Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 60 (9209 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: Skylink
Post Volume: Total: 919,462 Year: 6,719/9,624 Month: 59/238 Week: 59/22 Day: 14/12 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Expanding time?
Larni
Member (Idle past 107 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 1 of 143 (450731)
01-23-2008 12:28 PM


I've been doing a bit of reading into cosmology and it's pretty heavy going (being completly out of my field).
I've been reading about the big bang (please don't groan) and it seems to me that every thing is expanding (in terms of space/time): now, does it mean time as we experience time (with a directional arrow) is expanding, too?
Is this just some cock-eyed idea I've dreamt up by not grasping the maths and it's really a non-question or is time actually expanding in a measurable way (in the same way the expansion of space is taking place)?

Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by Larni, posted 01-24-2008 11:05 AM Larni has not replied
 Message 5 by Chiroptera, posted 01-24-2008 11:53 AM Larni has replied

  
Admin
Director
Posts: 13107
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002


Message 2 of 143 (450851)
01-24-2008 10:42 AM


Thread moved here from the Proposed New Topics forum.

  
Larni
Member (Idle past 107 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 3 of 143 (450852)
01-24-2008 11:05 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by Larni
01-23-2008 12:28 PM


I'm begining to think this is a non question (thanks Catholic Scientist!).
But if this does have merit as a question please chime in (especially if you know cosmology/physics).

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Larni, posted 01-23-2008 12:28 PM Larni has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 4 by New Cat's Eye, posted 01-24-2008 11:26 AM Larni has not replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 4 of 143 (450853)
01-24-2008 11:26 AM
Reply to: Message 3 by Larni
01-24-2008 11:05 AM


I'm begining to think this is a non question (thanks Catholic Scientist!).
You're welcome.
What I've read on the Big Bang is that the evidence suggests that space is expanding, not that spacetime is expanding.
But, could the way we experience time progressing, as a series of instinces, actually just be time "expanding" in a similiar way to that which space expands?
I dunno. The answer prolly comes down to the maths.
Edited by Catholic Scientist, : added "be"

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by Larni, posted 01-24-2008 11:05 AM Larni has not replied

  
Chiroptera
Inactive Member


Message 5 of 143 (450856)
01-24-2008 11:53 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by Larni
01-23-2008 12:28 PM


Space-time is not expanding. In General Relativistic models, space-time exists as a static 4-manifold. To an observer, space appears to be expanding, but that is an illusion created by the "motion" of the observor along her world-line -- that is, as time passes.
Consider this analogy: Space time is a 2-manifold, that is, the surface of a sphere. Like all of us, she can't help but experience time passing -- this is represented by her motion south along a line of longitude. Looking sideways is her experience of "space". So at a given point in time, she has moved down in latitude, and the latitude represents that time on her watch. A line of constant latitude is the spatial universe that she sees; that is, to her the universe is a circle.
Now, a little bit later, she is a little further south; now the circle of constant latitude is a large circle. To the observer, the universe is bigger; space has "expanded". But that is because her universe at any given time is a cross-section of a higher dimensional manifold, and at different times she is seeing different cross-sections.

Spare a thought for the stay-at-home voter;
His empty eyes gaze at strange beauty shows
And a parade of the gray suited grafters:
A choice of cancer or polio. -- The Rolling Stones

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Larni, posted 01-23-2008 12:28 PM Larni has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 6 by Larni, posted 01-24-2008 12:37 PM Chiroptera has not replied

  
Larni
Member (Idle past 107 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 6 of 143 (450858)
01-24-2008 12:37 PM
Reply to: Message 5 by Chiroptera
01-24-2008 11:53 AM


So if the sphere is expanding does the longitude time line 'change' as the relative curve of the sphere decreases? Or is that just a side effect of the analogy and not important?
I fully appreciate I may have totally missed the point of your example and may be taking it far too literally.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by Chiroptera, posted 01-24-2008 11:53 AM Chiroptera has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 7 by Modulous, posted 01-24-2008 12:39 PM Larni has not replied
 Message 8 by cavediver, posted 01-24-2008 12:55 PM Larni has not replied

