statements in the O.P. would be wrong.

Let's discuss, for example, the point from the transcription that says: ‘Life energy and existence never had a beginning. Because no beginning of life is found outside of what is already living.’

Because the fundamental essence of what is being declared makes sense to a lot of people, that is, the impossibility of 'life being formed ( or having a beginning ) outside of what is already living'

( But the evolution theory, in regards to the beginning of life, might disagree and state otherwise ),

The beginning of life according to evolution theory implies that it is possible for you to create life outside of what is already living since it would have naturally occurred, allegedly, according to many men. However, no results of such experiment were demonstrated indeed. Don’t you wonder,

If even man, with all perfection, intelligence and resources, was not able to produce the results to that experiment ( of creating a beginning of life outside of what’s already living; which would prove the accuracy of evolution theory )
then is it not too obvious that nature does not do it all by itself ?

That is why there is a third option which is neither creation by the god or elohim and its doctrine of miserability and hypocrisy,
nor evolution and its hidden implication of an alleged beginning of life which would have taken place outside of what is already living.

For who ever start to see the open road to new possibilities, considering a third option doesn’t sound crazy.

-

The writing mentioned in the first paragraph belongs to Elizabeth Tzshálem Beth.
( The rough translations are not the final English version )

For more info about 'Written on the outside and Sealed Within' the readers might send an E-mail to, 'sealedwithin -- then @ -- gmail.com'

-


This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by Admin, posted 06-06-2013 8:42 AM Admin has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 5 by Admin, posted 06-07-2013 4:12 PM celestialGyoud has responded

    
Admin
Director
Posts: 12579
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.9


Message 5 of 128 (701377)
06-07-2013 4:12 PM
Reply to: Message 4 by celestialGyoud
06-07-2013 1:57 PM


Re: Seeing the open road to a third option
CD, please post something I can understand that makes sense. This isn't a negotiation. If I don't understand it I won't promote it.

--Percy
EvC Forum Director

This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by celestialGyoud, posted 06-07-2013 1:57 PM celestialGyoud has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 6 by celestialGyoud, posted 06-08-2013 11:02 PM Admin has responded

    
celestialGyoud
Member
Posts: 554
From: Roraima Peak
Joined: 02-11-2004


Message 6 of 128 (701378)
06-08-2013 11:02 PM
Reply to: Message 5 by Admin
06-07-2013 4:12 PM


Re: Seeing the open road to a third option
-

quote:
Life energy and existence never had a beginning. Because no beginning of life is found outside of what is already living.

-

Admin Percy, the above statement is about the impossibility of life having had a beginning outside of what is already living'.

But a theory [ the evolution theory ] is fundamentally based on the belief that it would have been possible.

Many men have the habit of believing that the beginning of life would have started somewhere in the past, and then life would have evolved from that point.

But if it was so then it would be possible for you to create life outside of what is already living.

That is, man should be able to reproduce, by experiment, the exact conditions in which life would have started all by itself for the first time since that beginning of life would have happened naturally somewhere in the past ( according to the evolution theory ).

However, no results of such experiment were demonstrated indeed.

Have you ever wondered,

If even man with all perfection, intelligence and resources, was not able to create a beginning of life outside of what’s already living

( which would prove the inerrancy of the fundamental basis of the evolution theory )

then is it not too obvious that nature does not do it all by itself ?

-

That is why there is a third option: EMANATION OF LIVING LIGHT ( ENERGY ), which has nothing to do with 'life being created by the god or elohim.

-

Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : update

Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : update


This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by Admin, posted 06-07-2013 4:12 PM Admin has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 7 by Admin, posted 06-09-2013 9:22 AM celestialGyoud has responded

    
Admin
Director
Posts: 12579
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.9


Message 7 of 128 (701379)
06-09-2013 9:22 AM
Reply to: Message 6 by celestialGyoud
06-08-2013 11:02 PM


Re: Seeing the open road to a third option
CrazyDiamond7 writes:

That is why there is a third option: EMANATION OF LIVING LIGHT (ENERGY), which has nothing to do with 'life being created by the god or elohim.

Could you supply the evidence for the existence of the "emanation of living light"?


--Percy
EvC Forum Director

This message is a reply to:
 Message 6 by celestialGyoud, posted 06-08-2013 11:02 PM celestialGyoud has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 8 by celestialGyoud, posted 06-09-2013 12:06 PM Admin has responded

    
celestialGyoud
Member
Posts: 554
From: Roraima Peak
Joined: 02-11-2004


Message 8 of 128 (701380)
06-09-2013 12:06 PM
Reply to: Message 7 by Admin
06-09-2013 9:22 AM


Re: Seeing the open road to a third option
-

As it was quoted before, there is energy in living things and it is in two forms, chemical and electrical energy.

Physical evidence that the Human body is product of Emanation of Living Energy,
is the presence of simultaneity of that same Light or energy which moves as in a fading effect, in the Human brain,
also described as 'a movement and yet motionless'.

Because the permanence ( or duration of time ) of that movement is a simultaneous sequence, having nothing to do with continuous sequence of a second after another.

