Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 83 (8942 total)
28 online now:
14174dm, AZPaul3, DrJones*, Tanypteryx (4 members, 24 visitors)
Newest Member: John Sullivan
Post Volume: Total: 863,715 Year: 18,751/19,786 Month: 1,171/1,705 Week: 423/518 Day: 41/58 Hour: 0/8


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Ethics vs. Morals: do origins matter?
ReverendDG
Member (Idle past 2398 days)
Posts: 1119
From: Topeka,kansas
Joined: 06-06-2005


Message 1 of 2 (380913)
01-29-2007 11:48 AM


This is a rather tough topic to start out with but, i think i'm going to give it a shot as one of my next tries at a PNT

As I was looking at stile's topic on morality god or darwin topic, i thought about morality and ethics and what they really are, as well as what they mean.

My thoughts wandered to the validity of both of them when it comes to where they come from, do they matter to how people view them? Do morals have more meaning than ethics because of the supposed origins of them?

or do ethics have more validity, since they have more flexibity from thier origins?

My frame of mind when it comes to morals and ethics are this, morals come from the authority of something spiritual or supernatural in origin,while ethics come from human interaction and observation, from there to human reasoning.


"no intelligent agent who is strictly physical could have presided over the origin of the universe or the origin of life." - William Dembski

  
AdminNem
Inactive Member


Message 2 of 2 (380979)
01-29-2007 2:41 PM


Thread copied to the Ethics vs. Morals: do origins matter? thread in the Coffee House forum, this copy of the thread has been closed.

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2019