Message 1 of 98 (720574) 02-25-2014 7:35 AM

About 4000 years ago God told Abraham to circumcise himself and his male descendants. This practice is still done by Jews and Arabs, all descendants of Abraham, while also some others have adopted this practice.

And it turns out that this Biblical command is literally a life saver, which has in the last decades saved many millions of lives, by preventing evil diseases, amongst them deadly ones like AIDS.

More than 40 studies have shown that circumcised males have a strongly reduced chance for AIDS infection, and in countries where AIDS is rampant, for instance Africa, and where people have to live of less than $2 a day, and AIDS medication costs between $10 and more than $30 a day, there AIDS is a death sentence.

And since male circumcision prevents the majority of AIDS infections, therefore it is a mega-life saver:

"A preliminary analysis by Halperin and Malcolm Potts, MD, PhD, Bixby Professor of Population and Family Planning at the UC Berkeley School of Public Health, estimates that the practice of male circumcision has so far prevented at least 8 million HIV infections in the 15 African and Asian countries cited in the editorial review alone."

And it not only strongly reduces the chances of AIDS, but also of penile cancer, prostate cancer, cancer of the cervix by the partner of the circumcised man, and more.

For the finer details look HERE

So we see that the divine laws from the Torah a literally life savers, like it is written:

"Take to heart all the words I have solemnly declared to you this day, so that you may command your children to obey carefully all the words of this law. 47 They are not just idle words for you—they are your life. By them you will live long in the land you are crossing the Jordan to possess.”
Deut 32

Message 2 of 98 (720575) 02-25-2014 8:44 AM

Reply to: Message 1 by Eliyahu 02-25-2014 7:35 AM

Which way do you wish to present this topic?

Message 3 of 98 (720576) 02-25-2014 8:50 AM

Reply to: Message 2 by AdminPhat 02-25-2014 8:44 AM

Interesting question.

Let's put it in "is it science?"

Message 4 of 98 (720577) 02-25-2014 9:07 AM

Reply to: Message 3 by Eliyahu 02-25-2014 8:50 AM

I was intrigued by your link, Science is a method, not a position

Lets see if you can support the idea of circumcision from an entirely scientific perspective. It should be rather easy.

Message 5 of 98 (720578) 02-25-2014 9:08 AM

Edited by AdminPhat, : oops

Message 6 of 98 (720579) 02-25-2014 9:08 AM

Edited by AdminPhat, : No reason given.

Message 8 of 98 (720584) 02-25-2014 9:26 AM

(Or AIDS for that matter.)

Message 12 of 98 (720596) 02-25-2014 10:26 AM

Reply to: Message 10 by Theodoric 02-25-2014 10:00 AM

Apparantly it was humans who did the hacking. From a scientific perspective, we could readily question the intelligence of a Creator(assuming One exists) but in order to do so all that we can do is speculate philosophically.

One could philosophize that there are some aspects of the creative process that are left for humans to work. Hypothetically, if God created everything finished, we humans would have nothing to do.

Hypothetically, a Creator, should one exist, would not necessarily have to create finished products. Humans are a prime example. Were it so that we were created as finished or perfect, there would be no need to think, explore, discover, and/or solve anything.

It makes more sense that circumcision, apart from being a mere religious ritual, was also symbolic of humans "cleaning up" a part of their body that could harbor disease or uncleanness. (Not that humans knew the activity of bacteria at that time)

Message 13 of 98 (720597) 02-25-2014 10:30 AM

Reply to: Message 11 by Heathen 02-25-2014 10:12 AM

Actually, all you have to do is believe that reality isn't real, and all problems fade away. Makes you wonder why someone would worry about AIDS or foreskins at all.

Unless, or course, reality really is real, and someone would actually quite like it if real science really solved his real problems ;-)

Message 14 of 98 (720598) 02-25-2014 10:30 AM

Reply to: Message 1 by Eliyahu 02-25-2014 7:35 AM

Well, no. That's not how it happened.

You see, at some point in the past nobody did circumcisions at all. Most people wouldn't think of taking a knife to their own bits. It understandably seemed counterproductive by the common sense of the era.

Then, with no modern medicine, lots of deaths occurred. And many of those deaths were obviously caused by infection in the penis region. They could see this because of all the dead bodies with horrific looking, diseased penises (penii?).

So, then someone had the bright idea of cutting off the extra skin around the penis so that it wouldn't collect all the disease so easily. I think he did it on his little brother, first... but I could be mistaken.
Or, maybe someone had an accident that caused such a thing and it was discovered without forethought, even.

Kind of like how Svyatoslav Fyodorov discovered radial keratotomy (eventually leading to laser eye surgery)

quote:

---

In 1974, Svyatoslav Fyodorov removed glass from the eye of a boy who had been in an accident. The boy, who required eyeglasses for correction of myopia caused by astigmatism, fell off his bicycle. His glasses shattered on impact, and glass particles lodged in both eyes. To save the boy's vision, Fyodorov performed an operation which consisted of making numerous radial incisions extending from the pupil to the periphery of the cornea in a radial pattern like the spokes of a wheel. After the glass was removed by this method and the cornea healed, Fyodorov found that the boy's visual acuity had improved significantly.

---

Eventually, it became obvious that cutting off the extra skin from the penis made it easier to stay healthy and away from disease.

Then, some folks wrote it down in a book and called it circumcision.
But, because it had been so many hundreds of years since they started the practice, they forgot how it all started.
To them, it seemed difficult to imagine that someone would hurt themselves in such a way on purpose... so they just said exactly what you're saying today: "God did it."

Made sense then... not so much now.

Message 15 of 98 (720600) 02-25-2014 10:39 AM

Reply to: Message 12 by Phat 02-25-2014 10:26 AM

God's a bloke, right? No way would he have got the design of the dick wrong. (And so small...)

So he invented hacking off bits of dick as a passtime? He's worse than Satan.