Maxwell had noted that M. Faraday had searched in "vain" for something of the form in the words "absolute charge" but this was before the words "electron" and "proton" were more properly not much longer nominal. I am not saying yet what about infinity is contained in 'renomalization' that may be relevant to this denotation but the point for Maxwell was what was to be "thought outside the box" of demons of good and plenty etc etc. And if I am the Gibbs to Lewontin's Boltzmann then with or without Gould the cone is rather Pascal's no matter the collection Lebesque did not collect for reasons of Laplace or not. Gametic selection is easily enoug framed as so understood.
So it is NOT that Einstein or Bohr could such assert actually transmitted "charge" but rather the THOUGHT in anaology this time of repulsion for the actual attrraction (at distance or however the physics is writ) BETWEEN electricity and heat (I do not yet want to give in/to the investigation that pythons got constriction and heat transfer to eggs by eating e-fish ; including Lotka Voltera AS A PHASE OF MATTER as Wright indicated etc etc) but rather that the lineage link could be possible by an Actual Infinity Theory of Absolute Charge potentially vessilzed by DNA.
What Faraday sought in vain for may exist and DNA may not be the aperiodic :crystal: it was but IS an absolute charge bearer which in the process moves RNA. This is a non-milltary paid for or inspired notion of molecular mechanics of molecular biolgy.
What I said in orgin of this dynamics immediately below may not be topologically correct as to the source of force and the bood may possibly only define the LIMIT of the places where the enetering vs reenetering curves exist WITH RESPECT TO ABSOLUTE CHARGE in its actual quantum mechanical describaility.
Hope this helps to show that creativity in biological thought whether c oming from creationism or criticism of evolution can be approved of to be taught to the younger in the audience by Hoesch or not etc.
™ Version 4.2