Gaia egg invalidates Darwinian macro-evolution. the vesica attractor

Gaia egg invalidates Darwinian macro-evolution.
This fossil form contains a matrix of environmental components consisting of oolites, cyanobactia and what appears to be a colonization of eukaryotes geometrically dispersed throughout the structure.{ this eukaryote micro-fossils structure needs to confirmed with a laboratory analysis}What I am stating is the individual phyla emerged separately and suddenly from attractors. The vesica attractors accounts for the higher taxon that appeared during the Cambrian. The simple multi-celled life are only related to the complex life in that the both emerged directly from a microbial substrate.To veiw image:Page not found - 404 Error DesignSkewThis message has been edited by metatron, 04-16-2005 06:01 PMThis message has been edited by metatron, 04-16-2005 10:31 PM

A quick Google search shows you've been spamming the web with this article, posting the exact same thing at every site. It appears there is more than enough discussion of your theories going on already.Another Admin may feel differently but I see no reason to add to the spam.

---

What veiws are allowed: creationism is being discussed on other web sites so is darwinism. why are you cencering mine and labeling it spam. Do you think I am selling something?

Well, you're selling your pet idea. Other Admins will take a look at your proposal I'm sure and if they disagree with me (which happens quite often) they will promote it.Here are a few suggestions that might help get it approved.First, shorten it by about half or more.Select one idea and present it clearly. Start with a single paragraph and outline your position. As the discussion proceeds, you can bring in additional points as needed.Provide links to photographs and independant analysis of the artifact you say you found. List the significant findings that are supported by the independant analysis.Finally, don't try to get around the promotion process by linking back to your PNT in other threads.

---

Ok, will do, thanks{Added subtitle, closed topic on 4/24/05 - Adminnemooseus}This message has been edited by Adminnemooseus, 04-24-2005 12:09 AM