|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Review and Confirm The Mathematical Proof of God | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
KING IYK Member Posts: 61 Joined: |
I Bring Good News!!!
The Truth: The Mathematical Proof of The One True God: The Holy Trinity. Within this text is The Proof, beyond an ounce of doubt, by way of the language of the Universe: Mathematics, that The Triune God is The One True God and The Holy Bible is His Word. Home << Review and Confirm Proof Here.
Edited by KING IYK, .
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PaulK Member Posts: 18060 Joined: Member Rating: 5.0 |
Perhaps you would like to outline this so called “proof” here, so we have something to discuss which doesn’t rely on going to your website.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
KING IYK Member Posts: 61 Joined: |
It is a github page consisting of much needed diagrams for illustrations. The Proof illustrates how the trinity of numbers (e.g. 111, 222, 333), reveals the one true God in a consistent and coherent manner that is beyond doubt.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PaulK Member Posts: 18060 Joined: Member Rating: 5.0 |
quote: That’s well short of an outline. There’s not even a hint of how such a “proof” could possibly work.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
nwr Member Posts: 6490 From: Geneva, Illinois Joined: |
KING IYK writes in Message 1: The Truth: The Mathematical Proof of The One True God: The Holy Trinity. I see many assertions, but no actual proof of anything. You point to some patterns in the behavior of numbers. But you do not even offer a proof of the correctness of those patterns. By the way, those patterns are well known to mathematicians. But they don't say anything at all about God.Fundamentalism - the anti-American, anti-Christian branch of American Christianity
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Admin Director Posts: 13141 From: EvC Forum Joined: |
Thread moved here from the Coffee House forum.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Admin Director Posts: 13141 From: EvC Forum Joined: |
A topic like this belongs in the Faith and Belief forum, not the Coffee House forum. To have a topic appear in the Faith and Belief forum it must first be proposed in the Proposed New Topics forum, which is where I have moved this topic and where it is right now.
The Forum Guidelines state:
Summarizing the above, a proposal for a new topic should briefly describe the topic and outline the introductory points. Links should only be used for reference purposes. Using links to make your points for you should be strongly avoided, even when to your own website or webpage, and discussion via link is not done here. Please post another message that contains these elements. Once an acceptable topic proposal has been posted I will promote this topic.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
KING IYK Member Posts: 61 Joined: |
In 312 AD, The phrase "in hoc signo vinces"(By this sign you shall conquer) appeared in a vision to Roman emperor Constantine along with the sign of The cross.
Romans 5:6 reads "For while we were still weak, at the right TIME Christ died for the ungodly" Fixing the cross into a time(the ultimate creation) clock is the key to revealing The Truth. Nikola Tesla said “If you only knew the magnificence of the numbers 3, 6, and 9, then you would have a key to the universe.” Well, The Proof above provides the magnificence of those numbers. This is The Book with The Seven Seals. The Son of God could have died in a billion other ways but He came into this world specifically to die on a cross, crucified by the Romans. There is a reason for that. The cross is the representation of The Trinity. The digital root of all trinity of numbers(stated in the proof. e.g. 555, 777) is either 3,6,9. The sequence is eternal and exclusive to trinity of numbers. couple this with Romans 5:6 and The reason for fixing the cross into a time clock will be justified.All other segments of the proof are built on this and prove consistent. The Proof is not dependent upon our historical knowledge, nor is it dependent upon the thoughts of fallible Scholars. But rather, upon CONSISTENCY and The Word of God. It begins with the definition of The Holy Trinity: A single God existing as three identical entities.Then it proceeds to define the Trinity of Numbers: A single number existing as three identical entities. e.g. 111, 222, 333. Home << Within this text is The Proof,
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Admin Director Posts: 13141 From: EvC Forum Joined: |
If "The Proof" is what's important, then instead of pointing to a link you should present the proof in this thread, but there's no necessity that that happen in your initial post, so I'll promote this thread. Some members may follow your link anyway.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Admin Director Posts: 13141 From: EvC Forum Joined: |
Thread copied here from the Review and Confirm The Mathematical Proof of God thread in the Proposed New Topics forum.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PaulK Member Posts: 18060 Joined: Member Rating: 5.0 |
So, in other words it’s not a proof at all. And some of it is pretty silly. It is in no way surprising that 1 x 3 =3 or that 2 x 3 =6, for instance.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
KING IYK Member Posts: 61 Joined: |
The Proof does not only illustrate how numbers work but also why.
When a number is added to the Triune Number 9, the digital root of the number and the digital root of the sum remain the same. The order is maintained. The Proof explains why such a phenomenon is, 9 is the Triune number. Why don't you highlight the segments you think are silly? If they really are, that is.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Percy Member Posts: 23185 From: New Hampshire Joined: Member Rating: 5.7 |
KING IYK writes in Message 12: The Proof does not only illustrate how numbers work but also why. Could you explain "how numbers work but also why," and then explain how that ties in to mathematically proving God? --Percy Edited by Percy, : Fix typo.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PaulK Member Posts: 18060 Joined: Member Rating: 5.0
|
quote: It really doesn’t. And if you were any sort of a mathematician you could show how it really works (“why” is just a consequence of using base 10 notation as you should know)
quote: No, it does not.
quote: To be honest, that would be all of it.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
KING IYK Member Posts: 61 Joined: |
It should be noted that you are yet to provide reasons for why The Proof is incorrect.
It is easy to simply state "To be honest, that would be all of it." You should at least ponder on why the same 333, which was derived from the trinity of numbers (as illustrated in the proof), is also derived when the cross is fixed into the time clock. The Proof contains images that are crucial to its illustration and I dont think I could upload such images on here.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2025