Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,874 Year: 4,131/9,624 Month: 1,002/974 Week: 329/286 Day: 50/40 Hour: 1/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Continuation of the "Ultimate Gift" Thread
Rrhain
Member
Posts: 6351
From: San Diego, CA, USA
Joined: 05-03-2003


Message 1 of 78 (65099)
11-08-2003 6:34 AM


messenjaH responds to me:
quote:
quote:
Try to remember: It has something to do with taking the other person's opinions into account and realizing that just because you think something doesn't mean it is true.
Exactly! Now only if you practice what you preach...
I do.
You will notice that I don't go around preaching to others who haven't asked for my opinion. When I give of my time and effort, I do it specifically to provide the assistance and not to shoehorn it into an opportunity to preach to people.
quote:
quote:
Incorrect. The student is there willingly. The student seeks out the teacher in order to learn something. The teacher does not exploit the suffering of the student: Listen to my spiel or you don't get any food.
Who asked you to "teach"?
Missionaries give food, clothes and medicine willingly,
In exchange for a captive audience to preach to.
So the people are given the choice between starvation/sickness or kowtowing to the "saviors."
It's called exploitation.
quote:
they don't FORCE anyone to do anything.
Oh, indeed. They can continue to starve if they want.
As Eddie Izzard said in his routine, "So my choice is 'or death'?"
quote:
They ask the recievers of goods, who are in need if they will listen once they are taken care of.
(*chuckle*)
You really are naive, aren't you?
quote:
You seem to think that missionaries make a deal of 'I give you food and you let me give you belief(s)'.
Bingo! You don't really think the missionaries don't do anything to prevent people from leaving, do you?
Oh, I'm not saying they shackle them to the tables. But just because you don't tie them down doesn't mean you aren't forcing the issue.
I'm currently reading Interesting Times by Terry Pratchett. It is set in the Agatean Empire, which is essentially Japan. The main character is told that all swords have been outlawed...and yet perfect order is maintained. "They've got something worse than whips." Complete subjugation and loyalty of the populace and no need to physically force anybody to do anything.
Coercion does not mean something out of A Clockwork Orange.
quote:
Your assuming things you know nothing of.
And you know this because of what, precisely?
Since you seem to know so much about my personal history, why don't you tell us what experience I have personally had with missionaries. Come on, this should be easy. You know so much about me.
quote:
God asked me to "teach".
Then teach god.
When Joe Binky asks you to teach him, then you can teach Joe Binky.
God telling you to teach Joe Binky doesn't count since god has no authority over Joe Binky. When you are to teach Joe Binky, Joe will let you know. Until then, keep working on your syllabus.
quote:
quote:
Mine takes your opinion into account. You don't even know of my existence unless you decide to be aware of it. You don't learn what my opinion is until you decide to be aware of it.
So does mine.
Incorrect.
"Here's a bowl of soup and have you heard the good news of our savior, Jesus Christ?"
Um...the person didn't come there for the good news. The person came there for the soup. What does Jesus Christ have to do with a bowl of soup?
When I go and provide food to the poor, I simply say, "Here you go." That's all I'm there to do: Provide food. If someone in the line thinks that he'd like to know what my personal opinions are about the supernatural (and why he would want to do that, I don't know), then I tell him that I'll be able to get back to him after I have finished with my shift.
So no, your position does not take the other person's opinion into account. If it did, rather than you asking them if they would like to hear the good news of Jesus Christ, you would ask them, "So tell me about your god."
Have you never heard of advertising? Tell me, which is the most altruistic act:
1) Providing support for an endeavor where every twelve-and-a-half minutes you interrupt the program to inform all the participants that you are the one supporting the endeavor.
2) Providing support for an endeavor where at the beginning and ending of the program, but not during the program, you inform all the participants that you are the one supporting the endeavor.
3) Providing support for an endeavor but never telling any of the participants that you are the one supporting the endeavor.
I'm reminded of a passage from the Bible about doing your good deeds in secret so as not to be like the Pharisees who crow about their actions so that they can gain glory from men.
quote:
I listen to what everyone has to say,
Irrelevant.
The question is not if you listen. The question is whether or not you speak up when you weren't asked.
Obviously, if someone asks you for your opinion, then by all means give it.
But if nobody asks you for your opinion, what makes you think it is appropriate for you to give it unbidden?
And on a related note, what makes you think that it is appropriate for your unbidden statement to be assumptions that they are in need of saving rather than asking them if they are in any sort of trouble?
You still haven't answered my question. This makes at least four times I have directly asked it of you. Is there a particular reason why you refuse to answer? I am not asking it for my health. I really want to know:
Suppose you were at the gym doing laps in the pool and somebody keeps pelting you with life preservers, trying to "save" you.
Is that someone being kind or is that someone being a pain in the ass?
quote:
quote:
And more importantly, my opinion doesn't declare that you are in a "lousy existence," are "worthless," or that you are going to "die and that's it."
If you are an atheist it does.
Excuse me? Since when did atheism mean "lousy existence"? When did atheism mean life is "worthless"? And when did atheism equate to a lack of spirituality? One does not need to belive in god in order to believe in a soul.
------------------
Rrhain
WWJD? JWRTFM!

