Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,422 Year: 3,679/9,624 Month: 550/974 Week: 163/276 Day: 3/34 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Gene-family Comparisons
Saviourmachine
Member (Idle past 3575 days)
Posts: 113
From: Holland
Joined: 01-16-2004


Message 1 of 2 (313856)
05-20-2006 10:18 AM


Phylogenetic Metrics
There are a lot of ways to create phylogenetic trees (cladistics, fossil layer ordering e.g.). There are also several ways to create them, by using genetic material alone. Using Gene-family comparisons seems most trustworthy. The probability that the results of a study are coincidence, because only isolated mutations or only two species are compared, does decrease. Such Gene-family comparisons can have different metrics. Molecular phylogenetic techniques investigate:
  • Similarity between nucleotide sequences.
  • Distance between genes on the genome.
  • Similarity in degradation of genes to pseudogenes, and the way they degrade.
  • Similarity in synonymous and nonsynonymous* ratio divergences. (With this not only pseudogenes can be recognized, but they can be used IMHO as metric itself too.)
You are probably able to list many metrics more. If anyone possesses a comprehensive overview, I'd like to see it... This is however not exactly the content of this thread.
Mathematics
Mathematical tools are used to find for example the fewest steps to "come from" a certain nucleotide sequence "to" another. This is also interesting stuff (using Markov Models etc), but neither the topic of this discussion.
Question Background
The metrics I listed differ in their convincing abilities. The phenotype across species corresponds to a certain distribution of characteristics. It is likely to have a genetic code distribution that is likewise (also for someone that beliefs in "design", whatever that entails). However, metrics like the distance between genes are neutral in that regard. There is no functional reason to design the system like that. Moreover, metrics like the gene corruption to pseudogenes that show a similar distribution, are pretty convincing in this context. There is no reason whatever to design the system with that kind of corruption.
Question
My question is therefore: Do you know studies with gene families, or at least across several species, that investigate the correspondances in decay of genetic material?
Example: See especially table 1 in Human specific loss of olfactory receptor genes, Gilad et al.[PDF]
*involving mutations that change the amino acid for which the new codon codes

AdminNosy
Administrator
Posts: 4754
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Joined: 11-11-2003


Message 2 of 2 (313874)
05-20-2006 10:59 AM


Thread copied to the Gene-family Comparisons thread in the Biological Evolution forum, this copy of the thread has been closed.

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024