  
Modulous
Member (Idle past 238 days)
Posts: 7801
From: Manchester, UK
Joined: 05-01-2005


Message 7 of 143 (450859)
01-24-2008 12:39 PM
Reply to: Message 6 by Larni
01-24-2008 12:37 PM


So if the sphere is expanding
The point is, the sphere is not expanding...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 6 by Larni, posted 01-24-2008 12:37 PM Larni has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 14 by johnfolton, posted 01-24-2008 3:34 PM Modulous has not replied

  
cavediver
Member (Idle past 3896 days)
Posts: 4129
From: UK
Joined: 06-16-2005


Message 8 of 143 (450861)
01-24-2008 12:55 PM
Reply to: Message 6 by Larni
01-24-2008 12:37 PM


So if the sphere is expanding does the longitude time line 'change' as the relative curve of the sphere decreases?
As Mod says, the sphere is not expanding. It is a fixed size. What is expanding are the circles of latitude, as you move up the lines of longitude from the South Pole, or down from the North Pole depending on your analogy preference. The circles of latitude represent space, and the lines of longitude are time.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 6 by Larni, posted 01-24-2008 12:37 PM Larni has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 9 by New Cat's Eye, posted 01-24-2008 1:00 PM cavediver has replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 9 of 143 (450864)
01-24-2008 1:00 PM
Reply to: Message 8 by cavediver
01-24-2008 12:55 PM


What is expanding are the circles of latitude
As the circles of latitude expand, does the magnitude of the time dimension get relatively smaller comapared to the magnitudes of the spacial dimensions? I mean, since the longitude line stays the same "size" as the latitude lines expand, is time shirinking relative to the expanding spacial dimensions?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 8 by cavediver, posted 01-24-2008 12:55 PM cavediver has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 10 by cavediver, posted 01-24-2008 1:05 PM New Cat's Eye has not replied
 Message 11 by Larni, posted 01-24-2008 1:38 PM New Cat's Eye has not replied

  
cavediver
Member (Idle past 3896 days)
Posts: 4129
From: UK
Joined: 06-16-2005


Message 10 of 143 (450865)
01-24-2008 1:05 PM
Reply to: Message 9 by New Cat's Eye
01-24-2008 1:00 PM


Yes, that's right. And when we put it this way, the time lines can actually shrink and expand, like the space dimensions, depending on the overall geometry/topology. We just don't think of it that way as we're tied to travelling along the time lines, and also the geometry of our own universe is quite boring and doesn't behave that way (think of the lines of longitude around the globe)
Edited by cavediver, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by New Cat's Eye, posted 01-24-2008 1:00 PM New Cat's Eye has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 12 by Larni, posted 01-24-2008 1:44 PM cavediver has not replied

  
Larni
Member (Idle past 107 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 11 of 143 (450868)
01-24-2008 1:38 PM
Reply to: Message 9 by New Cat's Eye
01-24-2008 1:00 PM


Catholic Scientist writes:
As the circles of latitude expand, does the magnitude of the time dimension get relatively smaller comapared to the magnitudes of the spacial dimensions? I mean, since the longitude line stays the same "size" as the latitude lines expand, is time shirinking relative to the expanding spacial dimensions?
Yes, that's exactly the reverse of what I was thinking!
But it is a 'change' in time relative to space.
Again you put my thoughts into better words than I ever could have.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by New Cat's Eye, posted 01-24-2008 1:00 PM New Cat's Eye has not replied

  
Larni
Member (Idle past 107 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 12 of 143 (450870)
01-24-2008 1:44 PM
Reply to: Message 10 by cavediver
01-24-2008 1:05 PM