Replies to this message:
 Message 2 by Brian, posted 11-08-2003 7:51 AM Rrhain has not replied
 Message 3 by Rrhain, posted 11-08-2003 8:02 AM Rrhain has not replied
 Message 4 by Trump won, posted 11-08-2003 9:04 AM Rrhain has replied
 Message 11 by Dr Jack, posted 11-10-2003 9:26 AM Rrhain has replied

Brian
Member (Idle past 4987 days)
Posts: 4659
From: Scotland
Joined: 10-22-2002


Message 2 of 78 (65110)
11-08-2003 7:51 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by Rrhain
11-08-2003 6:34 AM


HI Rrhain,
I would just like to support this part of your post.
"Here's a bowl of soup and have you heard the good news of our savior, Jesus Christ?"
Um...the person didn't come there for the good news. The person came there for the soup. What does Jesus Christ have to do with a bowl of soup?
Through my job I have been present at dozens of assemblies and classroom lessons when various schools I have taught at have had guest speakers who have been doing missionary work.
Invariably their presentations start off very well, they show footage of some villages full of starving people, widespread disease and very poor sanitation. The it cuts to a more recent view of the village, healthier looking population, perhaps a small medical centre and some fairly crude but effective sanitation.
Then, just when you start to have some admiration for the peope who have helped the villagers, the pay off is shown. The video now shows missionaries handing out Bibles, more often than not they hand out the New testament only, the vllagers have no idea what to do with the Bibles, but since the missionaries have been very kind to them, they hold on to the books anyway.
Then another cut-scene, the little school 'shack', with the kids singing Kumbaya my Lord!
I have to agree with you, there is no other way to describe this action other than by using the word Exploitation .
Thses people would sing and believe anything you wanted them to, they did not initially come to the missionaries to hear the word of God, they came to get food and clean water and the missionaries have grasped their opportunity to exploit these people, IMO it is a very despicable act.
Far more honourable are the people who help others with no strings attached.
Brian.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Rrhain, posted 11-08-2003 6:34 AM Rrhain has not replied

Rrhain
Member
Posts: 6351
From: San Diego, CA, USA
Joined: 05-03-2003


Message 3 of 78 (65111)
11-08-2003 8:02 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by Rrhain
11-08-2003 6:34 AM


Hmmm...my title seems to have been clipped. I guess you aren't allowed to use quotation marks in titles. It's supposed to be:
Continuation of the "Ultimate Gift" Thread
Could someone with privs rename this topic without the quotes?
------------------
Rrhain
WWJD? JWRTFM!
{Title fixed - AM}
[This message has been edited by Adminnemooseus, 11-08-2003]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Rrhain, posted 11-08-2003 6:34 AM Rrhain has not replied

Trump won 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1268 days)
Posts: 1928
Joined: 01-12-2004


Message 4 of 78 (65113)
11-08-2003 9:04 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by Rrhain
11-08-2003 6:34 AM


