In another thread, Steve8 made the following claim:
Well, you may think they have been established...they sound like circular reasoning to me, based on assumptions that have yet to be proven...
It seems to me that following up on this claim would be off topic in the original thread, so I have started this one.
The "assumptions" Steve8 are reffering to are the facts of evolution. I would like to see Steve8 or anyone who agrees with him defend the position here. Show exactly how the reasoning of biology and evolution is circular.