Cavediver writes:
And when we put it this way, the time lines can actually shrink and expand, like the space dimensions, depending on the overall geometry/topology.
Ah, I see. We could never percieve it anyway. I've been thinking in a too fancifull way again, have'nt I?. A pox on this conventional universe.
I really must learn some more maths so I can stop having to use ananlogies.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 10 by cavediver, posted 01-24-2008 1:05 PM cavediver has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 13 by New Cat's Eye, posted 01-24-2008 2:00 PM Larni has not replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 13 of 143 (450874)
01-24-2008 2:00 PM
Reply to: Message 12 by Larni
01-24-2008 1:44 PM


Cavediver writes:
And when we put it this way, the time lines can actually shrink and expand, like the space dimensions, depending on the overall geometry/topology.
Ah, I see. We could never percieve it anyway.
Just use different analogies.
Think of the topology as that of a horn, like a tuba, instead of a sphere. That can help explain further expansion versus a "collapse" at the end.
And if you think of the topology as like a telescope, in the sense that it is telescopic (extendable), you can acually have the time deminsion expanding with the spacial dimensions.
You just gotta make sure the analogy conforms to what you are trying to perceive, keeping in mind the limitations of the analogy.
But for reality, it all depends on what he actual topology of the universe looks like. And I don't think that we have it totally nailed down yet, but cavediver can correct me if I'm wrong.
I really must learn some more maths so I can stop having to use ananlogies.
Yeah good luck with that one

This message is a reply to:
 Message 12 by Larni, posted 01-24-2008 1:44 PM Larni has not replied

  
johnfolton 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5844 days)
Posts: 2024
Joined: 12-04-2005


Message 14 of 143 (450886)
01-24-2008 3:34 PM
Reply to: Message 7 by Modulous
01-24-2008 12:39 PM


So if the sphere is expanding
The point is, the sphere is not expanding...
Are you saying that if we could have a superstring that could not be stretched connecting the galaxies the galaxies would prove to be not moving though space however it appears your all saying that its only space time that part of nothing that is being stretched by some force thats giving us the illusion that the galaxies have moved when its only space time between them that has stretched.
When your talking about the sphere are you talking about the entire universe. If the galaxies are not moving (the sphere not expanding) is the big bang theory dead?
Edited by johnfolton, : No reason given.
Edited by johnfolton, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 7 by Modulous, posted 01-24-2008 12:39 PM Modulous has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 15 by New Cat's Eye, posted 01-24-2008 4:06 PM johnfolton has replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 15 of 143 (450890)
01-24-2008 4:06 PM
Reply to: Message 14 by johnfolton
01-24-2008 3:34 PM


Are you saying that if we could have a superstring that could not be stretched connecting the galaxies the galaxies would prove to be not moving though space however it appears your all saying that its only space time that part of nothing that is being stretched by some force thats giving us the illusion that the galaxies have moved when its only space time between them that has stretched.
Huh?
Try using punctuation, proper spelling, and proper grammer...
Here, let me help:
quote:
Are you saying that if we could have a superstring, that could not be stretched, connecting the galaxies, then the galaxies would prove to be not moving though space? However, it appears you're all saying that its only space time, that part of nothing that is being stretched by some force, thats giving us the illusion that the galaxies have moved when its only space time between them that has stretched.
Is that closer to what youre trying to ask? Still, I'm having trouble understanding the question...
The galaxies are not flying through space away from each other, the distance between them is increasing because the spacial dimensions are expanding.
When your talking about the sphere are you talking about the entire universe. If the galaxies are not moving (the sphere not expanding) is the big bang theory dead?
The lititude lines, one dimension, represent all three spatial dimensions of the universe. The longitude line represents time.
As you move along the longitude line, the latitude lines become larger, and this represents the expanding of the spacial dimensions. The expansion that the sphere "sees" as you move along a longitude line represents the expansion of the universe but the sphere, itself, is not expanding like the balloon does in the balloon analogy.
That is the point of the point that the sphere, itself, is not getting any bigger.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 14 by johnfolton, posted 01-24-2008 3:34 PM johnfolton has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 16 by johnfolton, posted 01-24-2008 7:32 PM New Cat's Eye has not replied
 Message 56 by jaywill, posted 12-09-2008 4:46 AM New Cat's Eye has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024