Well missionaries want to give others food and by their beliefs they are instructed to tell others about Jesus. I don't feel they are trying to exploit anyone, I mean they aren't forcing anyone to believe the things that they do. By assuming that the people that missionaries target to help do not have their own free will to or are not intelligent enough to believe what anyone tells them then you are saying these people are gullible and dumb. Christians wouldn't hold food back from anyone, you are depicting missionaries as bad people. I would be impressed if I saw a group of atheists travel around the world helping others who are in desperate need. Missionaries give medicine and food out and then they express their beliefs. And again noones forcing them to believe. See, there is a difference between what atheists are called to do and what christians are called to do. God says stand up for your beliefs, express them etc. More importantly when missionaries risk their lives in countries just to help others to survive these people must notice their kindness. Christians are supposed to be noticed by their actions not their words. I would ask "why are you people here helping us?" Our opinions differ and there is no way around it. But I wanted to clarify this accusation of "exploiting".
------------------
-chris

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Rrhain, posted 11-08-2003 6:34 AM Rrhain has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 5 by Prozacman, posted 11-08-2003 11:40 AM Trump won has not replied
 Message 6 by Rand Al'Thor, posted 11-08-2003 5:30 PM Trump won has replied
 Message 18 by Rrhain, posted 11-11-2003 9:25 AM Trump won has replied

Prozacman
Inactive Member


Message 5 of 78 (65127)
11-08-2003 11:40 AM
Reply to: Message 4 by Trump won
11-08-2003 9:04 AM


Well, it's sorta like this buddy; the starving villagers are saying, Thank Moombagooglecrom(their god) that you missionaries are coming to feed and shelter us and tell us about your god without killing us like you used to do way back in the middle ages if we didn't believe.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by Trump won, posted 11-08-2003 9:04 AM Trump won has not replied

Rand Al'Thor
Inactive Member


Message 6 of 78 (65177)
11-08-2003 5:30 PM
Reply to: Message 4 by Trump won
11-08-2003 9:04 AM


If you were starving and desperate for some food and some guy came to up and gave you food you would be grateful. And if that guy said that Bonngabomma God was responsible for the food wouldn't you feel slightly grateful to this Bonngabomma man? This is by definition exploitation. Taking advantage of the less fortunate in order to spread what you believe. If the missionaries really wanted to help people they would give them food and only speak about their personal beliefs if asked.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by Trump won, posted 11-08-2003 9:04 AM Trump won has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 7 by Trump won, posted 11-09-2003 1:43 PM Rand Al'Thor has not replied
 Message 14 by Loudmouth, posted 11-10-2003 6:35 PM Rand Al'Thor has not replied

Trump won 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1268 days)
Posts: 1928
Joined: 01-12-2004


Message 7 of 78 (65328)
11-09-2003 1:43 PM
Reply to: Message 6 by Rand Al'Thor
11-08-2003 5:30 PM


Ok, but christian missionaries DON'T do that.
------------------
-chris

This message is a reply to:
 Message 6 by Rand Al'Thor, posted 11-08-2003 5:30 PM Rand Al'Thor has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 8 by NosyNed, posted 11-09-2003 1:51 PM Trump won has replied
 Message 21 by Rrhain, posted 11-11-2003 9:35 AM Trump won has not replied

NosyNed
Member
Posts: 9004
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003


Message 8 of 78 (65330)
11-09-2003 1:51 PM
Reply to: Message 7 by Trump won
11-09-2003 1:43 PM


Maybe they to, maybe they don't. Maybe the do sometimes. Maybe they do it frequently.
What makes you made that statement? Do you know anything about what they do? I do know that the local salvation army likes to add a little "salvation" to it's food services. I've not seen it done to egregiously though.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 7 by Trump won, posted 11-09-2003 1:43 PM Trump won has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 9 by Trump won, posted 11-09-2003 1:57 PM NosyNed has replied

Trump won 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1268 days)
Posts: 1928
Joined: 01-12-2004


Message 9 of 78 (65335)
11-09-2003 1:57 PM
Reply to: Message 8 by NosyNed
11-09-2003 1:51 PM


