Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 80 (9005 total)
36 online now:
AZPaul3, DrJones*, Hyroglyphx (3 members, 33 visitors)
Newest Member: kanthesh
Post Volume: Total: 881,196 Year: 12,944/23,288 Month: 669/1,527 Week: 108/240 Day: 7/29 Hour: 0/2

Announcements: Topic abandonment warning (read and/or suffer the consequences)


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Fox Claims and Predictions
Percy
Member
Posts: 19855
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 4.3


Message 1 of 4 (876488)
05-21-2020 7:07 AM


I check Google News once or twice a day just to get a feel for the top headlines, and it feels as if Fox News headlines are getting more play than they used to. I could easily be wrong about that, it's not like I've been keeping a daily tally, but their headlines do tend to stand out because of topic and claims. The topic is frequently someone the president either likes or hates, and the claims are usually somewhat extravagant or overblown. Another frequent headline is something Hannity or Ingraham or Pirro or Carlson said.

So I thought I'd start a thread about Fox claims and predictions so that I have a record of them and can keep track of which ones prove true and which ones don't.

--Percy


  
Percy
Member
Posts: 19855
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 4.3


Message 2 of 4 (876489)
05-21-2020 9:56 AM


Laura Ingraham reveals how Michael Flynn was 'targeted by Jim Comey's FBI'
I don't see how Laura Ingraham reveals how Michael Flynn was 'targeted by Jim Comey's FBI' is news. This is not the report of an investigative journalist who's uncovered information of how Comey targeted Flynn. It's just a report of what a Fox News talk show host speculated.

The story reports Ingrham saying, "We now know that 39 Obama aides submitted dozens of unmasking requests for calls that involved Flynn." This perpetuates the misperception that Flynn was targeted by Obama administration unmasking requests, when the reality is that the unmasking request is only made because the identity of the person is unknown. The unmasking request is made to find out who it is. A report refers to someone as "person-of-interest-1", and someone can make a request for the identify of "person-of-interest-1". Administrations make thousands of these requests every year.

The rest of the news article is incredibly thin gruel. Ingraham suspiciously wonders why no unmasking request for Flynn for the original FBI report on the Flynn phone call with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak was ever made, then after raising suspicions answers her own question by explaining that the report used Flynn's name, making an unmasking request totally unnecessary. Ingraham then goes on to cast suspicion on the FBI for using Flynn's actual name when this has already been explained as being because knowing Flynn's name and position were essential for understanding the report.

Ingraham states that Flynn was targetted by Comey's FBI.

She concludes by stating that Flynn had every right to talk to the Russian Ambassador. I'm no expert on that aspect of the law. Maybe he had that right as part of the incoming administration, maybe not, but I have a feeling that they don't have that right, at least not without giving the current administration some kind of heads up. There must be a strong desire that foreign governments not have two administrations to talk to independently in the days leading up to a transition from one administration to the next, and that that desire would be codified in law or regulation or at least in common practice.

But the key point is that Flynn wasn't charged with talking to the Russian Ambassador. He was charged with lying to the FBI about it, and he probably lied about it because it either wasn't legal or at least wasn't proper.

There are so many problems with this Fox report that it isn't even necessary to wait for the passage of time to assess it's truth or falsity. At minimum it's misleadingly intended to lend the impression that there was malfeasance on the part of Comey's FBI and the Obama administration in investigating Flynn.

--Percy

Edited by Percy, : Grammar.


  
nwr
Member
Posts: 5623
From: Geneva, Illinois
Joined: 08-08-2005


Message 3 of 4 (876513)
05-21-2020 2:32 PM


FOX is click bait
FOX has mastered the art of making click bait headlines.

In the meantime, I've been improving my skills at avoiding click bait.


Fundamentalism - the anti-American, anti-Christian branch of American Christianity

Replies to this message:
 Message 4 by Capt Stormfield, posted 05-21-2020 3:11 PM nwr has acknowledged this reply

  
Capt Stormfield
Member
Posts: 417
From: Vancouver Island
Joined: 01-17-2009


(2)
Message 4 of 4 (876518)
05-21-2020 3:11 PM
Reply to: Message 3 by nwr
05-21-2020 2:32 PM


Re: FOX is click bait
Fox headlines: Dog turds on the sidewalk of the news.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by nwr, posted 05-21-2020 2:32 PM nwr has acknowledged this reply

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2020