Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,817 Year: 3,074/9,624 Month: 919/1,588 Week: 102/223 Day: 0/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Now this is interesting...
derwood
Member (Idle past 1876 days)
Posts: 1457
Joined: 12-27-2001


Message 1 of 3 (40067)
05-14-2003 10:02 AM


Looks like some of salty's heros have found some other admirers .
Scroll down to the posts on the Nature letters....

Replies to this message:
 Message 2 by Mammuthus, posted 05-14-2003 11:12 AM derwood has not replied
 Message 3 by Brad McFall, posted 05-14-2003 12:42 PM derwood has not replied

  
Mammuthus
Member (Idle past 6475 days)
Posts: 3085
From: Munich, Germany
Joined: 08-09-2002


Message 2 of 3 (40076)
05-14-2003 11:12 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by derwood
05-14-2003 10:02 AM


whoa!...that is a bit too similar to be by chance

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by derwood, posted 05-14-2003 10:02 AM derwood has not replied

  
Brad McFall
Member (Idle past 5033 days)
Posts: 3428
From: Ithaca,NY, USA
Joined: 12-20-2001


Message 3 of 3 (40087)
05-14-2003 12:42 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by derwood
05-14-2003 10:02 AM


How can we be both salt and earth?
SPLX-
I hope that captilizing your letters will may be garner from you (or others a read). I have *not* gotten deep enough to really see what your beloved"" STLY is up to here but the link here WAS to a topic I mentioned in a thread that mysteriously disappeared for a time when I had, or so I thought deftly used both words "confusion" and "conflict" to advantage this side of the Aced ball or so I thought I was about to. Instead and as you and Mammuthus both can be intelligent enough to know that if Creationism DOES NOT change the editorial policy at say NATURE then it will not be able to be but a toy video game to us more so I hope serious users of this and other sites.
Unfortunately I MUST report with respect to the linkage here to ID info that I HAVE COME TO THE CONCLUSION that underlying systematically (I would have thought it only a few regime changers with a bit too much subway for lunch)(THE CREATION AND EVOLUTION AS TWO AND NOT ONE)is a disebling agenda THAT IS NOT WHAT IS READ FROM THE PRIOR TO ELECTRONIC PRINT MEDIA of the same topic. This IS very disconcerting to me for I did not use the net in the early years as I was ACUTALLY DOING RESEARCH and had not time to chat, link, inform etc and yet in the subject of c/e WHICH IS NARROWER than Science Techonology and Society Studies the subversion has become so complete that people who WANT TO GET INFORMED CAN NOT because of the filtering that the few comets in our mists input which leaves one back to the standard print media in which case the insights that can be ADDITIONALLY gained in a communicable environment such as this left to a bit of DUST on.. you name it.
I am not saying one way or the other about whether ID info should or should not have been removed but the protestors"" "enjoyed" talking to the IDist and I myself in light of this rejection find I am becoming much the standard Creationist EVEN THOUGH THIS IS NOT WHAT I THOUGT WOULD BE THE VERY END RESULT. I only see this impass on the web possible if the science changes but the science wont change because the scientists dont want even the metaphyiscs of creationsm (ID etc) and if this (today's c/e look) is what the students get as an alternative NO ADVANCE is possible for SOCIETY. I have not heard anything post-war that changes even my feelings on this.
This is not the job of the government to change either. I hope this helps.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by derwood, posted 05-14-2003 10:02 AM derwood has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024