If they are practicing what God instructs them to do they aren't. I mean yeah I can't speak for mssionaries as a whole but if they are doing what they are called to do correctly then yes.
------------------
-chris

This message is a reply to:
 Message 8 by NosyNed, posted 11-09-2003 1:51 PM NosyNed has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 10 by NosyNed, posted 11-09-2003 2:36 PM Trump won has replied

NosyNed
Member
Posts: 9004
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003


Message 10 of 78 (65343)
11-09-2003 2:36 PM
Reply to: Message 9 by Trump won
11-09-2003 1:57 PM


Odd, since I was under the strong impression that "spreading the word" was part of the instructions. You are now implying that that isn't the case.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by Trump won, posted 11-09-2003 1:57 PM Trump won has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 12 by Trump won, posted 11-10-2003 6:15 PM NosyNed has not replied

Dr Jack
Member
Posts: 3514
From: Immigrant in the land of Deutsch
Joined: 07-14-2003
Member Rating: 8.3


Message 11 of 78 (65547)
11-10-2003 9:26 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by Rrhain
11-08-2003 6:34 AM


I have a question.
Suppose our tribe of hypothetical natives treats women very much as second class citizens. I'll let you fill in the details with whatever cultural practices towards women you find most reprehensible. Now, suppose, our hypothetical aid workers turn up and provide food, water, shelter, education and sanitation to these natives. Materially improving their situation. Should these aid workers also act to improve the lot of the women? Should they provide education to the girls as well as the boys? Is it explotation to introduce our social convention of equal opportunities on the back of the material aid?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Rrhain, posted 11-08-2003 6:34 AM Rrhain has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 13 by Trump won, posted 11-10-2003 6:23 PM Dr Jack has not replied
 Message 22 by Rrhain, posted 11-11-2003 9:54 AM Dr Jack has replied

Trump won 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1268 days)
Posts: 1928
Joined: 01-12-2004


Message 12 of 78 (65628)
11-10-2003 6:15 PM
Reply to: Message 10 by NosyNed
11-09-2003 2:36 PM


Spreading the word is, "exploiting" isn't.
------------------
-chris

This message is a reply to:
 Message 10 by NosyNed, posted 11-09-2003 2:36 PM NosyNed has not replied

Trump won 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1268 days)
Posts: 1928
Joined: 01-12-2004


Message 13 of 78 (65632)
11-10-2003 6:23 PM
Reply to: Message 11 by Dr Jack
11-10-2003 9:26 AM


Sounds similar to my teacher example.
------------------
-chris

This message is a reply to:
 Message 11 by Dr Jack, posted 11-10-2003 9:26 AM Dr Jack has not replied

Loudmouth
Inactive Member


Message 14 of 78 (65634)
11-10-2003 6:35 PM
Reply to: Message 6 by Rand Al'Thor
11-08-2003 5:30 PM


The exploitation at one of the local shelters is even worse. There is a sermon and a prayer BEFORE food is served. So, to get food, you have to be part of the service. Kind of shifty if you ask me.
And also, athiests also do altruistic things, not because God told them to but because they want to. Athiests join the military and risk their lives overseas, join the Peace Corps, and plenty else. Have you ever heard of an Athiest shelter where they try and talk people out of believing in a god, I sure haven't.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 6 by Rand Al'Thor, posted 11-08-2003 5:30 PM Rand Al'Thor has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 15 by Trump won, posted 11-11-2003 8:55 AM Loudmouth has not replied

Trump won 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1268 days)
Posts: 1928
Joined: 01-12-2004


Message 15 of 78 (65785)
11-11-2003 8:55 AM
Reply to: Message 14 by Loudmouth
11-10-2003 6:35 PM


Well the church I am going to right now has a food giveaway called "vine and branches" and I am almost 100% they don't do any of that. Plus if a homeless person was offended by that he/she could just walk away and then come back when the giveaways take place. They don't force people to listen to or join in their prayer.
------------------
-chris

This message is a reply to:
 Message 14 by Loudmouth, posted 11-10-2003 6:35 PM Loudmouth has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 17 by Brian, posted 11-11-2003 9:15 AM Trump won has replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024