By relativity of simultaneity, that's what Einstein and other physicians have been telling you, 'There is another sequence of time which is time in simultaneous sequence. There is a time other than the continuous sequence of a second after another. The duration of a time interval between two events is not equal for all observers. It’s equal for inertial observers only.'

Knowing that time in simultaneous sequence is a permanence or duration of a time other than the continuous sequence of a second after another, life energy does echo in the nervous system and in the Human brain with the simultaneity required to produce your thoughts, imagination and knowledge.

To move in simultaneous sequence is a movement and yet motionless. You can see that same simultaneity when a lightning walks in heaven during a sequence of time that is not a continuous sequence. And as the duration of the time interval between two events is continuous for inertial observers only, even so the sequence of time of a non-inertial nervous quickening ( or trembling ) is simultaneous with the Initial time of life energy.

Another evidence that the Human body is product of Emanation of Living Light ( Energy ), and a sign of living Light in the Human body, is the physical result from the Genesis Experiment.

-

Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : update

Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : update

Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : No reason given.

Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : update


This message is a reply to:
 Message 7 by Admin, posted 06-09-2013 9:22 AM Admin has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 9 by Admin, posted 06-10-2013 9:01 AM celestialGyoud has responded

    
Admin
Director
Posts: 12579
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.9


Message 9 of 128 (701381)
06-10-2013 9:01 AM
Reply to: Message 8 by celestialGyoud
06-09-2013 12:06 PM


Re: Seeing the open road to a third option
CrazyDiamond7 writes:

Physical evidence that the Human body is product of Emanation of Living Energy, is the presence of simultaneity of that same Light or energy which moves as in a fading effect, in the Human brain, also described as 'a movement and yet motionless'.

This is nonsense. If you have no evidence for "the emanation of living light" then please stop wasting my time.


--Percy
EvC Forum Director

This message is a reply to:
 Message 8 by celestialGyoud, posted 06-09-2013 12:06 PM celestialGyoud has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 10 by celestialGyoud, posted 06-10-2013 6:28 PM Admin has responded

    
celestialGyoud
Member
Posts: 554
From: Roraima Peak
Joined: 02-11-2004


Message 10 of 128 (701382)
06-10-2013 6:28 PM
Reply to: Message 9 by Admin
06-10-2013 9:01 AM


Re: Seeing the open road to a third option
-

If there is no Sign of Living Light ( Energy; spirit ) emanating in you then the hardware ( the Human body ) and the software ( the Light or spirit ) that is you, would be one same thing. And would that light not be a darkness ?

When the body becomes a corpse then where does the living energy go ?

It returns to the source of life energy. However, when that person is forced to abandon the respective corpse; If there is no emanation of living Light then how could that Light ( life energy or spirit ) go anywhere ?

If there is no emanation of living Light then both ( the hardware; the corpse and the software; the life energy ) would be one same thing becoming even more darkness and dust of the ground.

-

And what about the Genesis experiment, which is a recipe to physical immortality,

If a person eats nothing else than the compatible fruits,
will that person experiment death by old age ?

-

Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : update

Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : update


This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by Admin, posted 06-10-2013 9:01 AM Admin has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 11 by Admin, posted 06-11-2013 8:48 AM celestialGyoud has responded

    
Admin
Director
Posts: 12579
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.9


Message 11 of 128 (701383)
06-11-2013 8:48 AM
Reply to: Message 10 by celestialGyoud
06-10-2013 6:28 PM


Re: Seeing the open road to a third option
If you want this in the science forums, then you need to offer some tangible evidence of this living light or living energy.

When the body becomes a corpse then where does the living energy go?

If "living energy" exists then there must be a means of detecting it. Where is the "living energy" measurement device? Where are the records of experiments that trace the path of living energy out of the body and on to its destination after death?

In other words, where is the evidence that this isn't just all in your imagination.


--Percy
EvC Forum Director

This message is a reply to:
 Message 10 by celestialGyoud, posted 06-10-2013 6:28 PM celestialGyoud has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 12 by celestialGyoud, posted 06-12-2013 6:04 PM Admin has responded

    
celestialGyoud
Member
Posts: 554
From: Roraima Peak
Joined: 02-11-2004


Message 12 of 128 (701384)
06-12-2013 6:04 PM
Reply to: Message 11 by Admin
06-11-2013 8:48 AM


Re: Seeing the open road to a third option
-

quote:
If "living energy" exists then there must be a means of detecting it.

The results from the Experiment based on the first instruction of Genesis would prove, by elimination,
that the Human body is not a product of natural selection. I'd recommend this in the Free For All forum since the 'Emanation of living Light' is a subject about new possibilities. A third option is like a road that is still to be seen and explored.

The above experiment would prove that Human body does not die of natural causes – For a body that was made out of the dust of the earth, and formed with the same nutrient properties that nurture all plants of the earth, it is not proper to digest dead flesh and incompatible food.

In order for a living flesh to digest the dead flesh it is necessary the production of a strong gastric juice which requires a gradual decomposition of living substances that are intrinsically and specifically human.

