Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 63 (9072 total)
216 online now:
AZPaul3, nwr, Tanypteryx (3 members, 213 visitors)
Newest Member: FossilDiscovery
Post Volume: Total: 893,145 Year: 4,257/6,534 Month: 471/900 Week: 177/150 Day: 23/8 Hour: 1/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Life - an Unequivicol Definition
AlphaOmegakid
Member (Idle past 2109 days)
Posts: 564
From: The city of God
Joined: 06-25-2008


Message 1 of 2 (772312)
11-12-2015 10:32 AM


It has always amazed me that a science field like Biology is so comfortable with so many definitions which are equivocal. (Life, Evolution, Species...) But that's just the way it is. Biology is the study of life, but biologists can't agree on a definition of life. In every text book that addresses this subject, they are all quite comfortable in stating that there is no unequivocal definition of life and they usually spend a significant effort in "proving" why we can't come up with an unequivocal definition.

I suspect this indoctrination has led most Biologists to give up on the definition. But not me! I believe it is possible to create an unequivocal, simple definition of biological life or for simplicity sake an organism. I have created this definition over a period of years, and it has been tested by a number of personally know scientists.

So here it is:

Life, or a living organism is a self contained entity which uses ATP (adenosine triphosphate) for metabolism and synthesizes ATP with enzymes which are synthesized from a genetic process requiring the transfer of information from DNA to RNA.

This definition covers all known life. It is short, and unequivocal. It is minimal. And it is easily measured. It does not use abstract terms. It is, however quite different from all previous definitions that I have reviewed.

So, at a minimum, a cell must be self contained, must metabolize, and must be a "protein factory". That's a summary, and it is the minimum requirement of any known living thing. Certainly living things also can do much more that this, and this is why this definition is minimal.

So, there it is, let's see what your thoughts are?


Admin
Director
Posts: 12788
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.1


Message 2 of 2 (772317)
11-12-2015 11:39 AM


Thread Copied to Origin of Life Forum
Thread copied to the Life - an Unequivicol Definition thread in the Origin of Life forum, this copy of the thread has been closed.

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.1
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2022