Therefore it is not natural or by natural causes when the death could be avoided by nourishing the Human body solely with fruits, the ones from compatible solid trees. That is, the death by old age can be avoided when one abstains from digesting incompatible foods.

-

Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : update


This message is a reply to:
 Message 11 by Admin, posted 06-11-2013 8:48 AM Admin has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 13 by Admin, posted 06-12-2013 8:39 PM celestialGyoud has responded

    
Admin
Director
Posts: 12579
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.9


Message 13 of 128 (701385)
06-12-2013 8:39 PM
Reply to: Message 12 by celestialGyoud
06-12-2013 6:04 PM


Re: Seeing the open road to a third option
If you can describe the Genesis Experiment maybe it would help get this promoted. No promises.

--Percy
EvC Forum Director

This message is a reply to:
 Message 12 by celestialGyoud, posted 06-12-2013 6:04 PM celestialGyoud has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 14 by celestialGyoud, posted 06-17-2013 4:41 PM Admin has acknowledged this reply

    
celestialGyoud
Member
Posts: 554
From: Roraima Peak
Joined: 02-11-2004


Message 14 of 128 (701386)
06-17-2013 4:41 PM
Reply to: Message 13 by Admin
06-12-2013 8:39 PM


Re: Seeing the open road to a third option
-

Here is a brief description of the Directives for the experiment, in the subtitle 'Initiate the Immortality' ( From: Written on the outside and Sealed Within ),

Experiment: To nourish the Human body solely with fruits,
Only the compatible ones from solid trees
Time to complete reduction of intragastric acidity: 25 days
Time to re-initiate the *stability of the nervous system: 49 days

* The term stability implies that the nervous system is deemed unstable ( from day 1st to 42nd ) in the measure that a person would often be hungry for incompatible foods.

Immortality is initiated when the Human body is nourished only with fruits, specifically the compatible ones from solid trees. That keeps the medulla oblongata and the brain as new and the body free from the effects of the aging process.

When one abstains from digesting incompatible foods then all nutrient substances that are intrinsically Human, such as calcium, hormones and proteins, do not need at any moment to be set apart and decomposed for the production of the precise type of gastric juice that is required to digest dead flesh and regular food.

You can freely eat fruits from solid trees except one ( the fruit from the olive tree ).

The term solid trees makes distinction between actual trees and plants that are palm-trees or trees that do not endure 7 years in the least. - Samples of fruits from compatible solid trees: Morinda Citrifolia, Orange, Avocado, Fig, Peach, Persimmon and Jabuticaba. For sweetener: crystal sugar or honey.

The tree of life in real time – Morinda Citrifolia is the only solid tree that flowers and bare fruits twelve times a year, yielding her fruit every month. When the green fruit of the tree of life becomes scintillate white, then it is still without smell and a person has approximately three days to get it eaten. After three days then the Morinda fruit begins to liquefy and it suddenly disintegrates with a strong smell. Therefore this fruit was not made for trade. It was made specifically for nourishment when the fruit is scintillating white and without smell.

Morinda - Principal elements found: Calcium, Proteins, Fiber, Iron and Zinc.

Ultimate cause of death by old age – The Human body was designed and made out of the same nutrients found in the dust of the earth. You are what you eat. And if a person will continually digest the same type of nutrients with which the Human body was formed then that is what the body tends gradually to become: dust of the earth. Who ever sees that the Genesis experiment is for real has the option of not doing that gradual fall, by eating solely compatible nutrients that were designed specifically to keep the body free from death and diseases.

From the dust of the earth – The nutrients of incompatible food come from the dust of the ground.

From the solid trees – Nutrients of compatible fruits do not come from the dust of the ground. They are filtered essences produced by the solid tree itself. The extension of her trunk is made up of millions of little bitty tubes that do filter and separate the nutrients out. On this, the fruit of the solid tree is a nutrient property given exclusively by the tree.

From the fruits of the solid trees you can freely eat, however, you can not eat the fruit of the tree of knowledge of good and evil ( e.g.: the fruit of the olive tree and olive oil ) for whenever you eat from it you will be ( gradually ) dying.

The above directive is about possibility in regards to the limit of the body: it is not possible to eat incompatible food and, at the same time, not be doing a gradual fall to the dust of the ground.

The word from the Initial Time does not speak about a law that can be broken nor a line that can be trespassed. It is about an extreme limit one can not go further. If it was possible to go beyond the line then who ever trespassed it would not die. Indeed the words that initiate, as originally written in the book of the ancients, have nothing to do with giving an order or commandment since orders are forgotten and commandments can be constantly broken.

-

Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : update


This message is a reply to:
 Message 13 by Admin, posted 06-12-2013 8:39 PM Admin has acknowledged this reply

    
Admin
Director
Posts: 12579
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.9


Message 15 of 128 (701388)
06-18-2013 8:13 AM


Thread Copied from Proposed New Topics Forum
Thread copied here from the Why not see when a theory becomes obsolete thread in the Proposed New Topics forum.
Replies to this message:
 Message 18 by Tangle, posted 06-18-2013 9:45 AM Admin has acknowledged this reply

    
1
23456
...
9Next
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2019